Forum Klix.ba

Challenger__ wrote:

japin_mutapi wrote:sve ove godine sam mislio da USA upravlja i vuče za nos zaljevske monarhije i njihove debele i "nesposobne" kraljeve i emire ali zadnja događanja u vezi sirije i egipta me lagano razuvjeravaju u tome ...

Bitno zapažanje, vrlo, vrlo bitno zapažanje...

- Pa, bilo je tako. Imali su monopol globalne sile i nasiljem i strahom su uspostavili svoj globalni, parazitski poredak. SAD jesu upravljale svim ovim procesima i svim tim strukturama sve dok nisu prišli zidinama unutrašnjeg Damaska;

1. Damask je trougao Hezbollah-Sirija-Iran;
2. Damask je prva linija odbrane Irana, bez kojeg Kina ne bi imala potrebne resurse za svoju zahuktalu ekonomiju;
3. Damask je crvena linija ruskih geopolitičkih interesa;
4. Damask je ili suživot ili samouništenje:

- Do zidina Damaska svijet nije znao da postoje oni koji će im, po svaku cijenu, stati na put. {jada, jada, jada...}

Kikibombona wrote:Al ti volis Celendzera zamezit, malo vise nego Kalavikulu !

Abu Sakkar wrote:Imam Poslanikove džamiji, Mohammed bin Nasser Alsuhaibani, drži hutbu protiv Sisija, i vojnog udara u Egripu, daje podršku MB-u.



vjerovatno i njegov zadnji govor i zadnji dan kao imama džamije.

Dakle, nema ujedinjenog "vehabijskog fronta" protiv MB-a. Daleko od toga... Osim muftije, i par poslušnika to je to.

zlata wrote:http://mondoweiss.net/2013/08/israelis- ... enies.html

"The Israelis, whose military had close ties to General Sisi from his former post as head of military intelligence, were supporting the takeover as well. Western diplomats say that General Sisi and his circle appeared to be in heavy communication with Israeli colleagues, and the diplomats believed the Israelis were also undercutting the Western message by reassuring the Egyptians not to worry about American threats to cut off aid.

When Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, proposed an amendment halting military aid to Egypt, the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee sent a letter to senators on July 31 opposing it, saying it “could increase instability in Egypt and undermine important U.S. interests and negatively impact our Israeli ally.” Statements from influential lawmakers echoed the letter, and the Senate defeated the measure, 86 to 13, later that day."

http://mondoweiss.net/2013/08/why-is-th ... nians.html

madner wrote:Puste zelje.

Co0l wrote:
Osovina Tel Aviv-Rijad-Kairo.Taj rad

sarajevoxxxx wrote:

Co0l wrote:
Osovina Tel Aviv-Rijad-Kairo.Taj rad

- Upravo tako. Na liniji su još Amman, i svi zvaničnici iz tih gradova po jedno sto puta dnevno nazovu Vašington.

- Ovo sa sa Saudijom je vrhunac urnebesa. i sa svakom svojom novom zvaničnom izjavom diplomata iz Rijada, ista samo još više loži narod i u Egiptu i u Siriji.

- Sada već legendarne saudijske i emiratske milijarde koje su otišle vojnoj hunti, se slobodno mogu nazvati prekretnicom u arapskom proljeću.

- Osudit ću se i kazati da je taj momenat važniji čak i od pada Mursija.

Co0l wrote: Osovina Tel Aviv-Rijad-Kairo.Taj rad

Israel stays clear of Egyptian crisis, fearing Russian military’s return to a second border after Syria

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – not Israel - are lobbying the West for support of the Egyptian military. Their campaign is orchestrated by Saudi Director of Intelligence Prince Bandar Bin Sultan - not an anonymous senior Israeli official as claimed by the New York Times, debkafile’s Middle East sources report.

The prince is wielding the Russian threat (Remember the Red Peril?) as his most potent weapon for pulling Washington and Brussels behind Egypt’s military chief Gen. Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi and away from recriminations for his deadly crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood.

The veteran Saudi diplomat’s message is blunt: Failing a radical Western about-turn in favor of the Egyptian military, Cairo will turn to Moscow. In no time, Russian arms and military experts will again be swarming over Egypt, 41 years after they were thrown out by the late president Anwar Sadat in 1972. Therefore, if President Barack Obama yields to pressure and cuts off military aid to post-coup Cairo, America’s strategic partnership with this important Arab nation may go by the board.

The Israeli and Egyptian armies strictly limit their cooperation to counterterrorist action in Sinai against al Qaeda, Salafist and other terrorists threatening both countries and the Suez Canal international waterway. Even then, the IDF does not go beyond responding to Egyptian requests in cases of mutual security concern. Israel has absolutely no involvement in Gen. El-Sisi’s war on the Muslim Brotherhood.

Last Friday, Aug. 16, Putin convened his elite military and intelligence chiefs for an extraordinary meeting in the Kremlin to discuss the Saudi proposition. No decisions were reported - only a suggestive quote from Putin saying that the session was called to “discuss the situation in Egypt and take the necessary steps to the put Russian military facilities at the Egyptian military disposal.” He added that “Russia will arrange for joint military exercises with the Egyptian army.”
Both notions were left dangling without elaboration, a lure without a commitment. The New York Times of Sunday and Monday (Aug. 18-19) pushed an account of Israel’s diplomats suggesting they were fanning out across Western capitals to urge them to support Egyptian Defense Minister Gen. El-Sisi despite his suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood, with the argument: “At this point, it’s army or anarchy.”

This entire conception doesn’t hold water. From Israel’s perspective, the Bandar initiative if it takes off would lead to the undesirable consequence of a Russian military presence in Egypt as well as Syria. This would exacerbate an already fragile - if not perilous situation – closing in on Israel from the south as well as from the north.