Forum Klix.ba

salik79 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:14

mO k3 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 08:15

Bluemore wrote: ↑17/04/2020 01:54
Hajd sto posta
Ali Sve neke tekstove
Linkove
Intervjue
Studije
Pa provodi
A Sve renomirani ljudi
Dobri izvori
Al djabe i mene zivcira lik nenormalNO

Ovo je vec mobing sta radite @salik79 gdje ti je@Bluemore ?? Koje YT kanale slijedite Russia Today koji jos??

Ja apsolutno uvijek navedem link na koji se pozivam, to bi do sada trebao znati!?

Ah, da, nikada ni ne pogledas, nego ad hominem komentarises.

GAU8 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:51
To se lako može objasniti. Gleda se kanal širenja virusa. Recimo da je roditelj prenio virus na dijete i dalje je dijete neko vrijeme išlo u vrtić. Ako niko od druge djece i njihovih porodica nije zaražen, ili jako malo njih, nameće se logičan zaključak da djeca loše prenose ovaj virus. Pratiš tako 100-200 takvih slučajeva i eto ti studije. Ne treba nikakav lab.

Diwan wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:07 Nije problem ni korona, niti bilo šta drugo koliko živjeti u idiotskom okruženju, podlom i nehumanom sistemu i ljudima koji su dio toga i koji to podržavaju, medijima koji ispiru mozak ljudima, lažnim vrijednostima u svim sferama, lažnim idolima, a ponajviše sa ljudima koji ništa ne shvaćaju...Hebeš ovu civilizaciju, nije ni za one stvari. Smeće obično. Možda nismo ni zaslužili bolje od onoga što bi nam se moglo desiti.

SmokingMan wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:54 Aerosol and Surface Distribution of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Hospital Wards, Wuhan, China, 2020

The main transmission routes for SARS-CoV-2 are respiratory droplets and close contact (3). Knowing the extent of environmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 wards is critical for improving safety practices for medical staff and answering questions about SARS-CoV-2 transmission among the public. However, whether SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted by aerosols remains controversial, and the exposure risk for close contacts has not been systematically evaluated. Researchers have detected SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces of objects in a symptomatic patient’s room and toilet area (4). However, that study was performed in a small sample from regions with few confirmed cases, which might not reflect real conditions in outbreak regions where hospitals are operating at full capacity. In this study, we tested surface and air samples from an intensive care unit (ICU) and a general COVID-19 ward (GW) at Huoshenshan Hospital in Wuhan, China

Conclusions
This study led to 3 conclusions. First, SARS-CoV-2 was widely distributed in the air and on object surfaces in both the ICU and GW, implying a potentially high infection risk for medical staff and other close contacts. Second, the environmental contamination was greater in the ICU than in the GW; thus, stricter protective measures should be taken by medical staff working in the ICU. Third, the SARS-CoV-2 aerosol distribution characteristics in the GW indicate that the transmission distance of SARS-CoV-2 might be 4 m.

As of March 30, no staff members at Huoshenshan Hospital had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, indicating that appropriate precautions could effectively prevent infection. In addition, our findings suggest that home isolation of persons with suspected COVID-19 might not be a good control strategy. Family members usually do not have personal protective equipment and lack professional training, which easily leads to familial cluster infections (6). During the outbreak, the government of China strove to the fullest extent possible to isolate all patients with suspected COVID-19 by actions such as constructing mobile cabin hospitals in Wuhan (7), which ensured that all patients with suspected disease were cared for by professional medical staff and that virus transmission was effectively cut off. As of the end of March, the SARS-COV-2 epidemic in China had been well controlled.

Our study has 2 limitations. First, the results of the nucleic acid test do not indicate the amount of viable virus. Second, for the unknown minimal infectious dose, the aerosol transmission distance cannot be strictly determined.

Overall, we found that the air and object surfaces in COVID-19 wards were widely contaminated by SARS-CoV-2. These findings can be used to improve safety practices.

Top

Drs. Guo, Z.Y. Wang, and S.F. Zhang are researchers at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Academy of Military Sciences in Beijing, China. Their research interests are the detection, monitoring, and risk assessment of aerosolized pathogens.

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0885_article

uglavnomja wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:03

GAU8 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:51
To se lako može objasniti. Gleda se kanal širenja virusa. Recimo da je roditelj prenio virus na dijete i dalje je dijete neko vrijeme išlo u vrtić. Ako niko od druge djece i njihovih porodica nije zaražen, ili jako malo njih, nameće se logičan zaključak da djeca loše prenose ovaj virus. Pratiš tako 100-200 takvih slučajeva i eto ti studije. Ne treba nikakav lab.

nauka se zasniva na cinjenicama, eksperimentima i to visestrukim, da bi se doslo do ozbiljnog zakljucka

ne na pretpostavkama

laik1981 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:53

malocvijece wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:47 Može jedno pitanje? Ako već niste o tome razgovarali. Nisam pratila stare postove.

