Forum Klix.ba

Bobi wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:17

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:14 ja cu ga vazektomirizirat

pa mozda mu uchinis uslugu .najbolje caaap

Bobi wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:20

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:13 da, ali ako piski prije seksa, rizik je umanjen

Ok, ključaj temu...niko nije kriv ali su oboje odgovorni .

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:09

This study was designed to establish whether motile spermatozoa are released with pre-ejaculatory fluid and whether this fluid therefore poses a risk for unintended pregnancy. Forty samples of pre-ejaculatory fluid were examined from 27 volunteer men. Samples were obtained by masturbation and by touching the end of the penis with a Petri dish prior to ejaculation. Eleven of the 27 subjects (41%) produced pre-ejaculatory samples that contained spermatozoa and in 10 of these cases (37%), a reasonable proportion of the sperm was motile. The volunteers produced on up to five separate occasions and sperms were found in either all or none of their pre-ejaculatory samples. Hence, condoms should continue to be used from the first moment of genital contact, although it may be that some men, less likely to leak spermatozoa in their pre-ejaculatory fluid, are able to practice coitus interruptus more successfully than others.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564677/

neobican zakljucak, ako se istovremeno trvdi da muskarac ne moze uopce kotnorlirati pre-ejakulatorni dio ( ovo me podjesca na naucno zakljcivanje kao kod corone)

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:13

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:12

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:00

zato se preporucuje uriniranje prije seksa , da se ocisti uretra od sperme

Jos jednom, presjemena tecnost sadrzi spermatozoide, dokazano

da, ali ako piski prije seksa, rizik je umanjen

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:44

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:09

This study was designed to establish whether motile spermatozoa are released with pre-ejaculatory fluid and whether this fluid therefore poses a risk for unintended pregnancy. Forty samples of pre-ejaculatory fluid were examined from 27 volunteer men. Samples were obtained by masturbation and by touching the end of the penis with a Petri dish prior to ejaculation. Eleven of the 27 subjects (41%) produced pre-ejaculatory samples that contained spermatozoa and in 10 of these cases (37%), a reasonable proportion of the sperm was motile. The volunteers produced on up to five separate occasions and sperms were found in either all or none of their pre-ejaculatory samples. Hence, condoms should continue to be used from the first moment of genital contact, although it may be that some men, less likely to leak spermatozoa in their pre-ejaculatory fluid, are able to practice coitus interruptus more successfully than others.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564677/

neobican zakljucak, ako se istovremeno trvdi da muskarac ne moze uopce kotnorlirati pre-ejakulatorni dio ( ovo me podjesca na naucno zakljcivanje kao kod corone)

Zakljucak je obicno cijela recenica, a ne samo dio recenice, pogotovo ako pocinje sa "iako"

Samo kazem

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:50

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:13

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:12

Jos jednom, presjemena tecnost sadrzi spermatozoide, dokazano

da, ali ako piski prije seksa, rizik je umanjen

Ne, rizik je umanjen ako taj koji bi trebao piskit prije seksa spada u onaj procenat muskaraca koji nemaju ili nemaju dovoljno vitalnih spermatozoida u presjemenoj tecnosti da bi moglo doci do nezeljene trudnoce

I onda nije ni bitno je li piskio ili nije piskio
Pod uvjetom, naravno, da je "pravi faker"

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:51 nema, veze, zakljucak je smijesan muskarac jednostavno ne moze kontorlirati precum

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:54 istrazivanja nisu podvukla da je urnirianje iskljucvo za tu doticnu grupu

mislim da uriniranje moze utjecati, jer ociti uretru

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:55

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 11:51 nema, veze, zakljucak je smijesan muskarac jednostavno ne moze kontorlirati precum

Ma smijesno je svasta nesto, vjeruj mi na rijec

Helem nejse

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:01 pa jste smijesno ako tako zakljuce osobe koje su u istrazivackom sektoru

ne mogu ni muzkrac ni zena kkotnorlirati vlazenje spolnih organa

samo pogledaj kanal kretanja pre-cum , kao i kretanja spreme iz testisa , pa ces zakljuciti razlog ciscenja uretre uriniranjem prije seksa

koliko puta se ovako prakticira i ne desi se , a onda, jedn dan , pafffff, omaklo se , to mene intrigira

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:21

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:01 pa jste smijesno ako tako zakljuce osobe koje su u istrazivackom sektoru

ne mogu ni muzkrac ni zena kkotnorlirati vlazenje spolnih organa

samo pogledaj kanal kretanja pre-cum , kao i kretanja spreme iz testisa , pa ces zakljuciti razlog ciscenja uretre uriniranjem prije seksa

koliko puta se ovako prakticira i ne desi se , a onda, jedn dan , pafffff, omaklo se , to mene intrigira

Dobro

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:21

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:01 pa jste smijesno ako tako zakljuce osobe koje su u istrazivackom sektoru

ne mogu ni muzkrac ni zena kkotnorlirati vlazenje spolnih organa

samo pogledaj kanal kretanja pre-cum , kao i kretanja spreme iz testisa , pa ces zakljuciti razlog ciscenja uretre uriniranjem prije seksa

koliko puta se ovako prakticira i ne desi se , a onda, jedn dan , pafffff, omaklo se , to mene intrigira

Dobro

Bobi wrote: ↑16/05/2020 13:40 Ok, ko piški prije ? Neko prije neko za vrijeme .

