meni samo nejasno zašto se svaki put iznenadimo kad nas izvrate na neki ovakav način, ko da su juče stupili na scenu, mene samo impresioniraju inovativnošću, poljoprivrredna firma uvozi medicinsku opremu, hahahaha, toga se no broj 1 ne bi sjetio u alan fordu
#22928 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:29
by sumirprimus
Onaj osjecaj za filing kad nas covjek pocne ismijavat i obezvredjivat ljude kao gejts koji su direktno uticali na cjelokupno covjecanstvo. Nevjerovatno
Ta ce gejts lizard vid mu glave
#22929 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:31
by sumirprimus
Sve zavjere provalili. Nema fule. Materijal za nobela samo da neko predlozi
#22930 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
meni samo nejasno zašto se svaki put iznenadimo kad nas izvrate na neki ovakav način, ko da su juče stupili na scenu, mene samo impresioniraju inovativnošću, poljoprivrredna firma uvozi medicinsku opremu, hahahaha, toga se no broj 1 ne bi sjetio u alan fordu
Mene ne cudi sto oni kradu...krali su i krasce, ali mene vise cudi nase odobravanje ovog kriminala vec 30 godina i do kada vise?
#22931 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:32
by index_box
freelancerBIH wrote: ↑27/04/2020 14:47
O tome da li ce se virus vratit na zimu ili ne - saznat cemo iducih par mjeseci jer zemlje poput Australije vec polako ulaze u svoj zimski period - ako se dole ne vrati - nece ni u Evropi - a zasad su sve naznake da nece nadam se
Neće se vratiti zato što nikad neće ni otići.
Samo će ga preklasificirati u onu skupinu s druga četiri koronavirusa koja konstantno cirkuliraju s virusima gripe.
Nekrofilija se nastavlja.
#22932 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:33
by He1972
sumirprimus wrote: ↑27/04/2020 15:29
Onaj osjecaj za filing kad nas covjek pocne ismijavat i obezvredjivat ljude kao gejts koji su direktno uticali na cjelokupno covjecanstvo. Nevjerovatno
Ta ce gejts lizard vid mu glave
gates je tata, samo su mu windoze poskupe, haha
#22933 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
#22934 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:37
by sumirprimus
Djes indijana dzons za teorije zavjera. Materijal za nobela samo niko da predlozi. Cash flow
Terapija za takozvanu koronu tri liza i dva linka jel tako nekako?
#22935 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:39
by sumirprimus
E carevi ste, posle tri linka i 12 klipova ni gejts vam nije do koljena
Provalilo u najvece tajne covjecanstva.koja drskost
#22936 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:39
by House
gledaj fikreta što mulja . napiši još koju knjigu o srebrenici mame ti se najebem seljačke
#22937 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:41
by cvrčak_na_hedonizmu
sumirprimus wrote: ↑27/04/2020 15:37
Djes indijana dzons za teorije zavjera. Materijal za nobela samo niko da predlozi. Cash flow
Terapija za takozvanu koronu tri liza i dva linka jel tako nekako?
Takozvani Sariel ne zna da cita ? Ne cudi, potrudi se malo pa navrni kasnije i mani se Tusnja, sve im pojede, bune se ljudi
Ps. Ne moras cetiri posta napisati, moze sve u jedan. Skocentrisi se, mozes ti to
Pelcovanje je iz dzeneta izaslo
#22938 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:44
by sumirprimus
Jesi i to pokupio s jutjuba ko i ove teorije zavjera? Il imas i pokoji s interneta link sa izvjestajima renomiranih strucnjaka a koje si pogledo i procitao? S interneta?
Ili puno ocekujem? Mozda previse za jedan smislen odgovor?
#22939 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:46
by daddy-kool
U nedostatku naučnih studija, provjerenih tekstova iz uglednih časopisa, uglavnom se citiraju mudrosti sa twittera, facebooka, youtuba, opskurnih portala koje uređuje jedan čovjek iz kuće ili ovih ruskih i srbijanskih dezinformatora. Jasno je koliko je sati.
