Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
jastuk1 wrote:OK, onda im ostaje da se bore protiv "srditog nebića."
Pa to rade, a imaju pozamašno iskustvo, statistički su vrh svih vrhova.
A što se tiče tih anti-scenarija, OK, to je tvoja predikcija? A ja ti kažem da ćemo prije biti svjedoci radioaktivnog "prosvjetljenja" sljedbenika nebića nego tog scenarija koga pominješ.
Ovo je moja anticipacija.
____
Kazahstan... Nadam se da neće nasjesti jer "plan B" za takav scenario je krajnje nepovoljan po Kazahstan.
Što bi bio nepovoljan. Upravo suprotno. Dozvolit će im da izvoze za Pakistan i Indiju ako se Kina bude bude nešto kao protivna. Tome Kazahstan neće moći reći ne, zar ne.
Radioaktivno prosvjetljenje? Misliš dešavanje naroda usred trgova kojima nebiće vlada? Teško. Nebiće ima sve da smlavi u naletu zločina protiv čovječnosti kao Sisonja što je smlavio svoje protestante.
Podsjetnik ,kako smo ruska vnago poderali na Vozucoj i monogim drugim ratishtima shirom BiH,smrt orthodoxnim govnima koja su pokushala da porobe jednu i jedinu BiH
jastuk1 wrote:Radioaktivno prosvjetljenje? Misliš dešavanje naroda usred trgova kojima nebiće vlada? Teško. Nebiće ima sve da smlavi u naletu zločina protiv čovječnosti kao Sisonja što je smlavio svoje protestante.
jastuk1 wrote:Radioaktivno prosvjetljenje? Misliš dešavanje naroda usred trgova kojima nebiće vlada? Teško. Nebiće ima sve da smlavi u naletu zločina protiv čovječnosti kao Sisonja što je smlavio svoje protestante.
Ma kakvo dešavanje naroda, nema od tog ništa.
Pa ne znam šta si mislio pod tim? Kako će se nebiće urušiti, uništiti? Nisi valjda radioaktivno bukvalan? LOL
jastuk1 wrote:Pa ne znam šta si mislio pod tim? Kako će se nebiće urušiti, uništiti? Nisi valjda radioaktivno bukvalan? LOL
Pa ko je rekao da će se nebiće ukinuti radiijacijom? Dok se ne desi njegova epifanija to je nemoguće. Pričao sam o budaletinama koje su umislile da će doći u posjed tuđih resursa: prije će oni dožvijeti Ra-iluminaciju ( ) nego što će ovi izgubti resurse.
nedelja 4.01.2015.
Rusi će ove godine letovati - u Sibiru
| siberiantimes.com
Zbog sankcija Zapada, mnogi Rusi su se tokom prethodne godine odlučivali za domaće destinacije, zbog čega je najveći procvat doživela regija uz Bajkalsko jezero.
shibonja wrote:Podsjetnik ,kako smo ruska vnago poderali na Vozucoj i monogim drugim ratishtima shirom BiH,smrt orthodoxnim govnima koja su pokushala da porobe jednu i jedinu BiH
Ortodoxni kažu da su se na toj Vozućoj borili protiv prethodnika ISIS-a. Kakav dvoboj titana, kakva avangarda
shibonja wrote:Podsjetnik ,kako smo ruska vnago poderali na Vozucoj i monogim drugim ratishtima shirom BiH,smrt orthodoxnim govnima koja su pokushala da porobe jednu i jedinu BiH
Ne prati to Denis, njemu su sahovske figure bitne.
shibonja wrote:Podsjetnik ,kako smo ruska vnago poderali na Vozucoj i monogim drugim ratishtima shirom BiH,smrt orthodoxnim govnima koja su pokushala da porobe jednu i jedinu BiH
Ocigledan primjer bolesne osobe kojoj ni Torabijeva vodica, a ni hodza iz Dubokog Potoka nebi pomogla da izlijeci svoje bolesne frustracije. Reci nam "garonjo" iz koje si se vukojebine sljegao u Tuzlu.