Boemica wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:10

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:21

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:01 pa jste smijesno ako tako zakljuce osobe koje su u istrazivackom sektoru

ne mogu ni muzkrac ni zena kkotnorlirati vlazenje spolnih organa

samo pogledaj kanal kretanja pre-cum , kao i kretanja spreme iz testisa , pa ces zakljuciti razlog ciscenja uretre uriniranjem prije seksa

koliko puta se ovako prakticira i ne desi se , a onda, jedn dan , pafffff, omaklo se , to mene intrigira

Dobro

Učiš, učiš

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:29

Boemica wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:10

John Cleese wrote: ↑16/05/2020 12:21

Dobro

Učiš, učiš

Boemice, dzaba sve znamo, ali je najsladje bez zastite

Boemica wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:32

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:29

Boemica wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:10

Učiš, učiš

Boemice, dzaba sve znamo, ali je najsladje bez zastite

Ne znam ti ja to, ja sam nevina

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:37

Boemica wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:32

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 14:29

Boemice, dzaba sve znamo, ali je najsladje bez zastite

Ne znam ti ja to, ja sam nevina

na pravoj si temi,upravo pravis bajebi korake

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 10:08

Norm wrote: ↑13/05/2020 14:57 neka djece...

al' tate najcesce pobjegnu

TMovac wrote: ↑16/05/2020 15:36

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 10:08

Norm wrote: ↑13/05/2020 14:57 neka djece...

al' tate najcesce pobjegnu

ja svoje dijete nikad ne bi napustio. Doduse ne bi ni radio takve radnje sa nekim, sa kime ne vidim barem potencijal za nesto vise. Rijesio bi se ti budale, al nece budala tebe.

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 15:53

TMovac wrote: ↑16/05/2020 15:36

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 10:08

al' tate najcesce pobjegnu

ja svoje dijete nikad ne bi napustio. Doduse ne bi ni radio takve radnje sa nekim, sa kime ne vidim barem potencijal za nesto vise. Rijesio bi se ti budale, al nece budala tebe.

potencijal za sto, za potomstvo ?

TMovac wrote: ↑16/05/2020 16:52

Connaisseur Karlin wrote: ↑16/05/2020 15:53

TMovac wrote: ↑16/05/2020 15:36

ja svoje dijete nikad ne bi napustio. Doduse ne bi ni radio takve radnje sa nekim, sa kime ne vidim barem potencijal za nesto vise. Rijesio bi se ti budale, al nece budala tebe.

potencijal za sto, za potomstvo ?

Potencijal za partnericu. Meni ne treba ni kuharica, ni kucna pomocnica. Sposoban sam sam brinuti se o sebi. Zelim partnericu koja je spremna uloziti u nasu vezu, brak, jednako kao i ja. Ne zelim biti taj koji ce ulagati i davati svoj maksimum, a da druga strana ulaze minimalno ili nikako. Zelim vezu / brak sa onom koja ulazi u vezu i brak jer to zeli, a ne samo da bi ispunila neke drustvene norme ili straha od samoce.

So, wait, is there sperm in precum?
Nope, sperm doesn’t live in pre-ejaculate itself. But that doesn’t mean that there may not be some sperm released with precum. Let us explain: Sperm is found in semen, which is estimated to contain 200 to 300 million sperm per ejaculation. Clearly, semen is your biggest issue when it comes to avoiding pregnancy. With that said, precum isn’t completely risk-free.

If all the seminal stars align, precum can theoretically carry live sperm out of the urethra and into your body. If your partner ejaculated sometime leading up to sex with you (and especially if they haven’t urinated since), any live sperm in there can get swept up in precum. (Some experts believe it’s even possible for live sperm to stick around in the urethra post-pee.)

“Typically, it’s not enough for pregnancy,” Dr. Herati says. “The likelihood of pregnancy [from pre-ejaculate] is very low, but it’s never zero.”

In general, precum doesn’t seem to transport top-notch sperm (no offense to the little wrigglers that wind up in this fluid). In that Human Fertility study, only 37 percent of the sperm-containing precum samples had a fair amount of motile sperm, as in, ones that could make the journey toward an egg. (Remember, pre-ejaculate doesn’t naturally contain semen on its own, so this means the precum samples containing sperm picked it up from the urethra on the way out of the body.)