#22940 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:51
by cvrčak_na_hedonizmu
Evo mene opet
Malo sam istraživao zašto se neke stvari spominju toliko u teorijama zavjere, nekoliko linkova nije dovoljno za bilo šta, dosadno mi zato sam se malo više zarovio i evo šta sam našao.
Kao što rekoh, moj princip jeste no pic, didnt happen. Pa da nastavimo u tom smijeru.
Ljudi se čude pričama o "čipovanju" ( mada je ispravan izraz Digitalni ID, Imunološki Pasoš ili oboje ), a zapravo to sve je već objavljeno. Peta je priča što to neko objašnjava kao altruizam, napredak tehnologije ili "čipovanje". Stvar je perspektive i gledišta.
To bi zapravo trebabalo da bude diskusija, prednosti i mane navedenog, a ne
he, he, he, cipovace nas, 5G, urota, stavi foliju na glavu odgovori Možda dođe, nevidljiva, tetovaža sa "bar kodom" i aplikacijom koja je čita, sa zelenim, žutim i crvenim odbrenjem. Ako si u crvenom, nećeš nigdje. Nemoguće ba, nismo stoka, realno
Zeleno, Žuto, crveno, social credits - made by China
Pa šta, reći će vrli pitac, kakve to veze ima sa nama, jel to neko misli da nama mogu staviti tetovaže, nerealno ba, nismo kinezi, ipak je Zapad u pitanju
wrote: ↑
Kevin McHugh, an assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice since this summer, and a team at his previous institution, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, report in a cover story in Science Translational Medicine on their development of quantum-dot tags that fluoresce with information after they’re injected as part of a vaccination.
The tags are incorporated in only some of the array of sugar-based microneedles on a patch. When the needles dissolve in about two minutes, they deliver the vaccine and leave the pattern of tags just under the skin, where they become something like a bar-code tattoo.
“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation came to us and said, ‘Hey, we have a real problem — knowing who’s vaccinated,’” said McHugh, who was recruited to join Rice with funding from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. “They said, ‘We go on vaccination campaigns where people get into Hummers, drive to a rural village, set up a tent and start immunizing people, but they don’t always know who’s been immunized before and what vaccines are still needed.”
wrote: ↑
Keeping track of vaccinations remains a major challenge in the developing world, and even in many developed countries, paperwork gets lost, and parents forget whether their child is up to date. Now a group of Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers has developed a novel way to address this problem: embedding the record directly into the skin.
Along with the vaccine, a child would be injected with a bit of dye that is invisible to the naked eye but easily seen with a special cell-phone filter, combined with an app that shines near-infrared light onto the skin. The dye would be expected to last up to five years, according to tests on pig and rat skin and human skin in a dish...................
.....When people were still getting vaccinated for smallpox, which has since been eradicated worldwide, they got a visible scar on their arm from the shot that made it easy to identify who had been vaccinated and who had not, Jaklenec says. “But obviously, we didn’t want to give people a scar,” she says, noting that her team was looking for an identifier that would be invisible to the naked eye. The researchers also wanted to avoid technologies that would raise even more privacy concerns, such as iris scans and databases with names and identifiable data, she says.
The work was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and came about because of a direct request from Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates himself, who has been supporting efforts to wipe out diseases such as polio and measles across the world, Jaklenec says. “If we don’t have good data, it’s really difficult to eradicate disease,” she says.
The researchers hope to add more detailed information to the dots, such as the date of vaccination. Along with them, the team eventually wants to inject sensors that could also potentially be used to track aspects of health such as insulin levels in diabetics, Jaklenec says.
wrote: ↑
US firm combines nanotechnology, blockchain for COVID-19 immunity passports
“Not only does this service facilitate improved health outcomes for patients, but it also underpins back-to-work certifications, sometimes referred to as immunization passports,” said Stephen B. Squires, President & CEO of QMC.
With the health data backed by blockchain, governments and health agencies can formulate new plans and safety measures to contain the spread of COVID-19 and other diseases. Additionally, individual users can assess their immunization passport using a mobile application. The app features color-coded indicators — green, yellow, and red. If the app shows the green indicator, the individual has clearance to interact in social and work environments. This indicator can be shared and authenticated by others using a QR code.
