AkHolic wrote:HM 2011 wrote:
Ustavni sud stavio ad acta zakon o JMB - donosi se entitetski propis o JMB u namjeri određivanja JMB - krši se rješenje suda - krivično djelo, sankcija od strane Ustavnog suda nema, tužilaštvo nije maklo ni milimetra - aktivnosti SIPE - nema -
Ustavni sud podsjeća na to da je svojom Odlukom broj
U 3/11 od 27. maja 2011. godine odredio način i rok za
izvršenje odluke. Prema članu VI/5. Ustava Bosne i
Hercegovine, odluke Ustavnog suda su konačne i obavezujuće.
Također, prema članu 74. stav 1. Pravila Ustavnog suda,
konačne i obavezujuće odluke Ustavnog suda dužno je
poštovati svako fizičko i pravno lice, a prema stavu 2. istog
člana, svi organi vlasti su dužni u okviru svojih nadležnosti
utvrđenih Ustavom i zakonom provoditi odluke Ustavnog suda.
I u usporednom pravu ustavni sudovi nemaju mehanizme za implementiranje svojih odluka.Obveze parlamenata ili vlade kad je riječ o odlukama te vrste sudova su više moralne no pravne prirode.Bitna stvar koju nestručnjaci previđaju je i da takva obveza limitirana na uklanjenje propisa ili dijela propisa koji je oglašen neustavnim ili nezakonitim. nikako i obveza parlamenta ili vlade da usvoje nov propis kojim uređuje ista pitanja kao i onaj koji je oglašen neustavnim-nezakonitim jer bi se tako sudska ili ustavno-sudska vlast postavila iznad zakonodavne ili izvršne.
O kaznenoj odgovornosti zastupnika moglo bi se govoriti samo ako nasilno ili na neki drugi protivpravan način sprječavaju provođenje odluka ustavnog suda.
Sve goli stručnjaci -
Šta je sud:
Sud je trajno organizovano tijelo sa nezvaisnim sudačkim ovlastima definiranim zakonom, koje se sastaje na vrijeme i u mjestu propisano zakonom, u svrhu "javne sudske provedbe pravde". (Federalna praksa, jursidikcija i procedura 1931.)
1. Sudska vlast je nezavisna - Check
2. Sudska vlast donosi Odluku - Check
3. Odluka se ne implementira - Check
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Izvod iz Pravila Ustavnog suda
9. Izvršenje odluka
Član 74.
1. Odluke Ustavnog suda konačne su i obavezne i dužno ih je poštovati svako
fizičko i pravno lice.
2.
Svi organi vlasti dužni su, u okviru svojih nadležnosti utvrđenih ustavom i zakonom, provoditi odluke Ustavnog suda.
3. Svako ko ima pravni interes može tražiti da se izvrši odluka Ustavnog suda.
4. Ustavni sud u svojoj odluci može odrediti način i rok izvršavanja odluke Ustavnog suda.
5. U roku iz stava 4. ovog člana organ koji je obavezan da izvrši odluku Ustavnog
suda dužan je dostaviti obavještenje o preduzetim mjerama s ciljem izvršenja odluke
Ustavnog suda, kako je to naznačeno u odluci.
6. U slučaju nepostupanja, odnosno kašnjenja u izvršavanju ili obavještavanju
Ustavnog suda o preduzetim mjerama, Ustavni sud donosi rješenje kojim se utvrđuje da
odluka Ustavnog suda nije izvršena, odnosno može odrediti način izvršenja odluke. Ovo
rješenje dostavlja se nadležnom tužiocu, odnosno drugom organu nadležnom za izvršenje
kojeg odredi Ustavni sud.
Član 75.
Izvršenje konačnih, odnosno pravosnažnih pojedinačnih akata, donesenih na osnovu
odredbi koje su prestale važiti u smislu člana 63. ovih pravila, ne može se ni odrediti ni
provesti, a ako je izvršenje započeto obustavit će se.
Član 76.
