Mozda skidaju malo vise sa Aparatamanuchao91 wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:34 kako mislis opadaju
danas im vise zarazenih nego jucer i vise mrtvih nego jucer
Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Moderator: O'zone
- Bluemore
- Posts: 4375
- Joined: 18/06/2010 21:18
#18801 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
- Bluemore
- Posts: 4375
- Joined: 18/06/2010 21:18
#18802 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Evo malo humora Nema titla ali Mozda bude
- mO k3
- Posts: 34082
- Joined: 23/09/2009 14:16
- Location: https://youtu.be/xk7QKTXQGbg
#18803 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
@Bluemore dominira svojim neznanjem
djevojčice sta je bilo nešto si mi uzrujana ovih dana , neznas kuda udaraš
Sada te stvarno stavljam na ignore listu
Sada te stvarno stavljam na ignore listu
- Industrialyzer
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: 11/06/2011 23:51
#18804 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Zabraniti komentarisanje ljudima koji nemaju bar osnovno obrazovanje o mikrobima, virusima, nacinu zivota, strukturi i nacinu sirenja.manuchao91 wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:40 nekako mi se čini da ovo sa Italijom predugo traje
pa jbt od pocetka februara počinje sranje a evo opet danas porast ,ne kontam...
oni da izadju iz izolacije treba jos minimalno 10 dana da broj novozarazenih bude ispod 1000 ...
a ne ovako jedan dan 3800 sutra 4200 pa spane na 3000 pa se digne na 3600 pa onda 3900 nidje veze
USA kriticna
FRA sljedece zariste
Po mom misljenju ove objave svako 24h bi trebale ici na min. 72h jer se tada dobije mnogo jasnija slika. Cak bi bilo idealno dobiti jedan "presjek" u 5 dana.
- manuchao91
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: 14/01/2019 20:28
- Location: Tenerife ,Spain
#18805 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
izvini doktore bio sam naivanIndustrialyzer wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:58Zabraniti komentarisanje ljudima koji nemaju bar osnovno obrazovanje o mikrobima, virusima, nacinu zivota, strukturi i nacinu sirenja.manuchao91 wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:40 nekako mi se čini da ovo sa Italijom predugo traje
pa jbt od pocetka februara počinje sranje a evo opet danas porast ,ne kontam...
oni da izadju iz izolacije treba jos minimalno 10 dana da broj novozarazenih bude ispod 1000 ...
a ne ovako jedan dan 3800 sutra 4200 pa spane na 3000 pa se digne na 3600 pa onda 3900 nidje veze
USA kriticna
FRA sljedece zariste
Po mom misljenju ove objave svako 24h bi trebale ici na min. 72h jer se tada dobije mnogo jasnija slika. Cak bi bilo idealno dobiti jedan "presjek" u 5 dana.
- Lincoln-Burrows
- Posts: 7583
- Joined: 22/01/2008 18:17
#18806 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Samo nemoj zabraniti, dovoljno imamo zabrana, svih u stanove sabilo.Industrialyzer wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:58Zabraniti komentarisanje ljudima koji nemaju bar osnovno obrazovanje o mikrobima, virusima, nacinu zivota, strukturi i nacinu sirenja.manuchao91 wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:40 nekako mi se čini da ovo sa Italijom predugo traje
pa jbt od pocetka februara počinje sranje a evo opet danas porast ,ne kontam...
oni da izadju iz izolacije treba jos minimalno 10 dana da broj novozarazenih bude ispod 1000 ...
a ne ovako jedan dan 3800 sutra 4200 pa spane na 3000 pa se digne na 3600 pa onda 3900 nidje veze
USA kriticna
FRA sljedece zariste
Po mom misljenju ove objave svako 24h bi trebale ici na min. 72h jer se tada dobije mnogo jasnija slika. Cak bi bilo idealno dobiti jedan "presjek" u 5 dana.
