Really? Ako je ovo poslastica za feministkinje, bilo kakve, i bilo gdje, ubij me sad.Škobo Habu wrote: ↑03/05/2022 10:54 Evo poslastice za ovdašnje feministkinje:
https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatsk ... a-15192212
Barem sam ja tako shvatao naziv.ja nisam nikad.no_sikiriki wrote: ↑03/05/2022 11:54Ja sam oduvijek shvatala taj naziv u kontekstu žene, domaćice, koja servira taj keks gostima, npr.
Potpuno obrnuto mišljenje imam - Isusa u povijesti itekako ima - on je centralna ličnost u razvoju Zapadne civilizacije. Ako pitaš kakvog naučnika koji je usput i liberalni teolog ili konzervativni kršćanin... on će ti reći da je samo Evandjelje dokaz o njegovom postojanju. No, na stranu to. Za nekog sociologa koji proučava razvoj Zapadne civiliziacije - Isus predstavlja centralno mjesto, figuru, motivaciju... i u tom smislu je historijska ličnost.n+1 wrote: ↑03/05/2022 09:39 Ne postoje dokazi o Isusu kao povijesnoj ličnosti, što znači da ne možemo govoriti o povijesnom Isusu. O njemu možemo govoriti jedino kao religijskoj figuri iz religijskih tekstova.
Samim tim, potpuno je besmisleno reći "možda je bio historijska ličnost". Ne, možda je postojao, to svakako. Ali nije povijesna ličnost, jer ga u povijesti nema. Distinkcija je suptilna, ali važna.
Dobro, hajde da ne banaliziramo. Ako je Evanđelje dokaz o Isusovom postojanju, onda je Teogonija dokaz Zeusovog postojanja, a Vede su dokaz da postoji Višnu. To nije ozbiljna priča.piupiu wrote: ↑03/05/2022 13:10Potpuno obrnuto mišljenje imam - Isusa u povijesti itekako ima - on je centralna ličnost u razvoju Zapadne civilizacije. Ako pitaš kakvog naučnika koji je usput i liberalni teolog ili konzervativni kršćanin... on će ti reći da je samo Evandjelje dokaz o njegovom postojanju. No, na stranu to. Za nekog sociologa koji proučava razvoj Zapadne civiliziacije - Isus predstavlja centralno mjesto, figuru, motivaciju... i u tom smislu je historijska ličnost.n+1 wrote: ↑03/05/2022 09:39 Ne postoje dokazi o Isusu kao povijesnoj ličnosti, što znači da ne možemo govoriti o povijesnom Isusu. O njemu možemo govoriti jedino kao religijskoj figuri iz religijskih tekstova.
Samim tim, potpuno je besmisleno reći "možda je bio historijska ličnost". Ne, možda je postojao, to svakako. Ali nije povijesna ličnost, jer ga u povijesti nema. Distinkcija je suptilna, ali važna.
Ako se držimo rimskih spisa, onda on nije nikakva historijska ličnost. Mislim na razdoblje njegova života. Tek se onako uzgred spominje.
Da.piupiu wrote: ↑03/05/2022 13:10Potpuno obrnuto mišljenje imam - Isusa u povijesti itekako ima - on je centralna ličnost u razvoju Zapadne civilizacije. Ako pitaš kakvog naučnika koji je usput i liberalni teolog ili konzervativni kršćanin... on će ti reći da je samo Evandjelje dokaz o njegovom postojanju. No, na stranu to. Za nekog sociologa koji proučava razvoj Zapadne civiliziacije - Isus predstavlja centralno mjesto, figuru, motivaciju... i u tom smislu je historijska ličnost.n+1 wrote: ↑03/05/2022 09:39 Ne postoje dokazi o Isusu kao povijesnoj ličnosti, što znači da ne možemo govoriti o povijesnom Isusu. O njemu možemo govoriti jedino kao religijskoj figuri iz religijskih tekstova.
Samim tim, potpuno je besmisleno reći "možda je bio historijska ličnost". Ne, možda je postojao, to svakako. Ali nije povijesna ličnost, jer ga u povijesti nema. Distinkcija je suptilna, ali važna.
Ako treba dokaz da je feminizam još uvijek potreban i da borba još uvijek traje onda je to ovo.WASHINGTON, May 2 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court looks set to vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a leaked initial draft majority opinion published by Politico on Monday.
The unprecedented leak from the conservative-majority Supreme Court sent shock waves through the United States, not least because the court prides itself on keeping its internal deliberations secret and leaks are extremely uncommon.