1. Ako se utvrdi da se izmjenom pojedinačnog akta ne mogu otkloniti posljedice
nastale primjenom odredbi za koje je utvrđeno da su nesaglasne, Ustavni sud može, na
zahtjev zainteresiranog lica, odrediti da se te posljedice otklone povratom u pređašnje
stanje, naknadom štete ili na drugi način.
2. U odluci kojom usvaja apelaciju Ustavni sud, izuzetno, na zahtjev apelanta, može
odrediti naknadu za nematerijalnu štetu.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Izvod iz Ustava BiH
Jurisdiction. The Constitutional Court shall uphold this Constitution.
The Constitutional Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to decide any dispute that arises under this Constitution between the Entities or between Bosnia and Herzegovina and an Entity or Entities, or between institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including but not limited to:
Whether an Entity's decision to establish a special parallel relationship with a neighboring state is consistent with this Constitution, including provisions concerning the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Whether any provision of an Entity's constitution or law is consistent with this Constitution.
Disputes may be referred only by a member of the Presidency, by the Chair of the Council of Ministers, by the Chair or a Deputy Chair of either chamber of the Parliamentary Assembly, by one-fourth of the members of either chamber of the Parliamentary Assembly, or by one-fourth of either chamber of a legislature of an Entity.
The Constitutional Court shall also have appellate jurisdiction over issues under this Constitution arising out of a judgment of any other court in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Constitutional Court shall have jurisdiction over issues referred by any court in Bosnia and Herzegovina concerning whether a law, on whose validity its decision depends, is compatible with this Constitution, with the European Convention for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Protocols, or with the laws of Bosnia and Herzegovina; or concerning the existence of or the scope of a general rule of public international law pertinent to the court's decision.
Decisions. Decisions of the Constitutional Court shall be final and binding.
-----------------------------------------------------
Primjer iz prakse, minimalan....
Manama: In a landmark judgement, Kuwait’s highest court on Sunday ruled to dissolve the parliament elected in December.
However, in the ruling expected to have wide-reaching implications over the political landscape in the northern Arabian Gulf state, the Constitutional Court upheld the decree amending the 2006 electoral law that slashed the number of candidates a voter could elect to parliament from four to one.
The opposition had pushed for an annulment of the Emiri decree issued in October ahead of the December 1 parliamentary elections.
For the opposition, there was no need for the decree and the Emir should have waited until a parliament was elected and its members voted on the proposed amendment.
Article continues below
For the opposition, mainly tribesmen and Islamists who carried the majority of the seats in the February 2012 elections, the four-ballot possibility meant greater chances for them to reach the parliament through alliances and agreements. The “one voter, one vote” principle would be much more favourable to the government and its supporters.
During the bitter standoff between the government and the opposition in the run-up to the elections, the government held firm and did not waiver, stressing that it was confident about its decision to amend the electoral law.
Related Links
Kuwait opposition divided by court ruling
Timeline: Kuwait parliament
Kuwait court scraps poll, approves electoral law
Boycott calls in November failed to mobilise the population against the elections and the turnout was exceptionally high, leaving the opposition to lick its wounds and to deal with the fissures that started to appear at the seams of the alliance between liberals and Islamists.
The post-election threats to enlist the support of international organisations against the decree and the new parliament backfired and the opposition had to recoil and think of more patriotic options, including taking the case to the country’s top court.
On Sunday, the court maintained the decree, making the “one voter, one vote” a reality that the current generation of Kuwaiti men and women have to accept.
Constitutional experts and lawyers rushed to scrutinise the ruling and see if they can interpret it to their advantage.
The cabinet held an emergency meeting to look into the details and the measures that could be taken.
“We are proud with the commitment of the court to justice and we hail the honesty of our judges,” the cabinet said. “The constitution remains the ultimate judge on all legal interpretations and differences. The cabinet has tasked the competent parties to look into the ruling and follow up on the measures to be taken to implement it,” the cabinet said a few hours after the court pronounced its much-anticipated verdict.
The National Action Bloc said that it respected the ruling by the Constitutional Court in upholding the “one voter, one vote” decree.
“We remain committed to the constitution and to the law in the state of institutions that has given the Constitutional Court the right to decide in cases of divergences. We urge everybody to respect the constitution and the justice system. We totally reject taking to the streets and undermine public security,” the bloc said in a statement.
