#15876 Re: Manchester United FC
Posted: 01/09/2015 19:50


PardiolaVelkoski wrote:Samo je jedan pencilin za Grande Mourinha - Alan Pardew.
noiserr wrote:Nebi ovo ni Ferguson mogao preokrenuti tako lako. Kad skontas kolike pare ulazu rivali. Nije se on morao nositi sa ovim Citijem koji svake godine dovodi skupe igrace.TheMule wrote:Kad ce te pisati otvoreno pismo Fergusonu da se vrati?
Sa timovima kao sto je Chelsea i City, tesko bi se opet moglo ponoviti da jedan tim kao United dominira. Jos oni imaju velik brend, i dosta love ali nece ni to dugo ako nastavi ovako, bez znacajnih rezultata. Oni su krenuli putem AC Milana.
Dakle,da se razumijemo nije mi simpatičan niti jedan od ove dvojice,ali porediti Murinjovo destruktivno smeće od igre sa napadačkom igrom kakvu je preferirao Ferguson i to sa kakvim igračima je smiješno,pa Ferguson se sa svim ekipama nadigravao,nikad nije parkirao bus i vrebao kontre ili grešku protivnika,znao je doduše i popušiti foru ali to u svakom slučaju cijenim više od 11 igrača u svom šesnestercu kako izbija loptu i vreba priliku.dinty2 wrote:
Code: Select all
UNITED STATEMENT ON DE GEA TRANSFER
Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The Club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts.
• Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell. • No offer was received for David until yesterday.
• At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford. The deals were dependent on each other.
• In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.
• Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 2042 BST. David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 2232 BST.
• At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk. • Only at 2255 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid.
• At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.
• At 2258 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline.
• It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:
- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)
- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline
• The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The Club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.
Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.Kladio bi se da ce produzit ugovor pa makar i picokom raskino ima sponzorusa i u Engleskoj.Teufik wrote:Code: Select all
UNITED STATEMENT ON DE GEA TRANSFER Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The Club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts. • Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell. • No offer was received for David until yesterday. • At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford. The deals were dependent on each other. • In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United. • Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 2042 BST. David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 2232 BST. • At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk. • Only at 2255 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid. • At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid. • At 2258 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline. • It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because: - Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did) - Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline • The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The Club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route. Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
LVG je psiha ... Ubleha.... Volio bih da ga nogiraju al eto.Tito_i_Partija wrote:I on se posvadj'o sa Van Gaalom.N.N. wrote:Đe` je onaj Marcos Rojo, sta je sa njim ? Povrijedjen ? Od cega majku mu
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Gaal.html
Marcos Rojo's long-term future with Manchester United has been plunged into doubt after he had a serious bust-up with Louis van Gaal.
The Argentine defender, who cost £16million when he arrived at the club 12 months ago from Sporting Lisbon, has not figured in the squad once this season as Van Gaal has preferred to use Daley Blind alongside Chris Smalling.
He enraged Van Gaal earlier this summer and was fined £140,000, which amounts to two weeks' wages, after he failed to join up with United for their pre-season tour of North America because of passport issues.

Pa skrti bsjern je ovaj tok presao 100 mil a nije prodao nista.Point. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Ali to je ok jer Chelsea i City dobiju pare od nekih bogatasa, United ima te pare prirodno otkako su se otvorili kao klub njihove pare su bolje nego bilo cije kako ne kontaaasssssPoint. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Man United je brend koliko god ti to nejasno bilo.todd_smith wrote:Ali to je ok jer Chelsea i City dobiju pare od nekih bogatasa, United ima te pare prirodno otkako su se otvorili kao klub njihove pare su bolje nego bilo cije kako ne kontaaasssssPoint. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Koliko ti patis od Bayerna, to je prosto neshvatljivo. Da diskutujemo na temi Bundeslige, pa hajde i nekako. Al' ovo je fakat nidje veze prozivanje gdje samo pacenicki eksponiras koliko si obolio od uspjeha jednog kluba.missko wrote:Pa skrti bsjern je ovaj tok presao 100 mil a nije prodao nista.Point. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.