Manchester United FC

Fudbal/nogomet, Premijer liga, Liga prvaka, svjetska i evropska prvenstva...

Moderators: Charuga, Tomahawk11

Post Reply
User avatar
dinty2
Posts: 1267
Joined: 08/09/2008 22:11

#15876 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by dinty2 »

Image
User avatar
Velkoski
ModeratorNaBezCenzure
Posts: 79829
Joined: 17/05/2008 15:30
Location: u dergjahu tvog srca
Vozim: Golf 7 GTI

#15877 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Velkoski »

Samo je jedan pencilin za Grande Mourinha - Alan Pardew. :D
User avatar
noiserr
Posts: 3032
Joined: 13/11/2011 01:18
Location: Američki Zavajt

#15878 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by noiserr »

Velkoski wrote:Samo je jedan pencilin za Grande Mourinha - Alan Pardew. :D
Pardiola :D
TheMule
Posts: 4057
Joined: 04/05/2009 03:34

#15879 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by TheMule »

noiserr wrote:
TheMule wrote:Kad ce te pisati otvoreno pismo Fergusonu da se vrati? :lol:
Nebi ovo ni Ferguson mogao preokrenuti tako lako. Kad skontas kolike pare ulazu rivali. Nije se on morao nositi sa ovim Citijem koji svake godine dovodi skupe igrace.

Sa timovima kao sto je Chelsea i City, tesko bi se opet moglo ponoviti da jedan tim kao United dominira. Jos oni imaju velik brend, i dosta love ali nece ni to dugo ako nastavi ovako, bez znacajnih rezultata. Oni su krenuli putem AC Milana.

Nije sve u parama. Ferguson je znao da se ne moze nositi sa Celzijem, i kasnije Citijem, ali je pronalazio druge nacine da ih prestigne. Ova van Gal/Woodward kombinacija misli sve rijesiti tako sto ce baciti pare u smjeru deseta kigraca ko mrezu na ribe, pa ako se neko uhvati,odlicno, nadaju se da ce od njeg nesto biti.

Veliki timovi se grade nekoliko godina polahko, kamen po kamen. City ima ogromne pare, ali i oni su potrosili milijardu eura prije nego su to skontali. Od ovih Manchesterovih igraca, samo Snajderlin i Memfis su tip koji bi Ferguson kupio.
User avatar
Šibicar
Posts: 7117
Joined: 15/10/2007 22:57
Location: Motel Černobil

#15880 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Šibicar »

dinty2 wrote:Image
Dakle,da se razumijemo nije mi simpatičan niti jedan od ove dvojice,ali porediti Murinjovo destruktivno smeće od igre sa napadačkom igrom kakvu je preferirao Ferguson i to sa kakvim igračima je smiješno,pa Ferguson se sa svim ekipama nadigravao,nikad nije parkirao bus i vrebao kontre ili grešku protivnika,znao je doduše i popušiti foru ali to u svakom slučaju cijenim više od 11 igrača u svom šesnestercu kako izbija loptu i vreba priliku.
Teufik
Posts: 4898
Joined: 25/01/2010 18:51
Location: TZ

#15881 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Teufik »

Code: Select all

UNITED STATEMENT ON DE GEA TRANSFER

Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The Club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts. 

• Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell. • No offer was received for David until yesterday.

• At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford.  The deals were dependent on each other.

• In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.

• Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 2042 BST.  David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 2232 BST. 

• At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk.  • Only at 2255 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid. 

• At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.

• At 2258 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline. 

• It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:

- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)

- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline

• The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The Club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.

Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
missko
Posts: 11455
Joined: 22/02/2008 13:22

#15882 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by missko »

Teufik wrote:

Code: Select all

UNITED STATEMENT ON DE GEA TRANSFER

Manchester United notes Real Madrid’s statement on the attempt to sign David De Gea and sell Navas to Manchester United. The Club feels compelled to provide some clarification with the following facts. 

• Manchester United did not seek contact from Real Madrid for the sale of David. David is a key member of our squad and the club’s preference was not to sell. • No offer was received for David until yesterday.

• At lunchtime yesterday, Real Madrid made its first offer to buy David. A deal was agreed between the clubs, which included Navas being transferred to Old Trafford.  The deals were dependent on each other.