- Industrialyzer
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: 11/06/2011 23:51
#18807 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Nisam doktor, ali cu prihvatiti izvinjenje. Strukom sam vrlo blizak ovoj materiji i svjestan sam koliko ne znam, ali isto tako i koliko znam. Mnogi nisu u stanju procitati grafikon na pravi nacin. Ne krivim nikoga, ali onda zaista od komentara takvih osoba nista dobro ne moze izaci.manuchao91 wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:05izvini doktore bio sam naivanIndustrialyzer wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:58Zabraniti komentarisanje ljudima koji nemaju bar osnovno obrazovanje o mikrobima, virusima, nacinu zivota, strukturi i nacinu sirenja.manuchao91 wrote: ↑09/04/2020 18:40 nekako mi se čini da ovo sa Italijom predugo traje
pa jbt od pocetka februara počinje sranje a evo opet danas porast ,ne kontam...
oni da izadju iz izolacije treba jos minimalno 10 dana da broj novozarazenih bude ispod 1000 ...
a ne ovako jedan dan 3800 sutra 4200 pa spane na 3000 pa se digne na 3600 pa onda 3900 nidje veze
USA kriticna
FRA sljedece zariste
Po mom misljenju ove objave svako 24h bi trebale ici na min. 72h jer se tada dobije mnogo jasnija slika. Cak bi bilo idealno dobiti jedan "presjek" u 5 dana.
@Lincoln-Burrows necemo zabraniti, samo zamoliti (k'o Vucic bake i deke
-
MUNAFIK
- Posts: 5261
- Joined: 23/03/2004 00:04
#18808 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Šta je vama jeste'l NORMALNI???
Kakvo 24 satno zatvaranje... Imate li vi mozga, citate li mišljenja strucnih ljudi i najboljih strucnjaka na svijetu...
Zasto 24 satno zatvaranje??? Jer je KINA uradila tako??? Jer Vućić u Srbiji doživljava orgazam od moći i kontrole...
Šta je vama... Pogkedajte koliko ljudi OZDRAVI, a ozdravi ih još dupo tolko koji pojma nemaju ni da su bili zaraženi coronom...
Ovi brojevi zaraženih su PUNOOO PUNO VECI jer ne testiraju se svi valjda to kontate... Dakl procenat urlih je MANJI od ovoga što se racuna!!!
Vec je dokazano da haman 50% zaraženih NEMA NIKAVE SIMTOME ljudi prehodaju zarazu virusom bez ikakvih problema...
Evo vidjet ćemo još kakva je situacija sa UKUPNIM brojem umrlih zadnje 4 godine za januar, februar, i mart.... U Njemačkoj, Austriji, Italiji, Španiji, Francuskoj, Švicarskoj pa to uporedit sa jan, feb i mart 2020 godine pa da vidimo šta je ovo bilo i koliko je ovo sve bilo opasno!!!
Kakvo 24 satno zatvaranje... Imate li vi mozga, citate li mišljenja strucnih ljudi i najboljih strucnjaka na svijetu...
Zasto 24 satno zatvaranje??? Jer je KINA uradila tako??? Jer Vućić u Srbiji doživljava orgazam od moći i kontrole...
Šta je vama... Pogkedajte koliko ljudi OZDRAVI, a ozdravi ih još dupo tolko koji pojma nemaju ni da su bili zaraženi coronom...
Ovi brojevi zaraženih su PUNOOO PUNO VECI jer ne testiraju se svi valjda to kontate... Dakl procenat urlih je MANJI od ovoga što se racuna!!!
Vec je dokazano da haman 50% zaraženih NEMA NIKAVE SIMTOME ljudi prehodaju zarazu virusom bez ikakvih problema...
Evo vidjet ćemo još kakva je situacija sa UKUPNIM brojem umrlih zadnje 4 godine za januar, februar, i mart.... U Njemačkoj, Austriji, Italiji, Španiji, Francuskoj, Švicarskoj pa to uporedit sa jan, feb i mart 2020 godine pa da vidimo šta je ovo bilo i koliko je ovo sve bilo opasno!!!