Lijeci se care dok jos mozes......iskreno ti savjetuje pripadnik "Tabut brigade"
kad bi situacija u rusiji bila imalo kritična, rusi bi već udarili novi set sankcija zapadu.
ali nije.
rusija je iskoristila, ako što je netko primijetio, situaciju sa rubljom i pokupovala sve što je mogla od ruskih poduzeća u djelomičnom vlasništvu stranaca. preko 20 mlrd dolara. u padu rublje, sama rusija je sudjelovala sa preko 50%. ona je ta koja je djelomično i inscenirala ovo. na prvi pogled, rusija je teško stradala od sankcija. ali, cijena nafte nije jedino što rusima puni proračun. oni još uvijek nemaju porez na dobit koju izvlače strane kompanije. od 130 mlrd godišnje, samo 10% poreza bude u blagajnu nabacilo 13 mlrd. taman da pokrije manjak od prihoda od nafte.
ne zaboravite da se trgovinska razmjena amerike i rusije povećala 7% u 2014. godini.
ne zaboravite da američka vojska ove godine mora moliti ruse da im dignu koji satelit na visinu veću od mt everesta.
sva ta kriza ima za cilj pozornost europe skrenuti s ključnih stvari u pregovorima oko transatlantskog sporazuma, kojima će eu države izgubiti mogućnsot da donose zakone kojima se umanjuje planirana dobit korporacija. znači, nema novih poreza na telekom usluge, ili ograničenja za montsanto.
glavno pitanje ove godine je i ukrajina. ima li zapad 30 mlrd dolara za dati, ne posuditi, ukrajini.
jer bez barem 15 mlrd dolara ove godine od ukrajine će ostati samo slova. nepovezana, razbanaa.
btw. vele da na krimu ove godine bude puno turista. a u sočiju je za doček bilo 200% više gostiju nego prošle godine.
ford proširuje tvornicu u rusiji.
gm povećava proizvodnju u sankt peterburgu.
exxon sa rusima nastavlja poslovne pothvate.
francuski total, unatoč smrti direktora na aerodromu, je omdah poslao novog šefa u moskvu.
velike stvari se dogovaraju, i događaju.
a vi se zabavljate cirkusom u šumi, a ne vidite drveće koje raste i kakve plodove ima.
shvatite već jednom da svijetom upravljaju korporacije, od kojih je najveća kina.
nosara wrote:ne zaboravite da američka vojska ove godine mora moliti ruse da im dignu koji satelit na visinu veću od mt everesta.
Trenutno USA ima na raspolaganju +20 verzija raketa za lansiranje satelita. Uglavnom iz Atlas i Delta obitelji raketa. Što specijaliziranih za vojsku i obavještajne službe, što za NASU, što za komercijalna lansiranja. Dobar dio njih je značajno ispred ičega što Rusija ima, bar po teretu koji može lansirati. Najjača od njih (po teretu koji se može smjestiti u LEO - low earth orbit) je Delta IV (Delta 9000). Rusija skoro sva svoja lansiranja obavlja sa Proton.
Također, USA je jedina zemlja koja u razvoju ima lansere sposobne slati velike terete i van orbite, SLS.
Ruski pokušaji ovoga su se završili sa 4. eksplozijom N1 rakete, još za vrijeme SSSRa. Drugi pokušaj lansiranja N1 1969. je rezultirao u najvećoj nenuklearnoj eksploziji koju je ljudski rod ikada proizveo. Nema naznake da Rusija razvija išta blizu ovome.
USA je također jedina zemlja gdje i privatne firme imaju svoje lansere i šalju teret u orbitu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9_v1.1
2015. će vjerojatno biti 2 firme koje ovo rade.
Zapravo, USA privatnici razvijaju rakete koje imaju značajno više potencijala nego ijedna Ruska raketa trenutno u službi ili u razvoju http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_Heavy
Najbolje što Rusija ima je Angara, koja je još u razvoju i više je no 50% slabija po svim parametrima od ovog iznad
A ostatak ovih gluposti zaista nemam volje komentirat
nosara wrote:ne zaboravite da američka vojska ove godine mora moliti ruse da im dignu koji satelit na visinu veću od mt everesta.
Trenutno USA ima na raspolaganju +20 verzija raketa za lansiranje satelita. Uglavnom iz Atlas i Delta obitelji raketa. Što specijaliziranih za vojsku i obavještajne službe, što za NASU, što za komercijalna lansiranja. Dobar dio njih je značajno ispred ičega što Rusija ima, bar po teretu koji može lansirati. Najjača od njih (po teretu koji se može smjestiti u LEO - low earth orbit) je Delta IV (Delta 9000). Rusija skoro sva svoja lansiranja obavlja sa Proton.