Vidimo da je zaraženih preko 1000, dok je oporavljenih nešto više od 200. Zar broj oporavljenih ne bi trebao biti veći, s obzirom da je prošlo par sedmica od početka širenja zaraze kod nas, a broj umrlih je takođe relativno mali u odnosu na broj zaraženih?

Koliko dugo, u prosjeku, traje taj proces od početka zaraze do potvrđivanja ozdravljenja?

Ne testiraju ni one za koje se sumnja da su bolesni a da testiraju one koji su ozdravili.. Jos da bi za nekoga dokazao da je ozdravio moras tri testa potrositi.. Skupo je to za nase zdravstvo.. Kod ozdravljenja testiraju uglavnom one koji su bili na bolnickom lijecenju da bi ih mogli otpustiti iz bolnice.. Ovi sto su na kucnom lijecenju, ako nemaju dobru stelu, neka sacekaju jos mjesec.. Gdje im se zuri..

SmokingMan wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:05 Do tebe je kako ćeš shvatiti, za to ne snosim odgovornost...

Horcrux wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:54

salik79 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:14

mO k3 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 08:15
Ovo je vec mobing sta radite @salik79 gdje ti je@Bluemore ?? Koje YT kanale slijedite Russia Today koji jos??

Ja apsolutno uvijek navedem link na koji se pozivam, to bi do sada trebao znati!?

Ah, da, nikada ni ne pogledas, nego ad hominem komentarises.

Hajde sad ozbiljno... koliko te placaju po postu? Ili je po satu? Isplati li se?

uglavnomja wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:00 jasta cu klikati

vremenski okvir kaze da je nemoguce
naucni rad, koji obuhvata milijarde ljudi se ne moze uraditi za mjesec dana


de ba

Iran’s IRGC says its experts have, for the first time in the world, developed a smart system capable of detecting COVID-19 and other types of viruses in the surrounding environment by creating a magnetic field.

The apparatus devised by the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) was unveiled in a ceremony attended by IRGC Chief Commander Major General Hossein Salami as well as several other top military officials Wednesday.

“The apparatus can detect the virus within a distance of almost 100 metres,” said General Salami.

GAU8 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:16 Evo @salik79 da se ne brineš oko praznih bolnica u Vaterlandu
Empfehlenswerter F.A.Z. Beitrag: Spahn: ... e6?GEPC=s9
Od početka Maja vraćanje u regularni pogon.

sumirprimus wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:21

Iran’s IRGC says its experts have, for the first time in the world, developed a smart system capable of detecting COVID-19 and other types of viruses in the surrounding environment by creating a magnetic field.

The apparatus devised by the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) was unveiled in a ceremony attended by IRGC Chief Commander Major General Hossein Salami as well as several other top military officials Wednesday.

“The apparatus can detect the virus within a distance of almost 100 metres,” said General Salami.

malo smijeha

zipa mu detektora kazu podsjeca neodoljivo na one lafo detektore za mine iz iraka

salik79 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:20

uglavnomja wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:00 jasta cu klikati

vremenski okvir kaze da je nemoguce
naucni rad, koji obuhvata milijarde ljudi se ne moze uraditi za mjesec dana


de ba

Aha, a ovo sto vi postavljate i na sta se pozivate, to je vec sve naucno potkrijepljeno i dokazivo. 'ta ce levat iz St. Gallena, nasjeo na ublehu onih kengurovaca. Javi mu se, imas mail, pa mu reci da se ne provaljuje.

daddy-kool wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:23 No evidence of clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 infection and requiring oxygen: results of a study using routinely collected data to emulate a target trial

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... 1.full.pdf

salik79 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 11:17

Horcrux wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:54

salik79 wrote: ↑17/04/2020 10:14

Ja apsolutno uvijek navedem link na koji se pozivam, to bi do sada trebao znati!?

Ah, da, nikada ni ne pogledas, nego ad hominem komentarises.

Hajde sad ozbiljno... koliko te placaju po postu? Ili je po satu? Isplati li se?

Ko? Zbog cega? I, zasto se uvijek nadju likovi koji me pitaju da li sam placen za to, bila to tema o Iranu, Siriji, ili sada ova?!