- Edin H.
- Posts: 52949
- Joined: 08/10/2004 22:36
- Location: Tirana
#18809 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-m ... r-52221688
Coronavirus: Greater Manchester Police warning after 660 parties shut down
Coronavirus: Greater Manchester Police warning after 660 parties shut down
- Lincoln-Burrows
- Posts: 7583
- Joined: 22/01/2008 18:17
- piupiu
- Posts: 16760
- Joined: 05/01/2008 05:08
#18811 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Ljeto ce zaustaviti pandemiju? Zdra'oooo! https://www.tacno.net/nasigradovi/hoce- ... -je-manja/
- olensoner
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: 24/01/2008 19:34
#18812 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Preliminarni rezultati studije COVID-19 klastera Gangelt, Heisenberg, Njemacka
Preliminary results and conclusions of the COVID-19 Case Cluster Study (Gangelt municipality)
Prof. Dr. Hendrik Streeck (Institute for Virology)
Prof. Dr. Gunther Hartmann (Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, Speaker of the Cluster of Excellence ImmunoSensation2)
Prof. Dr. Martin Exner (Institute for Hygiene and Public Health)
Prof. Dr. Matthias Schmid (Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology)
University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 9 April 2020
Background: The municipality of Gangelt is one of the places in Germany most affected by COVID19 . It is assumed that the infection is due to a carnival session on 15 February 2020, as several people tested positive for SARSCoV2 in the aftermath of this session. The carnival session and the outbreak of the session are currently being investigated in more detail. A representative sample was taken from the community
Gangelt (12,529 inhabitants) in the Heinsberg district. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a protocol in which, depending on the expected prevalence, 100 to 300 households are randomly examined. This random sample was coordinated with Prof. Manfred Güllner (Forsa) to ensure its representativeness.
Aim: The aim of the study is to determine the status of SARS-CoV2 infections (percentage of all infected persons) in the community of Gangelt, which have been and are still occurring. In addition, the status of the current SARS-CoV2 immunity shall be determined.
Procedure: A serial letter was sent to about 600 households. In total, about 1000 inhabitants from about 400 households took part in the study. Questionnaires were collected, throat swabs taken and blood tested for the presence of antibodies (IgG, IgA). The interim results and conclusions of approx. 500 persons are included in this first evaluation.
Preliminary result: An existing immunity of approx. 14% (antiSARS-CoV2 IgG positive, specificity of the method >.99 %) was determined. About 2% of the persons had a current SARS-CoV-2 infection detected by PCR method. The infection rate (current infection or already been through) was about 15 % in total. The case fatality rate in relation to the total number of infected persons in the community of Gangelt is approx. 0.37 % with the preliminary data from this study. The lethality rate currently calculated in Germany by Johns-Hopkins University is 1.98 %, which is 5 times higher. The mortality in relation to the total population in Gangelt is currently 0.15 %.
Preliminary conclusion: The lethality calculated by Johns-Hopkins University is 5 times higher than in this study in Gangelt, which is explained by the different reference size of the infected persons. In Gangelt, this study covers all infected persons in the sample, including those with asymptomatic and mild courses. In Gangelt, the proportion of the population that has already developed immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is about 15%. This means that 15% of the population in Gangelt can no longer become infected with SARS-CoV-2, and the process has already begun until herd immunity is achieved. This 15% of the population reduces the speed (net reproduction rate R in epidemiological models) of a further spread of SARS-CoV-2 accordingly.
By adhering to strict hygiene measures, it can be expected that the virus concentration in a person infected can be reduced to such an extent that the severity of the disease is reduced, while at the same time immunity is developed. These favourable conditions are not given in the case of an exceptional outbreak event (superspreading event, e.g. carnival session, après-ski bar Ischgl). With hygiene measures, favourable effects with regard to total mortality can be expected.
