chupacabra wrote:Kako se samo lako poteze rijec "terorizam".
"Terorizam je smišljena upotreba nezakonitog nasilja ili prijetnje nezakonitim nasiljem radi usađivanja straha, s namjerom prisiljavanja ili zastrašivanja vlasti ili društva kako bi se postigli ciljevi koji su općenito politički, vjerski ili ideološki."
Posto se jos nikako ne zna ko je pocinilac i koje su mu namjere, kako se ovo moze odmah karakterisati kao terorizam. Sta ako se uspostavi da ovaj ljudski sljam koji je ovo napravio nema politicke, vjerske ili ideoloske ciljeve, nego jednostavno voli da ubija, a za taj cilj je umjesto automatske puske koristio kuci napravljenu bombu.
Brejvik, na primjer, nije okarakterisan kao terorista, a ubijao je (i to masovno) iz ideoloskih razloga. Termin terorizam se sad uglavnom koristi kada se zeli implicirati da je pocinitelj musliman koji vodi dzihad protiv US. Ne bih da posezem za teorije zavjere, ali nadam se da nece izaci na vijestima neka veza ovog cina sa Iranom. Onda cemo svi znati o cemu se radi.
Kako god, nadam se da ce ovog bolesnika ili bolesnike uhvatiti i da ce dobiti ono sto je zasluzio.
Jos jedan paranoicni post koji ce ovaj dogadjaj iskoristiti da iskaze paranoidni kompleks etiketiranja teroriste.
Breivik je sudjen i osudjen za djelo terorizma:
On 25 July 2011, Breivik was charged with violating paragraph 147a of the Norwegian criminal code,[9][10] "destabilising or destroying basic functions of society" and "creating serious fear in the population",[11]
both acts of terrorism under Norwegian law.
Sa stranice FBI:
Definitions
There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).
The FBI further describes terrorism as either domestic or international, depending on the origin, base, and objectives of the terrorist organization. For the purpose of this report, the FBI will use the following definitions:
■Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or Puerto Rico without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof in furtherance of political or social objectives.
■International terrorism involves violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or any state. These acts appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping. International terrorist acts occur outside the United States or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to coerce or intimidate, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.
The FBI Divides Terrorist-Related Activities into Two Categories:
■A terrorist incident is a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, in violation of the criminal laws of the United States, or of any state, to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
■A terrorism prevention is a documented instance in which a violent act by a known or suspected terrorist group or individual with the means and a proven propensity for violence is successfully interdicted through investigative activity.
Dakle, osim ako je u pitanju neki kretino a la onaj sto je nedavno pobio 30oro djece gotovo svaki ostali napad ovakve naravi se okarakterise kao terorizam sto se tice nekog kvazi-pravnog aspekta.
Valjda Obama ima dovoljno informacija da bi ga okarakterisao kao takvog, znajuci da njegova karatkerizacija ovog dogadjaja kao takvog nema nikakvog pravnog znacaja za sam tok istrage.
Njegova karakterizacija ovoga kao djelo terorizma moze samo biti shvacena pogresno od ljudi koji paranoicno pokusavaju povezati svaki dogadjaj sa napadom na muslimane.
Da li treba ponoviti jos koji put -
za sada u javnosti ne postoje nikakve zvanicne izjave u vezi pocinioca ovog zlocina.