Također, USA je jedina zemlja koja u razvoju ima lansere sposobne slati velike terete i van orbite, SLS.
Ruski pokušaji ovoga su se završili sa 4. eksplozijom N1 rakete, još za vrijeme SSSRa. Drugi pokušaj lansiranja N1 1969. je rezultirao u najvećoj nenuklearnoj eksploziji koju je ljudski rod ikada proizveo. Nema naznake da Rusija razvija išta blizu ovome.
USA je također jedina zemlja gdje i privatne firme imaju svoje lansere i šalju teret u orbitu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9_v1.1
2015. će vjerojatno biti 2 firme koje ovo rade.
Zapravo, USA privatnici razvijaju rakete koje imaju značajno više potencijala nego ijedna Ruska raketa trenutno u službi ili u razvoju http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_Heavy
Najbolje što Rusija ima je Angara, koja je još u razvoju i više je no 50% slabija po svim parametrima od ovog iznad
A ostatak ovih gluposti zaista nemam volje komentirat
A compromise defense policy bill in Congress would bar the purchase of more Russian-made rocket engines to launch U.S. military satellites, clearing the way for competitive bids for 14 future launches, senior congressional aides said on Tuesday.
The proposal is one of several new agreements included in a compromise version of the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) filed in the House of Representatives and expected to be debated as early as this week.
The NDAA, which is approved annually, sets U.S. defense policy and authorizes spending levels but does not actually appropriate funds. It has to be approved by both chambers before going to President Barack Obama for his signature. Lawmakers will be asked to approve it without amendments, the aides said.
The measure authorizes a base defense budget of $521 billion, including $17.9 billion for Department of Energy nuclear weapons work, the aides said on condition of anonymity.
It also authorizes $63.7 billion in spending on the U.S. war in Afghanistan and the fight against Islamic State rebels in Iraq and Syria. The aides said the funding was at the level sought by the president.
The bill would bar United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint venture of Boeing Co and Lockheed Martin Corp, from using Russian RD-180 engines to send U.S. military and intelligence satellites into space unless they were bought before Moscow’s invasion of the Crimean peninsula this year.
Already controversial, the supply deal came under new klix in November, when Reuters reported that a klix company half-owned by Russian engine maker Energomash stands to receive $93 million in cost mark-ups under an RD-180 contract. Those charges are being added to the program despite a 2011 Pentagon audit that contested a similar, earlier contract with the middleman company, Florida-based RD Amross.
“Those engines that were already procured under contract at the time of the Crimea invasion are allowed to be used,” said one aide. “Anything subsequent to that cannot be used.”
Heightened tensions between Russia and the U.S. are hampering their cooperation in space, adding to the problems of an American space industry reeling from the crashes of two commercial spacecraft this fall.
Russia is a critical player in the business of carrying payloads into orbit, from communications satellites for Western companies to American astronauts traveling to the international space station.
But after Moscow grabbed Crimea from Ukraine in March, the U.S. State Department temporarily stopped issuing licenses for exporting sensitive defense-related technologies to Russia, including satellites, as part of broader sanctions imposed against the Kremlin. And in September, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announced plans for two U.S. companies to build spacecraft to carry American astronauts to the space station, reducing its reliance on Russia.
“U.S. Spy Satellites Riding Russian Rockets into Space
In light of Russia’s de facto annexation of the Ukraine’s Crimea region and the formal severing of military ties,” said Musk, “the Atlas V cannot possibly be described as providing ‘assured access to space’ for our nation when supply of the main engine depends on President Putin’s permission.”
According to industry sources, at least eight of the NRO’s spy satellites launched since 2007 have gone up on top of the Russian-built rockets.
shibonja wrote:Podsjetnik ,kako smo ruska vnago poderali na Vozucoj i monogim drugim ratishtima shirom BiH,smrt orthodoxnim govnima koja su pokushala da porobe jednu i jedinu BiH
Ocigledan primjer bolesne osobe kojoj ni Torabijeva vodica, a ni hodza iz Dubokog Potoka nebi pomogla da izlijeci svoje bolesne frustracije. Reci nam "garonjo" iz koje si se vukojebine sljegao u Tuzlu.
Lijeci se care dok jos mozes......iskreno ti savjetuje pripadnik "Tabut brigade"
Tesko je to kad se nadjes u shibonjinom postu.