We therefore expressly recommend implementing the proposed four-phase strategy of the German Society for Hospital Hygiene (DGKH). This strategy provides for the following model:
Phase 1: Social quarantine with the aim of containing and slowing down the pandemic and avoiding overloading critical supply structures, especially the Health care system
Phase 2: Beginning of the withdrawal of quarantine while ensuring hygienic conditions and behaviour.
Phase 3: Lifting of the quarantine while maintaining the hygienic conditions
Phase 4: State of public life as before the COVID-19 pandemic (status quo ante).
(Statement of the DGKH can be found here:
https://www.krankenhaushygiene.de/ccUpl ... _DGKH_Einl adug_Lageeinschaetzung.pdf)
- Edin H.
- Posts: 52949
- Joined: 08/10/2004 22:36
- Location: Tirana
#18813 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Kako se sada ispaliti za Comoros ili Lesotho?piupiu wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:26 Ljeto ce zaustaviti pandemiju? Zdra'oooo! https://www.tacno.net/nasigradovi/hoce- ... -je-manja/
- Lincoln-Burrows
- Posts: 7583
- Joined: 22/01/2008 18:17
#18814 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Novinarka navodi zemlje Afrike i njihove podatke a oni imaju najmanje testova i testiranih.piupiu wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:26 Ljeto ce zaustaviti pandemiju? Zdra'oooo! https://www.tacno.net/nasigradovi/hoce- ... -je-manja/
-
MUNAFIK
- Posts: 5261
- Joined: 23/03/2004 00:04
#18815 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Nema testova nema ni zaraženih...kao i kod nas... To je ta taktika... Bit cemo zemlja sa NAJMANJE hospitalizoranih zaraženih coronom...Lincoln-Burrows wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:36Novinarka navodi zemlje Afrike i njihove podatke a oni imaju najmanje testova i testiranih.piupiu wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:26 Ljeto ce zaustaviti pandemiju? Zdra'oooo! https://www.tacno.net/nasigradovi/hoce- ... -je-manja/
Ja jos cekam zvanicne podatke broja umrlih za jan, feb, mart zadnje 4 godine od OVIH VELIKIH EU zemalja pa da vidimo kolke su razlike...
-
freelancerBIH
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: 06/08/2018 21:18
#18816 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Kada li ce kod nas ovako nasumicno testirati na anti tijela, ili bar da imamo mogucnost da znamo jesmo li imuniolensoner wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:28 Preliminarni rezultati studije COVID-19 klastera Gangelt, Heisenberg, Njemacka
Preliminary results and conclusions of the COVID-19 Case Cluster Study (Gangelt municipality)
Prof. Dr. Hendrik Streeck (Institute for Virology)
Prof. Dr. Gunther Hartmann (Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, Speaker of the Cluster of Excellence ImmunoSensation2)
Prof. Dr. Martin Exner (Institute for Hygiene and Public Health)
Prof. Dr. Matthias Schmid (Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology)
University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 9 April 2020
Background: The municipality of Gangelt is one of the places in Germany most affected by COVID19 . It is assumed that the infection is due to a carnival session on 15 February 2020, as several people tested positive for SARSCoV2 in the aftermath of this session. The carnival session and the outbreak of the session are currently being investigated in more detail. A representative sample was taken from the community
Gangelt (12,529 inhabitants) in the Heinsberg district. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a protocol in which, depending on the expected prevalence, 100 to 300 households are randomly examined. This random sample was coordinated with Prof. Manfred Güllner (Forsa) to ensure its representativeness.
Aim: The aim of the study is to determine the status of SARS-CoV2 infections (percentage of all infected persons) in the community of Gangelt, which have been and are still occurring. In addition, the status of the current SARS-CoV2 immunity shall be determined.
Procedure: A serial letter was sent to about 600 households. In total, about 1000 inhabitants from about 400 households took part in the study. Questionnaires were collected, throat swabs taken and blood tested for the presence of antibodies (IgG, IgA). The interim results and conclusions of approx. 500 persons are included in this first evaluation.