• In the last several hours of the process, with Navas at the Real Madrid training ground, Real Madrid were controlling the documentation processes of David, Navas and Real Madrid. Manchester United was in control only of the documentation of Manchester United.

• Manchester United sent transfer documents for both players to Real Madrid at 2042 BST.  David’s documentation was returned by Real Madrid to Manchester United without the signatory page at 2232 BST. 

• At 22:40 BST, minutes before the deadline, major changes to the documentation came through to Manchester United which immediately put the deals at risk.  • Only at 2255 BST were the documents that are needed to cancel David’s contract received by Manchester United from Real Madrid. 

• At this point Navas’ documentation was still not returned by Real Madrid.

• At 2258 BST, the transfer agreement was sent back by Manchester United, uploaded onto TMS and accepted – all before the deadline. 

• It is our understanding that the deals couldn’t happen because:

- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents onto TMS in time (Manchester United did)

- Real Madrid didn’t upload David’s documents to the Spanish league in time, per reports it seems some 28 minutes after the deadline

• The fact that Manchester United filed the papers on time was acknowledged by the Football Association, who offered to support that claim in any discussions with FIFA. The Club offered this assistance, as well as its own timestamped documents to Real Madrid but they have chosen not to go down this route.

Manchester United acts appropriately and efficiently in its transfer dealings. The Club is delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester United player.
Kladio bi se da ce produzit ugovor pa makar i picokom raskino ima sponzorusa i u Engleskoj.
User avatar
skafiskafsnjak
Posts: 32762
Joined: 16/04/2011 18:46

#15883 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by skafiskafsnjak »

Tito_i_Partija wrote:
N.N. wrote:Đe` je onaj Marcos Rojo, sta je sa njim ? Povrijedjen ? Od cega majku mu :D
I on se posvadj'o sa Van Gaalom.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Gaal.html
Marcos Rojo's long-term future with Manchester United has been plunged into doubt after he had a serious bust-up with Louis van Gaal.

The Argentine defender, who cost £16million when he arrived at the club 12 months ago from Sporting Lisbon, has not figured in the squad once this season as Van Gaal has preferred to use Daley Blind alongside Chris Smalling.

He enraged Van Gaal earlier this summer and was fined £140,000, which amounts to two weeks' wages, after he failed to join up with United for their pre-season tour of North America because of passport issues.
LVG je psiha ... Ubleha.... Volio bih da ga nogiraju al eto.
User avatar
Velkoski
ModeratorNaBezCenzure
Posts: 79829
Joined: 17/05/2008 15:30
Location: u dergjahu tvog srca
Vozim: Golf 7 GTI

#15884 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Velkoski »

Sviđa mi se zadnja rečenica, golemi šuk. :D
missko
Posts: 11455
Joined: 22/02/2008 13:22

#15885 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by missko »

"The club are delighted that its fan-favourite double Player of the Year, David de Gea, remains a Manchester Utd player." (Source: @ManUtd)
Evo i prvi intervju buduceg Messija

https://t.co/fb2wLfiGnR
User avatar
bingov buraz
Posts: 11329
Joined: 14/04/2009 20:23

#15886 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by bingov buraz »

Cudi me da je Rooney odobrio ovaj transfer :mrgreen:
User avatar
Logovan
Posts: 103597
Joined: 15/05/2010 00:44
Location: http://i57.klix.com/6ocy11.png

#15888 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Logovan »

:D :D
Image
todd_smith
Posts: 30074
Joined: 23/06/2009 14:14
Location: Ja se ovdje samo zajebajem

#15889 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by todd_smith »

Madrid ovo namjerno ispade uradio da dobije De Geau besplatno

Ovako ispadne da su se trudili, zli United nije pustio namjerno zajebao, ali evo suti ne placi voli tebe tvoj Real evo ti 10m u bonusu kad potpises za nas
User avatar
seoBIH
Posts: 8414
Joined: 22/03/2003 00:00

#15890 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by seoBIH »

Kako da ne, pametna ti logika i svakoga ko vjeruje da je namjerno.

Madrid je sjebao sebe, DDG i Navasa. To ce se odraziti na sve.