Reuters was not able to confirm the authenticity of the draft. The Supreme Court and the White House declined to comment.
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the draft opinion which is dated Feb. 10, according to Politico, which posted a copy online.
Based on Alito's opinion, the court would find that the Roe v. Wade decision that allowed abortions performed before a fetus would be viable outside the womb - between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy - was wrongly decided because the U.S. Constitution makes no specific mention of abortion rights.
"Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion," Alito said, according to the leaked document.
Take a look at the world's abortion laws
The news broke a little more than six months before the mid-term elections that will determine if Democrats hold their razor-thin majorities in the U.S. Congress for the next two years of President Joe Biden's term in office.
Abortion is one of the most divisive issues in U.S. politics and has been for nearly a half century.
"This decision is a direct assault on the dignity, rights, & lives of women, not to mention decades of settled law," said former U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton. read more
"It will kill and subjugate women even as a vast majority of Americans think abortion should be legal. What an utter disgrace."
Republican Senator Tom Cotton said: "...Roe was egregiously wrong from the beginning & I pray the Court follows the Constitution & allows the states to once again protect unborn life."
Protestors react outside the U.S. Supreme Court to the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision later this year, in Washington, U.S., May 2, 2022. REUTERS/Moira Warburton
After an initial vote among the justices following an oral argument, one is assigned the majority opinion and writes a draft. It is then circulated among the justices.
At times, in between the initial vote and the ruling being released, the vote alignment can change. A ruling is only final when it is published by the court.
In a post on Twitter, Neal Katyal, a lawyer who regularly argues before the court, said if the report was accurate it would be "the first major leak from the Supreme Court ever."
The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, heard oral arguments in December on Mississippi's bid to revive its ban on abortion starting at 15 weeks of pregnancy, a law blocked by lower courts. read more
It appeared based on December's oral argument that a majority was inclined to uphold Mississippi's abortion ban and that there could be five votes to overturn Roe.
The Roe v. Wade decision recognized that the right to personal privacy under the U.S. Constitution protects a woman's ability to terminate her pregnancy.
Christian conservatives and many Republican officeholders have long sought to overturn it.
The Supreme Court in a 1992 ruling called Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey reaffirmed abortion rights and prohibited laws imposing an "undue burden" on abortion access.
Mississippi asked the justices to overturn both rulings and Alito's draft opinion largely adopts the Republican state's arguments.
If Roe is overturned, abortion is likely to remain legal in liberal states. More than a dozen states currently have laws protecting abortion rights. Numerous Republican-led states have passed various abortion restrictions in defiance of the Roe precedent in recent years.
Republicans could try to enact a nationwide abortion ban, while Democrats could also seek to protect abortion rights at the national level.
Democrats said the draft opinion undermines the importance of this year's elections, in which they are seeking to maintain control of the House and Senate.
"We need to turn out the vote like we've never turned out the vote before," Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin told MSNBC. "The people need to stand up and defend democratic institutions and the rights of the people because the Supreme Court is certainly not doing anything for us."
Republican Senator Josh Hawley said, without evidence, that the leak was likely from a liberal inside the court.
"The justices mustn’t give in to this attempt to corrupt the process. Stay strong," he said in a Twitter post.
Prvo da se riješi pitanje nejednakih plata, zastupljenosti u političkim funkcijama i visoko plaćenim pozicijama u korporacijama, pa će onda oko tih banalnosti.dale cooper wrote: ↑03/05/2022 14:59 Ono čega su se svi pribojavali da će se desiti imenovanjima Trumpa i postavljanja konzervativaca u ustavni sud SAD-a će se vrlo brzo
i vrlo vjerovatno i ostvariti. Roe v. Wade odluka koja je legalizovala abortus će biti oborena.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/leaked ... 022-05-03/
Ako treba dokaz da je feminizam još uvijek potreban i da borba još uvijek traje onda je to ovo.WASHINGTON, May 2 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court looks set to vote to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide, according to a leaked initial draft majority opinion published by Politico on Monday.
The unprecedented leak from the conservative-majority Supreme Court sent shock waves through the United States, not least because the court prides itself on keeping its internal deliberations secret and leaks are extremely uncommon.
Reuters was not able to confirm the authenticity of the draft. The Supreme Court and the White House declined to comment.
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the draft opinion which is dated Feb. 10, according to Politico, which posted a copy online.
Based on Alito's opinion, the court would find that the Roe v. Wade decision that allowed abortions performed before a fetus would be viable outside the womb - between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy - was wrongly decided because the U.S. Constitution makes no specific mention of abortion rights.
"Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion," Alito said, according to the leaked document.
Take a look at the world's abortion laws
The news broke a little more than six months before the mid-term elections that will determine if Democrats hold their razor-thin majorities in the U.S. Congress for the next two years of President Joe Biden's term in office.
Abortion is one of the most divisive issues in U.S. politics and has been for nearly a half century.
"This decision is a direct assault on the dignity, rights, & lives of women, not to mention decades of settled law," said former U.S. Secretary of State Hilary Clinton. read more
"It will kill and subjugate women even as a vast majority of Americans think abortion should be legal. What an utter disgrace."
Republican Senator Tom Cotton said: "...Roe was egregiously wrong from the beginning & I pray the Court follows the Constitution & allows the states to once again protect unborn life."
Protestors react outside the U.S. Supreme Court to the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights decision later this year, in Washington, U.S., May 2, 2022. REUTERS/Moira Warburton
After an initial vote among the justices following an oral argument, one is assigned the majority opinion and writes a draft. It is then circulated among the justices.
At times, in between the initial vote and the ruling being released, the vote alignment can change. A ruling is only final when it is published by the court.
In a post on Twitter, Neal Katyal, a lawyer who regularly argues before the court, said if the report was accurate it would be "the first major leak from the Supreme Court ever."
The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, heard oral arguments in December on Mississippi's bid to revive its ban on abortion starting at 15 weeks of pregnancy, a law blocked by lower courts. read more
It appeared based on December's oral argument that a majority was inclined to uphold Mississippi's abortion ban and that there could be five votes to overturn Roe.
The Roe v. Wade decision recognized that the right to personal privacy under the U.S. Constitution protects a woman's ability to terminate her pregnancy.
Christian conservatives and many Republican officeholders have long sought to overturn it.
The Supreme Court in a 1992 ruling called Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey reaffirmed abortion rights and prohibited laws imposing an "undue burden" on abortion access.
Mississippi asked the justices to overturn both rulings and Alito's draft opinion largely adopts the Republican state's arguments.
If Roe is overturned, abortion is likely to remain legal in liberal states. More than a dozen states currently have laws protecting abortion rights. Numerous Republican-led states have passed various abortion restrictions in defiance of the Roe precedent in recent years.
Republicans could try to enact a nationwide abortion ban, while Democrats could also seek to protect abortion rights at the national level.
Democrats said the draft opinion undermines the importance of this year's elections, in which they are seeking to maintain control of the House and Senate.
"We need to turn out the vote like we've never turned out the vote before," Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin told MSNBC. "The people need to stand up and defend democratic institutions and the rights of the people because the Supreme Court is certainly not doing anything for us."
Republican Senator Josh Hawley said, without evidence, that the leak was likely from a liberal inside the court.
"The justices mustn’t give in to this attempt to corrupt the process. Stay strong," he said in a Twitter post.
Pa nema tu timova. Nego ja vs. ostatak svijeta. Čak sam i muža pitala, i on je na vašem timu.
S obzirom na trenutnu kampanju, ima vas još.no_sikiriki wrote: ↑03/05/2022 15:33Pa nema tu timova. Nego ja vs. ostatak svijeta. Čak sam i muža pitala, i on je na vašem timu.
Ma hoću Domaćin. Nek on zasuče rukave.Sara03 wrote: ↑03/05/2022 15:38S obzirom na trenutnu kampanju, ima vas još.no_sikiriki wrote: ↑03/05/2022 15:33
Pa nema tu timova. Nego ja vs. ostatak svijeta. Čak sam i muža pitala, i on je na vašem timu.
Hoću "domaćica i forumašica", molim lijepo.
Angliciramo jezik polako ali sigurno. Ne samo korištenjem riječi i izraza, nego i fraza. Gore napisano je najbolji primjer. U našem jeziku se nikada nije koristila fraza ultimativni cilj.MarlboroGold wrote: ↑03/05/2022 16:52 Ljudi su sa tom kampanjom keksa postigli da će prodaja biti još veća. To je i bio ultimativni cilj, jer se znalo kakve će biti reakcije kad je u pitanju ovo podneblje.
saint_mirad wrote: ↑03/05/2022 16:51 ako hoće da rebrendiraju keks da ugode novim woke generacijama neka uklone sasvim naziv domaćica, jer žene rođene posle 1993. ne kuvaju i ne rade domaće poslove. jedino što znaju jeste da pune svoje telefone, lažu i budu biseksualne.