“The world must have a system that eliminates the fears and anxiety of not knowing who is able to return to work,” said Les Paull, CEO of QMVT, the unit responsible for sales and marketing of QMC’s innovations.
The solution is hosted on the Microsoft Azure cloud and can integrate with existing EMR systems. It is based on the Hyperledger Sawtooth enterprise blockchain and for smart contracts, it’s using the Digital Asset Modeling Language (DAML).
Yesterday, Ledger Insights reported on the COVID Credentials initiative (CCI), which uses digital identity to develop “immunity passports”. Members of the initiative include Evernym, ID2020, uPort, Dutch research organization TNO, Microsoft, ConsenSys Health and consultants Luxoft and many others.
Dobro, možda razvijaju nevidljivu bar kod tetovažu, aplikacije i ostalo, hajde ko da je bitno, ali šta je sa ostalim, to mora da su gluposti, ljudi izmišljaju, pišu na pamet
wrote: ↑
Bringing privacy-protecting, portable and user-centric digital identity to life.
ID2020 supports digital identity programs that both directly improve lives and generate needed evidence for how we maximize the potential of digital ID for everyone.
ps. moraću da nastavim u narednom postu, ne dopušta mi više linkova,
#22941 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:51
by cvrčak_na_hedonizmu
Opet ja
Živahna ID2020 ( sa veoma zanimljivim imenom )
wrote: ↑
The ID2020 Alliance has launched a new digital identity program at its annual summit in New York, in collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh, vaccine alliance Gavi, and new partners in government, academia, and humanitarian relief.
The program to leverage immunization as an opportunity to establish digital identity was unveiled by ID2020 in partnership with the Bangladesh Government’s Access to Information (a2i) Program, the Directorate General of Health Services, and Gavi, according to the announcement.
Digital identity is a computerized record of who a person is, stored in a registry. It is used, in this case, to keep track of who has received vaccination.
“We are implementing a forward-looking approach to digital identity that gives individuals control over their own personal information, while still building off existing systems and programs,” says Anir Chowdhury, policy advisor at a2i. “The Government of Bangladesh recognizes that the design of digital identity systems carries far-reaching implications for individuals’ access to services and livelihoods, and we are eager to pioneer this approach.”
wrote: ↑
ID2020 will be collaborating with the City of Austin, along with the Austin Blockchain Collective, Dell Medical School, and the National Innovation Service, on developing MyPass — a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform for people experiencing homelessness. The MyPass project is funded by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
“Cities lie at the frontline of providing crucial social services to vulnerable populations,” said ID2020’s Executive Director, Dakota Gruener. “This is an impactful space where digital identity can help address major urban challenges, and improve the daily lives of residents. We are so excited to be working with the City’s Office of Innovation on developing their digital identity solution for people experiencing homelessness.”
Kada na sve navedeno dodamo još vezu Gatesa sa Imperial Koledž London ( koji je dao nerealno lošu i visoku procjenu mortaliteta što se tiče Korone )
Činjenicu da je trenutno prvi finansijer WHO ( Gavi je već objašnjen ) koji je također dao nerealnu procjenu o Koroni
Faucija koji je također zainteresovana strana
#22942 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:52
by cvrčak_na_hedonizmu
ili Johns Hopkins Institut ( koji je također dao jako pogrešnu procjenu žrtava i uticao na dešavanje )
također, u Johns Hopkinsu u Novembru 2019 je održan Event 201 gdje se simulirala svjetska pandemija, od reakcije vlada do ponašanja medija sa posebnim osvrtom kako suzbiti "fejk njuz" preko društvenih mreža.
ili prezentacije Rokfeler Fondacije iz 2010 godine dosadnog naslova "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development" koja se također bavi pandemijom i gdje je Kina primjer borbe sa virusom. Spominje se i veća kontrola na građanima, autoritativna vlast, gubitak nekih građanskih prava itd.
wrote: ↑
However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery.
During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens....
