#210176 Re: Ukrajina
Posted: 19/10/2024 13:31
Uništavanje fašitičkih vojnih snaga...
Point. wrote: ↑19/10/2024 09:01Ma duša draga zabrinuta kako on brine za ZelenskogAliceInChains wrote: ↑18/10/2024 19:55Nađe se krivac, koji nije uspješno odbranio svoju državu.
Isto tako se nađe krivac, koji je bezuspješno osvajao i doveo državu do bankrota.
Pa će istorija pokazati nakon završetka konflikta. Zasad sat ne kuca baš za Zelenskija.
Ne kontam zašto te to toliko pogađa kao da ti je rođak.![]()
Ovaj vikend si baš poranio.
Opet preferiram rusku vodku. Ruski Stoli i Moskovskaya
Lako je izguglati i vidjeti
Kur*c je lako.sime_cipol wrote: ↑19/10/2024 21:59Lako je izguglati i vidjeti![]()
Najblaže rečeno, covjek je imao kontroverzne stavove.Bernardinac wrote: ↑19/10/2024 22:12Kur*c je lako.Nije mi 20 godina. I nemam kad, iskreno.
Ako ti znaš budi kolegijalan i objasni ko je lik?
Ovo izgleda kao neki fake?
Hvala Šime. Vjerujem ti, to mi je dovoljno.sime_cipol wrote: ↑19/10/2024 22:37Najblaže rečeno, covjek je imao kontroverzne stavove.Bernardinac wrote: ↑19/10/2024 22:12Kur*c je lako.Nije mi 20 godina. I nemam kad, iskreno.
Ako ti znaš budi kolegijalan i objasni ko je lik?
Ovo izgleda kao neki fake?
Razlika izmedu Stoli iz SSSR i novijih je sto je na SSSR ambalaži nagrade bile poredane vodoravno.
Google Scholar + Sci-Hub
Evo od prije nekoliko dana. Dugin je otvoreni obožavatelj jevreja.sime_cipol wrote: ↑19/10/2024 22:37Najblaže rečeno, covjek je imao kontroverzne stavove.Bernardinac wrote: ↑19/10/2024 22:12Kur*c je lako.Nije mi 20 godina. I nemam kad, iskreno.
Ako ti znaš budi kolegijalan i objasni ko je lik?
Ovo izgleda kao neki fake?
Došlo vrijeme da i ove "vojvode" šalju na prvu liniju.
Tragically, it’s more likely that I’m right, and they’re lying. Evidence for this was provided by nobody less than Zelensky. Two days ago, he took part in a conference of that fantastically democratic and transparent body named the ‘European Council’. Right after that, he provided a press conference during which he did his best to provide plentiful evidence for either his very own-, or Yermak’s (is there any difference?) illusions and dilettantism.
Essentially, Zelensky explained that Ukraine has two options: either it’s accepted as a member of NATO, or must have nuclear weapons.
(Of course, he – promptly – ‘stressed’, that prefers joining NATO….)
The first association coming to my mind was a scene of a mother and her 5- or 6-years-old kid in a toystore.
Kid: Mummy, mummy, I want that toy!
Mum: No, sorry, not this time.
Kid: But, mummy, mummy, I want that toy!
Mum: No. Come on and move.
Kid: Buuuuuuuuuaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
…
My dear Mr. President… for your information: with nukes and ‘the West’, it is like this. Either you have them, but you aren’t babbling about them in the public, or you do not babble about that topic at all. Otherwise, this kind of idiocy only has three effects:
Kursk… The problem with this Ukrainian operation is simple. So much so that Zelensky, Syrsky, and all of their glorious generals must have known certain things right from the start… except of course, they’re bigger military dilettantes than I am. Heck, the CO of the 80th Airborne knew it, which is why he quit and resigned when informed about that operation…
Itd itd...Kupyansk-Svatove… Yes, a big Russian motorcycle-mounted assault group was smshed by the 77th Airborne and the Timur UAV unit. However, the Russians have managed to enter Kruhlyakivka, and thus reach the Oskil River and cut the ZSU bridgehead into two. What’s worse, the Ukrainians now have only a half-broken bridge near the Chuihiv-Svatove highway to keep their troops in the Kupyansk bridgehead supplied….
Nuklearna bomba služi da odvratiš onoga ko je isto ima, da mu ne dozvoliš da zbog toga što je on ima a ti nemaš, tebi postavlja uslove prijeteći njom.sime_cipol wrote: ↑20/10/2024 00:18 I da ima nuklearnu bombu, sta s njom?
Baciti je? Na koga?
Imaju Rusi nuklearnu, napadnut Kursk i sta se desilo? Nista
Pa Ruska nuklearna bomba nije odvratila Ukrajince da ulete u KurskHakiz wrote: ↑20/10/2024 00:27Nuklearna bomba služi da odvratiš onoga ko je isto ima, da mu ne dozvoliš da zbog toga što je on ima a ti nemaš, tebi postavlja uslove prijeteći njom.sime_cipol wrote: ↑20/10/2024 00:18 I da ima nuklearnu bombu, sta s njom?
Baciti je? Na koga?
Imaju Rusi nuklearnu, napadnut Kursk i sta se desilo? Nista
Ne služi za napad, nego za odvraćanje.
Zato bi bilo dobro da je svi imaju. Tada bi bilo kao da je niko nema, ne bi predstavljala "argument".