Forum Klix.ba

salik79 wrote:

славянин wrote: OR FAR OUT, nemoj da ti "ispadaju" rijeci

But can you use night vision scopes during the day? Shortly answered – NO they cannot be used during the day.

In every case when using night vision scopes and other devices, the requirement is as mentioned the ambient light provided from the moon and starlight to produce an image. When talking during the day, even the smallest shadow will make those devices unusable. Modern night vision optics and scopes come with a built-in infrared light illuminator that cannot function properly during the day.

When talking about thermal night vision scopes – the principle of the thermal system is that it detects objects that radiate heat. But when sunlight is present, the thermal vision gets very confused and the user will see nothing but unrecognizable bright light, if used during the day. The image intensification tubes used for the external light sources are very sensitive and can easily be permanently damaged if exposed to a bright light – the sun light, that is why night vision scopes cannot be used during the day, only in the night.

Hajmo dalje.

he word FLIR is a US Military Acronym that officially stands for Forward Looking Infrared Radar although in common usage it has generally been changed to Forward Looking InfraRed. The term originated with airborne thermal imaging units that were angled to look forward. It has since been in public knowledge as meaning any thermal infrared imaging camera that is used. There is even a major manufacturer in the industry that borrowed the acronym. They are known as FLIR Systems Inc. and they manufacture every type of infrared camera there is.

FLIR imaging is a night vision technology used in operation desert storm war and now being used currently in operation desert fox in the Persian gulf. Thermal imaging is used not only for surveillance but for target acquisition and tracking.
Helicopters (apache) have forward looking infrared units mounted on them that can give the pilot a thermal picture miles ahead of the aircraft. Fighter planes (F-16, F-14, F-15, F-18, stealth fighter, tomcat, etc.) use thermal infrared imaging to locate and control fire to specific targets. Even some of the missiles being fired at the Iraqi’s are guided with infrared technology ( heat seeking missile ).

Thermal energy is transmitted in the infrared wavelength ( 1 micron to 100 microns ). You can see by the image above that thermal energy is closely related to visible light in that it travels in a wave. Thermal ir imaging takes traditional light amplification night vision devices ( the green images you see on TV) one step farther. The human eye can only see the narrow middle band of visible light that encompasses all the colors of light in the rainbow.
Thermal infrared imagers translate the energy transmitted in the infrared wavelength into data that can be processed into a visible light spectrum video display. Visible light is dependent on a light source ( the sun or artificial ) reflecting off an object to be received by our eyes.

Remember, all objects above 0 degrees Kelvin emit thermal infrared energy so thermal imagers can passively see all objects regardless of ambient light. This can give you an enormous advantage on the battle field, especially in the persian gulf wars (operation desert storm and operation desert fox). Advances in stealth technology have not only concentrated on creating battle field machines that are hard to see with radar, but they have also drastically reduced the thermal infra red signature. This signature is what allows thermally guided missiles to home in on there targets. The thermal infrared heat signature also allows ground and air forces to track enemy movement of large resources (tanks, planes, vehicles, etc.). Today’s battle field machines have reduced the thermal signature ( mainly by cooling the exhaust and insulating the heat producing parts ) to a level that is much harder to detect. But they are not invisible! With thermal infrared imagers military hardware, transport vehicles, machines and humans stick vastly. You can defeat traditional night vision device but you simply cannot hide completely from thermal infrared imaging technology. Not even Saddam Huisein can hide.

славянин wrote:

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Mnogo taj tjelohranitelj sejka zna, recimo saudijci imaju 20 + hiljada princeva a koliko tek sejkova Kakav cilj moze biti Kina ? Zapad i Kina ovise jedni o drugim,vojni sukob je van opcije... malo povuci potegni naravno ima ali nista sto moze se kvalifikovati kao neko neprijateljstvo.Uzimajuci o obzir da se radi o 2 supersile zapravo imaju iznenadjujuce dobre odnose..