Ono što je meni zapalo za oko jeste spominjanje uloge filantropskih organizacija kao posebna tema u dešavanjima ( zanimljivo )
ili da je Pribright Institut 2014 godine podnio zahtjev za patentiranje Korona virusa koji je odobren u Novembru 2019 - nije ovaj Korona virus, da ne bude zabune - kokoške su u pitanju
i da je Pribright Institut fnansiran od strane Gates Fondacije 2013 godine
Eto, malo sam istrražio bespuća interneta, da vidim zašto se Gates ovoliko spominje u teorijama zavjere. Ovo naravno neće nikoga ubijediti u bilo šta, ko ne vjeruje i dalje neće vjerovati, ko vjeruje - vjerovaće, ali se nadam da sam objasnio zašto se čovjek toliko spominje
Ostale zaključke možete izvući sami
#22943 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:53
by cvrčak_na_hedonizmu
Jebeni neki yt klipovi
#22944 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:55
by sumirprimus
To su ti linkovi.i famozni bil gejts.
Cipovanje 5g.
I hoce smislenu raspravu.
Otvorite kafice i teretane neizdrzivo je
#22945 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:56
by cvrčak_na_hedonizmu
sumirprimus wrote: ↑27/04/2020 15:55
To su ti linkovi.i famozni bil gejts.
Cipovanje 5g.
I hoce smislenu raspravu.
Otvorite kafice i teretane neizdrzivo je
ti ko da si nepismen, života mi. Linkovi, bujrum, svako donosi svoj zaključak i 5G se nigdje ne spominje.
#22946 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 15:59
by sumirprimus
Smijesno boga mi
Nema sve si tajne provalio aferimljudino. Nisam znao da ti je uza struka molekularna biologija.Svaka cast. Dobro sam ja reko treba vas neko za nobela predlozit
#22947 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Treba niti je opasan da ljudi padaju
Niti se siri skace po ljudima
Imamo imuni sistem koji reaguje
Kao i uvijek do sada
Ali Ako se sakrijemo
To je dobro
Jer mozemo srozati imunitet bez zraka kretanja sunca u panici u strahu bombardovani vjestima
Kortizol raste
Cekamo vakcinu za koju prvo treba u normalnim uvjetima kazu eminentni strucnjaci 5-10 godina razvoja
Ali Eto mediji kazu sad ce samo sto nije
Plus pokriva samo trenutno soj neki 10% Ako
Uspije kao vakcina protiv Gripe
A stiti najvise do 9 mjeseci
Onda nanovo
Znaci na dobro
Da smo putu
Treba da slupamo
Imunitet i sakrijemo se
To ce nam pomoci
Virus je nepoznat i apsolutno ne znas sta moze prouzrokovat kao ni da Li se dobije imunitet
Dobro Ali imajU experti koji znaju
#22949 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Posted: 27/04/2020 16:01
by Bluemore
TheWatcher wrote: ↑27/04/2020 12:02Stav Svjetske zdravstvene organizacije /WHO/ u vezi sa mjerama prevencije širenja virusa korona je da prebrzo ukidanje ograničenja može dovesti do ubojitog oživljavanja bolesti, izjavio je direktor WHO-a u BiH Victor Olsavsky.
Treba Solaka zaposlit u WHO da im papak objasni neke stvari
Nadam se da ce debil ostati u bolnici do kraja pandemije a da ce ga zamijeniti neko iz struke
Oooo scedskA ima da nahebe
Oho im se oho
#22950 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
avetinja wrote: ↑27/04/2020 12:05
Znate šta mene interesuje. Pojavio se novi virus, gotovo da se ništa ne zna o njemu, ali postoje ogromne količine testova koji detektuju virus. Kako je to moguće? Na osnovu čega se utvrdi da neko ima virus? Uz to, koliko sam upratio, samo određene zemlje imaju ogromnu količinu testova koju prodaju.
Zato sto, koliko sam upratio, koriste testove koji zapravo sluze za dokazivanje i uvecavanje postojeceg genetskog materijala ( DNA i RNA ), a ne za dijagnosticiranje Korone. To je jedan od testova i naravno da je netacan.
Al kada to napises dobijes komentar auffff ili nesto slicno