Preliminary result: An existing immunity of approx. 14% (antiSARS-CoV2 IgG positive, specificity of the method >.99 %) was determined. About 2% of the persons had a current SARS-CoV-2 infection detected by PCR method. The infection rate (current infection or already been through) was about 15 % in total. The case fatality rate in relation to the total number of infected persons in the community of Gangelt is approx. 0.37 % with the preliminary data from this study. The lethality rate currently calculated in Germany by Johns-Hopkins University is 1.98 %, which is 5 times higher. The mortality in relation to the total population in Gangelt is currently 0.15 %.
Preliminary conclusion: The lethality calculated by Johns-Hopkins University is 5 times higher than in this study in Gangelt, which is explained by the different reference size of the infected persons. In Gangelt, this study covers all infected persons in the sample, including those with asymptomatic and mild courses. In Gangelt, the proportion of the population that has already developed immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is about 15%. This means that 15% of the population in Gangelt can no longer become infected with SARS-CoV-2, and the process has already begun until herd immunity is achieved. This 15% of the population reduces the speed (net reproduction rate R in epidemiological models) of a further spread of SARS-CoV-2 accordingly.
By adhering to strict hygiene measures, it can be expected that the virus concentration in a person infected can be reduced to such an extent that the severity of the disease is reduced, while at the same time immunity is developed. These favourable conditions are not given in the case of an exceptional outbreak event (superspreading event, e.g. carnival session, après-ski bar Ischgl). With hygiene measures, favourable effects with regard to total mortality can be expected.
We therefore expressly recommend implementing the proposed four-phase strategy of the German Society for Hospital Hygiene (DGKH). This strategy provides for the following model:
Phase 1: Social quarantine with the aim of containing and slowing down the pandemic and avoiding overloading critical supply structures, especially the Health care system
Phase 2: Beginning of the withdrawal of quarantine while ensuring hygienic conditions and behaviour.
Phase 3: Lifting of the quarantine while maintaining the hygienic conditions
Phase 4: State of public life as before the COVID-19 pandemic (status quo ante).
(Statement of the DGKH can be found here:
https://www.krankenhaushygiene.de/ccUpl ... _DGKH_Einl adug_Lageeinschaetzung.pdf)
Mozda 2120
Ali eto lijepe su vijesti da je CFR 0.37%
Mislim da bi mogao biti jos i manji...
- piupiu
- Posts: 16760
- Joined: 05/01/2008 05:08
#18817 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Navodi i Aziju i Australiju.Lincoln-Burrows wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:36Novinarka navodi zemlje Afrike i njihove podatke a oni imaju najmanje testova i testiranih.piupiu wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:26 Ljeto ce zaustaviti pandemiju? Zdra'oooo! https://www.tacno.net/nasigradovi/hoce- ... -je-manja/
Dramatičan skok zaraženih koronavirusom u jugoistočnoj Aziji početkom marta povećao je sumnju u teoriju da bi toplije vrijeme moglo zaustaviti širenje virusa, kazali su zdravstveni stručnjaci. Zemlje od Indonezije do Tajlanda pa do Malezije i Filipina zabilježile su tada svoju najveću stopu infekcije jer su se i testiranja povećala.
- sadie_forever
- Posts: 6009
- Joined: 24/08/2014 21:34
#18818 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Vala danas mi javljaju na fb da je u Velikoj Kladusi tefereic bio,negdje cujem trznice pijace otvorene..BIH ovo izgleda ne postuje kako spada 
- olensoner
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: 24/01/2008 19:34
#18819 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Nadati se je da ce prolaskom vremena i sticanjem znanja o ponasanju virusa CFR imati trend pada...freelancerBIH wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:40
Kada li ce kod nas ovako nasumicno testirati na anti tijela, ili bar da imamo mogucnost da znamo jesmo li imuni![]()
Mozda 2120![]()
Ali eto lijepe su vijesti da je CFR 0.37%![]()
Mislim da bi mogao biti jos i manji...