славянин wrote:Pa vjerujem ja tebi da je taj tjelohranitelj sejku - samo sto sumnjam da sejk zna nesto toliko tajno i onda to dijeli i prica okolo

Bosanski_kralj wrote:Posada broda izjavljuje da su vidjeli leteće objekte, a Ameri govore o minama. Ko tu sad laže?

mO k3 wrote:

славянин wrote:Pa vjerujem ja tebi da je taj tjelohranitelj sejku - samo sto sumnjam da sejk zna nesto toliko tajno i onda to dijeli i prica okolo

Ja mislim da to nije bas tajno nego mi sa balkana na gledamo šire nego od Irana

славянин wrote:

salik79 wrote:

славянин wrote: OR FAR OUT, nemoj da ti "ispadaju" rijeci

But can you use night vision scopes during the day? Shortly answered – NO they cannot be used during the day.

In every case when using night vision scopes and other devices, the requirement is as mentioned the ambient light provided from the moon and starlight to produce an image. When talking during the day, even the smallest shadow will make those devices unusable. Modern night vision optics and scopes come with a built-in infrared light illuminator that cannot function properly during the day.

When talking about thermal night vision scopes – the principle of the thermal system is that it detects objects that radiate heat. But when sunlight is present, the thermal vision gets very confused and the user will see nothing but unrecognizable bright light, if used during the day. The image intensification tubes used for the external light sources are very sensitive and can easily be permanently damaged if exposed to a bright light – the sun light, that is why night vision scopes cannot be used during the day, only in the night.

Hajmo dalje.

Opet ti gdje ti nije mjesto

https://www.x20.org/knowledgebase/flir-imaging-works/

he word FLIR is a US Military Acronym that officially stands for Forward Looking Infrared Radar although in common usage it has generally been changed to Forward Looking InfraRed. The term originated with airborne thermal imaging units that were angled to look forward. It has since been in public knowledge as meaning any thermal infrared imaging camera that is used. There is even a major manufacturer in the industry that borrowed the acronym. They are known as FLIR Systems Inc. and they manufacture every type of infrared camera there is.

FLIR imaging is a night vision technology used in operation desert storm war and now being used currently in operation desert fox in the Persian gulf. Thermal imaging is used not only for surveillance but for target acquisition and tracking.
Helicopters (apache) have forward looking infrared units mounted on them that can give the pilot a thermal picture miles ahead of the aircraft. Fighter planes (F-16, F-14, F-15, F-18, stealth fighter, tomcat, etc.) use thermal infrared imaging to locate and control fire to specific targets. Even some of the missiles being fired at the Iraqi’s are guided with infrared technology ( heat seeking missile ).

Thermal energy is transmitted in the infrared wavelength ( 1 micron to 100 microns ). You can see by the image above that thermal energy is closely related to visible light in that it travels in a wave. Thermal ir imaging takes traditional light amplification night vision devices ( the green images you see on TV) one step farther. The human eye can only see the narrow middle band of visible light that encompasses all the colors of light in the rainbow.
Thermal infrared imagers translate the energy transmitted in the infrared wavelength into data that can be processed into a visible light spectrum video display. Visible light is dependent on a light source ( the sun or artificial ) reflecting off an object to be received by our eyes.

Remember, all objects above 0 degrees Kelvin emit thermal infrared energy so thermal imagers can passively see all objects regardless of ambient light. This can give you an enormous advantage on the battle field, especially in the persian gulf wars (operation desert storm and operation desert fox). Advances in stealth technology have not only concentrated on creating battle field machines that are hard to see with radar, but they have also drastically reduced the thermal infra red signature. This signature is what allows thermally guided missiles to home in on there targets. The thermal infrared heat signature also allows ground and air forces to track enemy movement of large resources (tanks, planes, vehicles, etc.). Today’s battle field machines have reduced the thermal signature ( mainly by cooling the exhaust and insulating the heat producing parts ) to a level that is much harder to detect. But they are not invisible! With thermal infrared imagers military hardware, transport vehicles, machines and humans stick vastly. You can defeat traditional night vision device but you simply cannot hide completely from thermal infrared imaging technology. Not even Saddam Huisein can hide.

salik79 wrote:
Trpanje gdje mu nije mjesto je tvoja specijalnost. Gdje u ovome, sto si citirao, stoji da se koristi danju, a pogotovo iznad mora gdje je odbljesak Sunca nekoliko puta veci? To bi samo kompletni idiot mogao koristiti.

