#20526 Re: IRAN
Posted: 05/07/2019 21:38
ako ne smiju napast, onda ne trebamo ni brinut hoce li napast. 
Ni Perzijanci nisu homogeni. Veliki broj Perzijanaca prezire mulanski rezim.salik79 wrote:sto je za KIKIJA najbitnije, o HOMOGENOSTI nacije![]()
Aha, moze, mozeKikibombona wrote:Ni Perzijanci nisu homogeni. Veliki broj Perzijanaca prezire mulanski rezim.salik79 wrote:sto je za KIKIJA najbitnije, o HOMOGENOSTI nacije![]()
A kada su u pitanju iranski Kurdi, oni postuju Ameriku
https://mobile.twitter.com/MithriCastle ... 7393974275
Isto se moze reci za Arape, Beludze, Azere...
Nadzornik wrote:Izgleda da pustaju Iranski tanker...![]()
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147188611873411075

Mogu i marince, nije problemEdin H. wrote:Nadzornik wrote:Izgleda da pustaju Iranski tanker...![]()
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147188611873411075
Evo kazu da ce da spengaju engleski tanker, hajde da vidim i to cudo

Kakvi britanski marinci, to ne postoji, elitna jedinica se zove Royal Marines, to su oni sto su po nasim vukojebinama navodili NATO avione.salik79 wrote:Mogu i marince, nije problemEdin H. wrote:Nadzornik wrote:Izgleda da pustaju Iranski tanker...![]()
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147188611873411075
Evo kazu da ce da spengaju engleski tanker, hajde da vidim i to cudo![]()
Ma ja to preko Salika,on dobija masnu proviziju a ja kupim mrvice sto spadnu sa stola...jeza u ledja wrote:Koliko placa Sadra za reklamu?
Ma kakvi klosari ba,ovo su ti “Navy SEALS”...elita bajo moj...Edin H. wrote:
Ovo su ba klosari, inzinjeri i chate - Royal Navy.
Ma jasta, drogirani i pijani klosari koji su zalutali u Perzijski zaliv. Bas kao RQ 170 i RQ 4A sto su bezvezni modeli s kojima su se neka djeca igrala, a ovi im ih prizemljili, sto intaktno, sto u komadima.Edin H. wrote:Kakvi britanski marinci, to ne postoji, elitna jedinica se zove Royal Marines, to su oni sto su po nasim vukojebinama navodili NATO avione.salik79 wrote:Mogu i marince, nije problemEdin H. wrote:
Evo kazu da ce da spengaju engleski tanker, hajde da vidim i to cudo![]()
Trojicu, cetvoricu poslati da se prosetaju Iranom.
Ovo su ba klosari, inzinjeri i chate - Royal Navy.
Ako se pokazes bice i koja kriskaNadzornik wrote:Ma ja to preko Salika,on dobija masnu proviziju a ja kupim mrvice sto spadnu sa stola...jeza u ledja wrote:Koliko placa Sadra za reklamu?
Sve za Iran,Iran ni za sta...salik79 wrote: Ako se pokazes bice i koja kriska
To su AmerikanciNadzornik wrote:Ma kakvi klosari ba,ovo su ti “Navy SEALS”...elita bajo moj...Edin H. wrote:
Ovo su ba klosari, inzinjeri i chate - Royal Navy.
Nema kod Amera moje,tvoje,sve je to nase...Edin H. wrote: To su Amerikanci
Eto mundiri ko zajebaniji od amera, naravno da ce.Edin H. wrote:Nadzornik wrote:Izgleda da pustaju Iranski tanker...![]()
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1147188611873411075
Evo kazu da ce da spengaju engleski tanker, hajde da vidim i to cudo
Nadzornik wrote:Nema kod Amera moje,tvoje,sve je to nase...Edin H. wrote: To su Amerikanci
salik79 wrote:
Da sve to nije ovako, kako ovaj vojni analiticar navodi, davno bi njih Ameri napali, bez ikakvog sustezanja. Kao i sve ostale. Ali, prosli su oni "Millennium Challenge 2002" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002) i znaju da to bas i nije tako kako pojedini forumasi zamisljaju.![]()
https://www.patreon.com/posts/peter-for ... =postshare"Technically the measure will find UK Foreign Office lawyers to defend it, but other lawyers will deem the action illegal. While sending oil to Syria may be illegal under US law it is not illegal under EU law. The far-fetched justification seems to be that the Banyas oil refinery in Syria provides financial benefit to the Syrian government, is therefore subject to EU sanctions, and thus any contact with it whatever is sanctionable. An Iranian lawyer would point out that if the EU had intended its restrictions to prevent oil shipments to Syria it could easily have adopted a relevant regulation. It didn't.
For five years until now since Banyas was sanctioned tankers have been making their way past Gibraltar heading for Banyas and the UK has not seen fit to intervene. Why now?
This is obviously Hunt trying to look macho; the UK currying favour with Trump to get a better trade deal.
This will increase tension with Iran, of course, at precisely the wrong moment, when even the US by its own admission is looking for a 'workaround' for Iranian oil shipments to China. How do we think Iran is more likely to react - by meekly kowtowing, or doubling down in some way ?
Ordinary Syrians are suffering greatly because of the impact of US oil sanctions. Hospitals don't have fuel to power their generators. Car drivers have to queue for up to 12 hours to get petrol. We should be proud of ourselves.....Hunt on the Today BBC radio programme this morning refused to say if he considered fox hunting cruel. Bravo, macho man! Putting the boot into a prostrate Syria as well.
Spain may not be best pleased at this reminder of UK colonial arrogance. A spanner Macho Man has thrown into the Brexit works?"
Da, ali im Iran, stvaranjem "Osovine otpora", grebe cijelu koncepciju. Zato se i jesu uzgrebali, a napasti ne smiju.arzuhal wrote:Nakon što su, osim USA, svi potvrdili (i sve ostale potpisnice Sporazuma i IAEA) da se Iran dosad pridržavao svega potpisanog, iako se ostali nisu pridržavali, red je da i Iran počne polako ne izvršavat svoje obaveze.
Što se tiče napada na Iran, on se nikada neće desiti. Dijelom što Iran ima čime pružiti otpor, dijelom što Iran i nije stvarni cilj ni USA ni Izraela, nego arapski svijet. Iran je dobar, trajni izgovor za dovlačenje snaga na Bliski Istok, gradnju baza po arapskom svijetu, itd.