#26
Posted: 15/07/2006 16:08
Kao da je vazno sta je istina.....vazno je zalijepiti etiketi, zapisati itd.Kako mozes optuziti nekoga da laze kada ni sam neznas sta je istina?
Kao da je vazno sta je istina.....vazno je zalijepiti etiketi, zapisati itd.Kako mozes optuziti nekoga da laze kada ni sam neznas sta je istina?
Hvala na iskrenosti.sen wrote:D sen,duso,jel me to ignorises?![]()
Ima li vrucine na Piramidi Sunca?
aha, ignorisem te.
Ima ba, a što pitaš?horns&drums wrote:Hoce li mi ba neko reci vise, ima li tih piramida ili nema?
Vala bas, koliko ima glupih likova .... Umjesto da frtalj energije koju ulazu u "potvrdjivanje" Semirove nebulozne teorije, uloze u izgradnju zemlje i smjenu korumpirane vlasti, u svakom pogledu bi im zivot bio laksi... vako svaku noc kontaju 'ocel' imat' za kirije.burekodsira wrote:koliko ima glupih likova koji zive na nasem podneblju to je bruka... umjesto da pola enegrije koju ulazete u osporavanje svega i svacega o piramidama ulozite u afirmaciju tj pokusate rasvijetliti nejasnoce bilo bi vam lakse zivjeti... vako svaku noc strahujete od srcanog.
Link možda i nije bio, ne znam, ali je priča par puta spominjana, pa da i ja ponovim:Gost123 wrote:sorry ako je bio link:
http://www.net.hr/znanost/page/2006/06/28/0446006.html
Ko je u stvari dr.Zahi Hawass
http://www.zahihawass.com/egypt_news.htm
"Do I need to be more famous? I mean there is no archaeologist who really did what I did in my life. And there is no archaeologist who is known in the streets of Europe and America like me," declared Zahi Hawass, Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), at a press conference organized by the Foreign Press Association.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/piram ... ide_00.htm
http://www.robertschoch.net/Great%20Sph ... oversy.htm
Dok piramida ne osvane iznad visokog da je celi svet vidiHelem wrote:Dok se ne dokaze suprotno,Semir je u pravu.
.....
Eee drug moj, treba prvo dokazati da nema piramidestranacc wrote:Dok piramida ne osvane iznad visokog da je celi svet vidiHelem wrote:Dok se ne dokaze suprotno,Semir je u pravu.
.....
svi su u pravu osim semira ...
i ne izvrcite logiku pobogu
The dominant question for many people currently is: Are the Bosnian Pyramids natural, artificial, or somewhere in between? At this point it is premature for me to attempt an answer to this question, but I certainly have a preliminary working hypothesis. My impression, based on the limited data I have seen, is that the Bosnian Pyramids may have started out as natural hills that were subsequently used and modified. If this is the case, there are certainly similar examples elsewhere in the world. The Great Pyramid of Egypt, the exemplar of all pyramids, is built over an original natural mound structure. But, I must stress that this is simply a working hypothesis concerning the alleged Bosnian Pyramids. One has to be very careful when trying to figure out if a large pyramid-like structure is natural, artificial (man-made), or somewhere in between (for instance a natural feature that was purposefully used and/or modified by humans, a concept sometimes referred to as terraforming [Earth-shaping], although this term originally referred to hypothetically modifying another planet, such as Mars, to become Earth-like and potentially inhabitable by Earthlings).
I cannot judge the Bosnian Pyramids without adequate data. I really need to be able to gather data in such areas as the following: The local stratigraphy (here I am speaking both geologically and archaeologically), the larger cultural and geologic/geomorphologic context of the supposed pyramids, associated ancient occupation sites and possible artifacts, the much heralded tunnels, mining and quarrying activities, tool marks, and so on and so forth. To try to judge based on a few photographs, a handful of satellite images, and miscellaneous statements that are often contradictory (and which have in some cases been subject to mistranslation and misunderstanding), is not my approach. I learned long ago that photographs can be misleading (photographs of features that “clearly look artificial” can be of natural features, and vice versa), and few “authorities” are unbiased.