Nauci nesto od znalaca:
https://nightvisioninsider.com/can-you- ... g-the-day/

So basically – is every single night vision technology unusable during the day?

With most night vision technologies, this is the case. The normal night vision scopes cannot operate during the day at all and most thermal night vision optics give the user a very bright confusing picture. But is not like there isn’t any single night vision scope that CANNOT be used during the day also. The problem is that the image intensifier tubes used in conventional night vision devices, when exposed during the daylight, as mentioned give a very confusing picture and can basically overheat and get permanently damaged if exposed to bright sunlight. To prevent this case, there are expensive additions like auto-gating that protects the thermal night vision scope so that the image intensifier tube will basically SHUT DOWN itself when exposed to damaging daylight or bright lights. The further-developed FLIR technology does not have those problems actually.

Challenger_ wrote:

salik79 wrote:Nije ovo iranska nego americka i od strucnjaka iz cijelog svijeta.

Mislis onaj sto je ispario u Pensilvaniji?!

Ma zezam se buraz. Kao, WTC 7 i Pentagon srušio nevidljivi avion. Zato se ne vidi, je li.

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Vizionar 1985 wrote:

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Pisao ja o tome ovdje da proksi rat i igranku Kini prirediti mogu preko dzihadista u borbi za prava Ujgura, pa cak i Talibana. A odmah sta ja znam, podavit ce ih Zuti itd.

Ja vrtio SBB, KBB scenario, i po meni nije nevjerovatan.

Da nisam ja taj bodyguard.

Nove informacije pobijaju američku teoriju o minama? Predsjednik kompanije u čijem je vlasništvu pogođeni tanker u Omanskom zaljevu tvrdi: "Neposredno pred udar posada je vidjela leteće objekte"

Japanska kompanija Kokuka Sangyo, koja je vlasnik tankera "Kokuka Courageous", jednog od dva na kojima je jučer u blizini Hormuškog tjesnaca izbila eksplozija, otkriva neke detalje koji bi mogli baciti sasvim drugačije svjetlo na jučerašnji incident. Predsjednik kompanije, Yutaka Katada, poručio je kako je posada uočila "leteće objekte" neposredno prije napada u Omanskom zaljevu - podsjetimo, SAD tvrdi kako je Iran izveo napade na tankere minama.

Kokuka Sangyo navodi kako je tanker pogođen dva puta - prvo u blizini strojarnice, a zatim i s vanjske strane broda. Ističe kako su neki projektili, meci, pogodili brod, te tvrdi kako su informacije o mini "pogrešne". Također napominje kako je brod pogođen iznad razine mora, što bi značilo da nije moguće da ga je pogodila mina.

Podsjetimo, riječ je o istom tankeru za kojeg američka vojska tvrdi da je pogođen minom - štoviše, iz američke vojske objavili su snimku za koju tvrde kako prikazuje pripadnike Iranske revolucionarne garde koji su se približili svojim manjim brodom tankeru te su "s trupa uklonili jednu minu koja nije eksplodirala". Riječ je o snimci poprilično loše kvalitete.

славянин wrote:

Vizionar 1985 wrote:

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Pisao ja o tome ovdje da proksi rat i igranku Kini prirediti mogu preko dzihadista u borbi za prava Ujgura, pa cak i Talibana. A odmah sta ja znam, podavit ce ih Zuti itd.

Ja vrtio SBB, KBB scenario, i po meni nije nevjerovatan.

Da nisam ja taj bodyguard.

A kako bi to izgledalo ? Vidis da kod kineza nema ljudska prava,sloboda ovog i onog nego 6 mil ljudi interniraju

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Jest fazon dovesti ove razne skupine da u Kineska pogranicna podrucja upadaju iz recimo Afganistana u Kinu, pa navuci Kinu da intervenise i ona u Afganistanu pa i u ostalim okolnim drzavama iz kojih bi se ovi upadi u Kinu desavali.

