Forum Klix.ba

jeza u ledja wrote: ↑24/10/2024 00:53 Da bar postoji ta “deep state” da mu naprave kakav skandal sve sa videom i maloljetnim vanzemaljcima, izbace neki October surprise da valja…
Najbolji dokaz da deep state ne postoji je njegova pobjeda 2016.

A sad ako pobijedi, samo ce dokazati da jedino moze dobiti zene. Kamala, Hillary, Nikki, Ted…

Crvena Tifoza wrote: ↑24/10/2024 01:20

jeza u ledja wrote: ↑24/10/2024 00:53 Da bar postoji ta “deep state” da mu naprave kakav skandal sve sa videom i maloljetnim vanzemaljcima, izbace neki October surprise da valja…
Najbolji dokaz da deep state ne postoji je njegova pobjeda 2016.

A sad ako pobijedi, samo ce dokazati da jedino moze dobiti zene. Kamala, Hillary, Nikki, Ted…

October surprise će se desiti. Samo je pitanje kojem kandidatu.

Osmi Socrates wrote: ↑24/10/2024 01:59 Šta je bilo oktobarsko iznenađenje 2020?

konoplja wrote: ↑24/10/2024 02:04

Osmi Socrates wrote: ↑24/10/2024 01:59 Šta je bilo oktobarsko iznenađenje 2020?

HB laptop. Successfully suppressed.

Osmi Socrates wrote: ↑24/10/2024 02:11 To je bio pokušaj manufakturiranja oktobarskog iznenađenja od strane najglupljeg čovjeka u Trumpovom timu.

Dvije komisije u Senatu, obje pod republikanskim vodstvom, su zaključile da Biden nije uradio ništa pogrešno.

Ne kažem da nije moglo upaliti.

konoplja wrote: ↑24/10/2024 02:17

Osmi Socrates wrote: ↑24/10/2024 02:11 To je bio pokušaj manufakturiranja oktobarskog iznenađenja od strane najglupljeg čovjeka u Trumpovom timu.

Dvije komisije u Senatu, obje pod republikanskim vodstvom, su zaključile da Biden nije uradio ništa pogrešno.

Ne kažem da nije moglo upaliti.

Nije bitno je li uradio sta pogresno ili ne. Poenta oktobarskog iznenađenja je da ima potencijal da utjece na rezultat izbora.

Nisamsdaali wrote: ↑24/10/2024 01:52 https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/18 ... 0971337864

Ovo je izgleda u pitanju

Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.
But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.
And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)
Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.

ultima_palabra wrote: ↑24/10/2024 04:11

Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.
But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.
And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)
Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.

Mislim da sam 2020. ovdje pisao da glasanje za Trumpa podrazumijeva jedan nivo sociopatije i nihilizma. Evo ovaj autor iz Atlantica je to bolje artikulisao. Zapravo i onaj clanak JD Vancea iz 2016. o kulturoloskom heroinu je jedan od boljih objasnjenja.