Hajd' sto boli, neg' jos tukne na bijeli luk i slaninu.
US Too Dependent on Russian Rocket Engines, Experts Tell Lawmakers
United Launch Alliance's (ULA) Atlas 5 rocket is the workhorse of heavy satellite launches in the United States, but the booster requires a Russian RD-180 engine to get off the ground.
LDLT wrote:Atlas V koristi jedan RD-180 u prvoj fazi, točno. I to je to. Ne mijenja poantu ičega šta sam napisao.
Svi ostali - Merlin, Rocketdyne..
Amerika da treba tamo neku fucking Rusiju za lansiranje satelita u svemir ? Ono, zaista ?
Russia’s Security Council is reportedly considering a ban on supplying the US with powerful RD-180 rocket engines for military communications satellites as Russia focuses on building its own new space launch center, Vostochny, in the Far East.
A ban on the rockets supply to the US heavy booster, Atlas V, which delivers weighty military communications satellites and deep space exploration vehicles into orbit, could impact NASA’s space programs – not just military satellite launches.
An unnamed representative of Russia’s Federal Space Agency told the Izvestia newspaper that the Security Council is reconsidering the role of Russia’s space industry in the American space exploration program, particularly the 2012 contract to deliver the US heavy-duty RD-180 rocket engines.
Previously, Moscow has not objected to the fact that America’s Atlas V boosters, rigged with Russian rocket engines, deliver advanced space armament systems into orbit. If a ban were to be put in place, however, engine delivery to the US would probably stop altogether, beginning in 2015.
U.S. military reliance on Russian rocket raises security fears
The rising tensions with Russia over its aggression in Ukraine is creating national security concerns inside the Pentagon, where the military’s largest satellite program is reliant on a rocket engine produced by Moscow.
The Air Force said it has begun looking for alternatives to the RD-180 rocket engines for its Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program — the fourth largest line item in the U.S. defense budget — now that Russia has threatened to cut off the technology in its tit-for-tat struggle with the U.S.
“What were we thinking? It’s clear now that relying on Russia for rocket engines was a policy based on hope, not good judgment,” said Michael V. Hayden, a four-star Air Force general who headed the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency before his retirement in 2009.
Russian Space Program Pushes Ahead, While U.S. Back-Tracks On Sanctions
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced last year that Russia's space program would receive a record-setting $52 billion over the next six years, to revitalize its aerospace industry, and develop new infrastructure and capabilities for exploration beyond 2020. Last week, Dmitry Rogozin made reference to a new long-term plan for space, and some details were "quietly" released on May 13, which were overshadowed in the press by his remarks responding to the U.S. sanctions.
According to The Moscow Times, this long-overdue modernization effort, which was made urgent by last week's fifth Proton rocket failure since December 2010, will include the renovation of Russia's old launch facility at Plesetsk, used mainly for military payloads, and the launch facility at Baikonur, in Kazakstan, which carries out all manned missions. The modernization effort will also include an expanded constellation of Earth-orbiting satellites, both military and commercial; the construction of the new Far East launch complex at Vostochny; and modernized industrial rocket and related technology development.
Meanwhile, following a near-panic in the U.S. aerospace industry, which has billions of dollars at stake, after the Administration announced that export licenses for U.S. commercial satellites for launch by Russia would be halted, the State Department has issued shipping licenses for two communications satellites to Baikonur. Also, two European Galileo navigation satellites, which contain U.S. components, were shipped for Russian-rocket launch by the European Space Agency.
On May 15, Roscosmos official Valery Zaichko told Interfax that an embargo on parts for Russian satellites will not affect his agency's plans to develop a new generation of remote sensing satellites. (Russia now imports advanced electronics for its satellites.) "Foreign parts are being used, but cannot affect our plans," he said. "Russia is taking all measures to switch to a domestic component base."
And while the U.S. fiddles on resolving a dispute over allowing Russian Glonass navigational satellite ground stations to be placed in the U.S., as the U.S. has stations for its GPS system in the Russian Federation, Iran announced that it will host a Glonass station, which will increase the accuracy and reliability of the Russian nevigational satellites.
U.S. sanctions on China to prohibit the export to China of any aerospace hardware, and cooperation in civilian space activity, has only advanced China's efforts to independently develop its own capabilities. Sanctions on Russia will, similarly, accelerate the modernization and upgrading of its aerospace industry.
) nego što će ovi izgubti resurse.