DDG ima dva izbora:

1. da presjedi cijelu sezonu na klupi
2. da potpise novi ugovor i igra

Prva opcija je manje vjerovatna, zbog razvoja igraca, ali i cinjenice da je naredne godine euro. Druga opcija je moguća, ali će vjerovatno ugraditi klauzulu od nekih 30tak mil funti za koje igrač može otići.

Pored svega, real se popišao po DDG. Zbog par miliona, oni su sjebali transfer. Mogli su isti završiti ranije u prelaznom roku, ali su cigančili, dok United nije popupštao.
User avatar
Tomahawk11
Globalni moderator
Posts: 109749
Joined: 14/08/2009 14:51

#15891 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Tomahawk11 »

Madrid se popisao po de Gei....a de Gea se davno popisao po Unitedu.
Bezveze je ovo ispalo, jer je jasno da ce de Gea zavrsiti na kraju u Madridu.
No, dobro, to su te igre velikih.
missko
Posts: 11455
Joined: 22/02/2008 13:22

#15892 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by missko »

Ovo je Benitezovo maslo vise nego icije. On ima odavno kompleks od Uniteda i najradije bi da se desi Minhen i da izginu svi. Sva sreca pa Unitedu lova ne igra ulogu nikakvu a debeli konobar ce sam svoja muda jesti opet.
Kako ce sad Navas da razmislja ako De Gea ne potise novi ugovor on ima jos godinu do klupe
missko
Posts: 11455
Joined: 22/02/2008 13:22

#15893 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by missko »

United je i jucer probao da zavrsi Navasa al Real je odbio.
Real nece slati ponudu za De Geu u zimskom prelaznom roku a Del Boske kaze kako ce biti vrlo tesko da nominuje De Geu za EP ako ne bude branio i savjetuje mu da prebrodi situaciju profesionalno i bude ponovo onaj stari.
Sve ide na to da ce De Gea produziti
User avatar
Point.
Posts: 33926
Joined: 28/10/2008 00:24
Location: Bagni di Lucca

#15894 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Point. »

United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
missko
Posts: 11455
Joined: 22/02/2008 13:22

#15895 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by missko »

Point. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Pa skrti bsjern je ovaj tok presao 100 mil a nije prodao nista.
todd_smith
Posts: 30074
Joined: 23/06/2009 14:14
Location: Ja se ovdje samo zajebajem

#15896 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by todd_smith »

Point. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Ali to je ok jer Chelsea i City dobiju pare od nekih bogatasa, United ima te pare prirodno otkako su se otvorili kao klub njihove pare su bolje nego bilo cije kako ne kontaaasssss
missko
Posts: 11455
Joined: 22/02/2008 13:22

#15897 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by missko »

todd_smith wrote:
Point. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Ali to je ok jer Chelsea i City dobiju pare od nekih bogatasa, United ima te pare prirodno otkako su se otvorili kao klub njihove pare su bolje nego bilo cije kako ne kontaaasssss
Man United je brend koliko god ti to nejasno bilo.
todd_smith
Posts: 30074
Joined: 23/06/2009 14:14
Location: Ja se ovdje samo zajebajem

#15898 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by todd_smith »

Naravno, a real, barca, bayern to je hava
User avatar
Tito_i_Partija
Posts: 12550
Joined: 11/03/2014 15:56
Location: Kod Sebije na pregledu

#15899 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by Tito_i_Partija »

missko wrote:
Point. wrote:United potrosio 400 miliona € kako je LVG dosao. I onda seru po Citiju i Chelsea-u. Za ovakvo rasipanje para se ide u zatvor.
Pa skrti bsjern je ovaj tok presao 100 mil a nije prodao nista.
Koliko ti patis od Bayerna, to je prosto neshvatljivo. Da diskutujemo na temi Bundeslige, pa hajde i nekako. Al' ovo je fakat nidje veze prozivanje gdje samo pacenicki eksponiras koliko si obolio od uspjeha jednog kluba.

Komedija. :lol:
User avatar
skafiskafsnjak
Posts: 32762
Joined: 16/04/2011 18:46

#15900 Re: Manchester United FC

Post by skafiskafsnjak »

Bayern Munchen, najuspjesniji klub iz Bavarske hahaha
Post Reply