- hellhammer
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 06/01/2015 19:24
#18820 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Danas slusam na radiu u austriji 40% manje srcanih i mozdanih udara u zadnjih 6 sedmica
- mO k3
- Posts: 34082
- Joined: 23/09/2009 14:16
- Location: https://youtu.be/xk7QKTXQGbg
#18821 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
hellhammer wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:45 Danas slusam na radiu u austriji 40% manje srcanih i mozdanih udara u zadnjih 6 sedmica
- animals
- Posts: 21520
- Joined: 19/04/2013 22:13
#18822 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Cuj, znaci ljudi se opustili i odmorili..hellhammer wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:45 Danas slusam na radiu u austriji 40% manje srcanih i mozdanih udara u zadnjih 6 sedmica
corona nije ni toliko losa..
koliko su je ocrnili..
- Industrialyzer
- Posts: 4851
- Joined: 11/06/2011 23:51
#18823 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Nije njih manje, eno ih u statistici smrtnih slucajeva od koronehellhammer wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:45 Danas slusam na radiu u austriji 40% manje srcanih i mozdanih udara u zadnjih 6 sedmica
@olensoner hvala na studiji, trenutno mozda najbolji nacin da naucimo nesto o virusu jeste ovaj "zivi laboratorij"
- GAU8
- Posts: 9139
- Joined: 05/01/2011 09:18
#18824 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Ne vjerujem da nešto posebno čekaš te brojeve, jer ti si već unaprijed zauzeo stav prema svemu tome. I kad se napokon pojave brojke, koje ti se neće svidjeti, reći ćeš jednostavno da je sve namješteno...MUNAFIK wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:39Nema testova nema ni zaraženih...kao i kod nas... To je ta taktika... Bit cemo zemlja sa NAJMANJE hospitalizoranih zaraženih coronom...Lincoln-Burrows wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:36Novinarka navodi zemlje Afrike i njihove podatke a oni imaju najmanje testova i testiranih.piupiu wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:26 Ljeto ce zaustaviti pandemiju? Zdra'oooo! https://www.tacno.net/nasigradovi/hoce- ... -je-manja/
Ja jos cekam zvanicne podatke broja umrlih za jan, feb, mart zadnje 4 godine od OVIH VELIKIH EU zemalja pa da vidimo kolke su razlike...
Vozdra.
-
zposao
- Posts: 2898
- Joined: 22/03/2019 09:27
#18825 Re: Novi korona virus - velika opasnost ili ne ? POGLEDATI PRVI POST!
Ne zna čovjek više kome bi vjerovao oko postotka smrtnosti. Spominjalo se dosad o 0,2% pa sve do 12% za isno od države, pokrajine ili mjesta...freelancerBIH wrote: ↑09/04/2020 19:40
Kada li ce kod nas ovako nasumicno testirati na anti tijela, ili bar da imamo mogucnost da znamo jesmo li imuni![]()
Mozda 2120![]()
Ali eto lijepe su vijesti da je CFR 0.37%![]()
Mislim da bi mogao biti jos i manji...
Ali hajde da uzmemo švapsku studiju kao nabolju. Ako jw smrtnost 0,36% od ukupnog broja oboljelih, to znači da u Bosni i Hercegovini , znajući da je dosad zabilježeno 35 smrtnih slučajeva, ima oko 9460 zaraženih . A ne 850 kako trenutno javljaju.
A ako uzmemo smrtnost 0,15% od ovog virusa u odnosu na ukupnu populaciju tog njemačkog grada, mogli bi zaključiti da bi na ukupnu populaciju od 3,5mil stanovnika u bih moglo smrtno stradati 5250 ljudi...
Ali previše je faktora koji utječu na to. Od sastava stanovništva po dobi, zdravlju, rizičnim skupinama, kvaliteti zdravstva itd..
S obzirom da u nas i relativno zdravi ljudi umiru bez da im se ukaže ikakva pomoć, mogli bi sigurno zaključiti da bi kod nas trebala biti veca smrtnost nego u Njemačkoj
Last edited by zposao on 09/04/2020 20:07, edited 1 time in total.