Challenger_ wrote:

Nove informacije pobijaju američku teoriju o minama? Predsjednik kompanije u čijem je vlasništvu pogođeni tanker u Omanskom zaljevu tvrdi: "Neposredno pred udar posada je vidjela leteće objekte"

Japanska kompanija Kokuka Sangyo, koja je vlasnik tankera "Kokuka Courageous", jednog od dva na kojima je jučer u blizini Hormuškog tjesnaca izbila eksplozija, otkriva neke detalje koji bi mogli baciti sasvim drugačije svjetlo na jučerašnji incident. Predsjednik kompanije, Yutaka Katada, poručio je kako je posada uočila "leteće objekte" neposredno prije napada u Omanskom zaljevu - podsjetimo, SAD tvrdi kako je Iran izveo napade na tankere minama.

Kokuka Sangyo navodi kako je tanker pogođen dva puta - prvo u blizini strojarnice, a zatim i s vanjske strane broda. Ističe kako su neki projektili, meci, pogodili brod, te tvrdi kako su informacije o mini "pogrešne". Također napominje kako je brod pogođen iznad razine mora, što bi značilo da nije moguće da ga je pogodila mina.

Podsjetimo, riječ je o istom tankeru za kojeg američka vojska tvrdi da je pogođen minom - štoviše, iz američke vojske objavili su snimku za koju tvrde kako prikazuje pripadnike Iranske revolucionarne garde koji su se približili svojim manjim brodom tankeru te su "s trupa uklonili jednu minu koja nije eksplodirala". Riječ je o snimci poprilično loše kvalitete.

славянин wrote:

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Jest fazon dovesti ove razne skupine da u Kineska pogranicna podrucja upadaju iz recimo Afganistana u Kinu, pa navuci Kinu da intervenise i ona u Afganistanu pa i u ostalim okolnim drzavama iz kojih bi se ovi upadi u Kinu desavali.

I kinezi bi ti uletili 30 km pocistili sve pred sobom onda avionima,dronovima itd nadgledali teren nakon povlacenja i rokali po svemu sto dise. Sto se Tibet ne buni ili nesto ne pokusava vojno ili Ujguri.. jer znaju da ovi se ne osvrcu na misljenje ovih ili onih.

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Presumcija ti je pogresna. Ti mislis da se ovima jb za Ujgurima itd. Zrtvovali bi ih da suknu Kini. Pa nece Kina sa citavim Islamskim svijetom zaratiti.

Jb se ovima za Ujgure itd. Dokaza za to da im se jb za narod bruka.

Kako je Tudzman govorio. St*ka sitnog zuba.

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

славянин wrote:

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Presumcija ti je pogresna. Ti mislis da se ovima jb za Ujgurima itd. Zrtvovali bi ih da suknu Kini. Pa nece Kina sa citavim Islamskim svijetom zaratiti.

Jb se ovima za Ujgure itd. Dokaza za to da im se jb za narod bruka.

Kako je Tudzman govorio. St*ka sitnog zuba.

Izlazis iz okvira realnog, Kinezi ne funkcionisu kao sto smo mi navikli ovamo da drzava funkcionise, oni zatvore kazem ti 6 miliona ljudi jer osjete da su se uzvrtili.Ko ce ih napasti preko granice ??

stakasa wrote:

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Joj Moke, pa djelovo si ozbiljniji...

mO k3 wrote:

stakasa wrote:

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Joj Moke, pa djelovo si ozbiljniji...

Ozbiljno .... kako god priča zvuci sf , ali je tako


Vidi od koje zemlje kina uzima najviše nafte ?
Koja ekonomija je za USA ekonomiju najveća pretnja ??

mO k3 wrote:

stakasa wrote:

mO k3 wrote:Upravo sam na odmoru i koliko imam sreće upoznam u hotelu tjelohranitelja od jednog šeika koji je sada u Bosni živi (pisali su naše novine o dotičnim ) i on mi kaže cilj dugoročno gledano nije Iran nego kina

Joj Moke, pa djelovo si ozbiljniji...

Ozbiljno .... kako god priča zvuci sf , ali je tako


Vidi od koje zemlje kina uzima najviše nafte ?
Koja ekonomija je za USA ekonomiju najveća pretnja ??

During his conversation with Professor Susan Shirk, chair of the 21st Century China Center, Tsai cited three major factors – trade, business and intellectual capital – that have contributed to the current landscape and tension between the two countries, as well as their independency, such as the 68,000 American companies operating in China that create $600 billion in revenue each year.