Forum Klix.ba

drastic wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-appro ... 51092.html

jeza u ledja wrote:sta kazu trump u periodu od 10 godina (85-95) uspio izgubiti milijardu dolara. ny times mu valjda nasao stare tax returns. procitah da je po toj racunici mozda covjek koji je izgubio najvise love u americi u tom periodu. valja i to znat

90minut wrote: To su za njega smiješne pare da bilo šta znaš shvatio bi

jeza u ledja wrote:

90minut wrote: To su za njega smiješne pare da bilo šta znaš shvatio bi

Naravno da to nisu smijesne pare ni za koga, pogotovo ne u 80-im. Dijete drago, ne lupetaj o stvarima o kojima nemas nikakvu predstavu.

90minut wrote: Da grijesim nisu smijesne pare, kao da ja i ti recimo izgubimo 10 hiljada prezivicemo zar ne?

Likovi poput njega imaju po par milijardi samo investirano u raznoraznim poslovima.

славянин wrote:

stakasa wrote:Upali sad twitter i prva vijest - Trump se probudio . Znaci budala odma iz kreveta pocne twittat i hajncat na Kinu a ovi vam na berzama se za glavu hvataju

Nije tako jednostavno bojim se Kina je potegnula "nazad" u dogovoru pa je trump zaprijetio tarifama - sve to u sustini finalno malo natezanja sta se moze jos cvaknuti prije finalizacije dogovora

B6Redhell wrote:

славянин wrote:

stakasa wrote:Upali sad twitter i prva vijest - Trump se probudio . Znaci budala odma iz kreveta pocne twittat i hajncat na Kinu a ovi vam na berzama se za glavu hvataju

Nije tako jednostavno bojim se Kina je potegnula "nazad" u dogovoru pa je trump zaprijetio tarifama - sve to u sustini finalno malo natezanja sta se moze jos cvaknuti prije finalizacije dogovora

Ma kakvi ovom zadnjom prijetnjom nije blefiro. Vidim od veceras carina iz kine sa 10% na 25% skocila. Velika je to cifra. To ce opet preko kupaca da se prelomi, al nek ima neko kini stop znak postaviti. Manipuliraju svime...

mO k3 wrote:

B6Redhell wrote:
Ma kakvi ovom zadnjom prijetnjom nije blefiro. Vidim od veceras carina iz kine sa 10% na 25% skocila. Velika je to cifra. To ce opet preko kupaca da se prelomi, al nek ima neko kini stop znak postaviti. Manipuliraju svime...

roba koja je na putu prema USA nece se jos cariniti po tim taksama , nego roba koja "slijedi"

I ovo je sada "blef" jer imaju jos vremena.... da li ce se dogovoriti ?? Hoce moraju jer i Kinezi imaju oruzje gdje mogu da pritisnu USA

mO k3 wrote:Koliko sam skontao jutros da Kinezi imaju milijarde i milijarde us obaveznica , još uz to sline zalihe us dolara .... ako bude bacili na Markt ode sve u tri fine

Zvek wrote:Nakon što je Amerika podigla carinu na robu iz Kine, Kina je upravo uzvratila istom mjerom.
Da li je pametno Amerikancima da vuku ovakve poteze? A otvorena su žarišta u Venecueli i Iranu.
Šta se sprema tokom 2019. godine?

jeza u ledja wrote:To ti se zive the art of the deal ‘arane.

Huawei ostaje bez podrške za operativni sistem Android

mO k3 wrote:https://www.facebook.com/hcstracheldrah ... 400572948/

What is China doing in terms of cheating on trade and intellectual property as the Trump administration says, and how can the United States stop this behavior?

Hanson: China does not honor patents and copyright laws. It still exports knock-off and counterfeit products. It steals research and development investment through a vast array of espionage rings. It manipulates its currency.

Its government companies export goods at below the cost of production to grab market share. It requires foreign companies to hand over technology as a price of doing business in China. And, most importantly, it assumes, even demands, that Western nations do not emulate its own international roguery—or else.

The result is a strange paradox in which the United States and Europe assume that China is an international commercial outlaw, but the remedy is deemed worse than the disease. So, many Western firms make enormous profits in China through joint projects, and so many academic institutions depend on China students, and so many financial institutions are invested in China, that to question its mercantilism is to be derided as a quaint nationalist, or a dangerous protectionist, or a veritable racist. China is an astute student of the Western science of victimology and always poses as a target of Western vindictiveness, racism, or puerile jealousy.

Remedies? First, we must give up the 40-year fantasies that the richer China gets, the more Western and liberal it will become; or that the more China becomes familiar with the West, the greater its admiration and respect for Western values; or that China has so many internal problems that it cannot possibly pose a threat to the West; or that Western magnanimity in foreign policy and trade relations will be appreciated and returned in kind. Instead, the better paradigm is imperial Japan between 1930 and 1941, when Tokyo absorbed Asian allies; had sent a quarter-million students and attachés to the West to learn or steal technology and doctrine; rapidly Westernized; declared Western colonial powers and the US as tired and spent, and without any legitimate business in the Pacific; and considered its own authoritarianism a far better partner to free market capitalism than the supposedly messy and clumsy democracies of the West.