Page 2 of 2
#26
Posted: 20/02/2007 02:32
by van Basten
Ne bih imao ništa protiv doniranja sperme al u slučaju totalne anonimnosti... znači da ja ne znam kome je otišla moja sperma niti da budući roditelji znaju od koga su je dobili... a ako se nekad desi da se u gradu sudarim sa djetetom koje neodoljivo liči na mene... jbg...
za ovu varijantu spomenutu u otvaranju teme nisam ni pod razno... ipak se tu previše stvari zna da bi se tek tako idućih decenija zaboravilo na njih
#27
Posted: 20/02/2007 02:46
by Shoba
eh , kad bi ja imao vremena za to.......
....kad?
#28
Posted: 20/02/2007 02:55
by forUMASH
....bilo je par slucajeva u kojima je oplodnja izvrsena spermom donatora drugacije rase.....naravno, zbog administrativne greske......
#29
Posted: 20/02/2007 02:58
by danas
#30
Posted: 20/02/2007 03:02
by forUMASH
#31
Posted: 20/02/2007 03:20
by Shoshana
StLouis wrote:pa mene i jest strah tih posljedica...
Lijepo ti kazem da ne bi bio prvi koji bi zavrsio placajuci alimentaciju...
Evo, ovo nadjoh na brzinu
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04206/351160.stm a potpuno sam sigurna da sam citala o bar dva-tri slicna slucaja gdje je donor poznat porodici...
Evo ti jos jedan, cak i sa pismenim sporazumom
According to the Associated Press in a release dated November 15, 2001, a Florida appeals court voided a 14-year-old agreement between a mother and her former boyfriend, ordering him to pay child support even though the woman agreed never to seek financial assistance. The 4th District Court of Appeal ruled that the agreement between the mother and father was not valid, even though the father's attorney claimed his client was simply a "sperm donor." In 1987 the mother signed an agreement promising never to divulge the identity of the father. The agreement further stated that only the mother would be named on the birth certificate and she would never seek any financial support. The child was born in 1989. The mother filed a paternity suit against the father in 1999. The 4th District Court of Appeal ruled that the agreement between the mother and father was not valid. The father's attorney argued that he was simply a sperm donor and Florida law states that sperm donors waive parental rights. However, the court ruled that the law only applies to 'assisted reproductive technology' which was not the case in this matter.
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:d0b ... =clnk&cd=9
#32
Posted: 27/03/2007 07:45
by LeKo
"doniram spermu, ugradnja besplatna " - oglas
#33
Posted: 02/04/2007 03:16
by Eshek
Da li je prikladno upitati koju bi ti tehniku doniranja primjenjivao?