Outgoing parliament Speaker Ali Al Rashed said that he looked forward to the national elections. “May God be with us,” he said. “The most important thing is the stability of Kuwait. We will be all gone at a certain stage, but Kuwait shall remain.”
For the man who was Speaker between December and June, the advisors are to blame for the situation. “They are the ones who have pushed the decision makers into this situation,” he said.
Former MP Salman Al Dabboos said that all the political formations had to accept the court’s ruling. However, he singled out the decision to dissolve the parliament.
“This is a historic moment in the political life of Kuwait and everybody should accept it. I hope that the ruling will contribute to marking the start of new democratic practices in Kuwait and the end of the tension that hit the country for some time. It is fine to have divergent views as long as there is the constitution to act as the arbitrator.”
Kuwaiti media said that the Emir Shaikh Sabah Al Ahmad would address the nation on Sunday evening over the ruling.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Potencijal:
1. Nametanje izjašnjavanja o provođenju presude,
2. Raspuštanje parlamenta i trajna zabrana kandidovanja za kandidate koji su glasali protiv provođenja presude,
3. Vandredni izbori....
----------------------------------------------------------------
KZ BIH
Neizvršenje odluke Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine, Suda Bosne i Hercegovine, Doma za ljudska prava ili
Evropskog suda za ljudska prava
Član 239.
Službena osoba u institucijama Bosne i Hercegovine, institucijama entiteta ili institucijama Brčko Distrikta Bosne i
Hercegovine, koja odbije da izvrši konačnu i izvršnu odluku Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine, Suda Bosne i
Hercegovine, Doma za ljudska prava ili Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, ili sprječava da se takva odluka izvrši, ili na
drugi način onemogućava njeno izvršenje,
kaznit će se kaznom zatvora od šest mjeseci do pet godina.
Imunitet:
^lan 2.
Predmet i primjena Zakona
Ovim zakonom utvr|uju se osobe koje imaju pravo pozvati se na svoj imunitet u odbrani u krivi~nom i parni~nom postupku i propisuju se posebna pravila krivi~nog i parni~nog postupka po kojem su tu`ila{tva, sudovi, kao i drugi u~esnici u krivi~nom i parni~nom postupku du`ni postupati u skladu s ovim zakonom. Nijedna odredba ovog zakona ne}e na bilo koji na~in biti u suprotnosti s postupcima ili nadle`no{}u Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine kako to predvi|a ~lan VI. Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sve su to stručnjaci - a vidim divan presedan se pravi - kao onomad kad je samo pitanje promjene naziva općina, tj. brisanje prefiksa Bosanski iz naziva općina proglašeno postupkom u skladu sa ustavom....
Ali dobro je da stručnjaci postoje - jer da ih nema - ne bi nam niko imao reći šta se može i koliko je ko stručan....
Ustavni sud stavio ad acta zakon o JMB - donosi se entitetski propis o JMB u namjeri određivanja JMB - krši se rješenje suda - krivično djelo, sankcija od strane Ustavnog suda nema, tužilaštvo nije maklo ni milimetra - aktivnosti SIPE - nema -
Nema u uporednom pravu ovakvih parlamentaraca - nije se desio slučaj da parlament ne izvršava presudu - pa se nema ko pozvati na uporedno pravo..... Pored toga složenost BiH kao Složene države - i način donošenjea Ustava BiH - kao i samo važenje UStava BiH uopšte - takođe ne postoji u uporednom pravu - pa ono što ne postoji u uporednom pravu stručnjaci ne mogu niti upoređivati...
Sad mi samo otkrij tajnu - koji su te profesori tako fino zadojili znanjem o svemu osim o svojoj domovini ?
eh sad bi bilo pravo vrijeme da neko koji put i boga opsuje - čisto identifikacije radi - i da nam kaže da će nam sutra kapu krojiti......
svoju bazu najjacu ima jel u banjaluci i mostaru i sarajevu,sigurno ne tuzli ,i malo sarajevu 
ostalo jos 4 dana do isteka ultimatuma 30. juna!