Forum Klix.ba

Truba wrote: ↑03/10/2023 20:48 ima jeftine radioaktivne tunjevine u merkatoru FAO 71

zona ribolova gdje je radioaktivna voda

moimoi wrote: ↑04/10/2023 10:34 If you look at a can of tuna or a packaging of salmon you will notice the information which will tell you where the fish was caught. This is very important information, because now you will be able to know if the fish was caught in the area of radiation. Remember, fish that were caught in the areas: FAO 61, 67, 71, 77 and 87 are from radioactive areas and are labelled with red colour!

VladaFBiH wrote: ↑04/10/2023 10:42

moimoi wrote: ↑04/10/2023 10:34 If you look at a can of tuna or a packaging of salmon you will notice the information which will tell you where the fish was caught. This is very important information, because now you will be able to know if the fish was caught in the area of radiation. Remember, fish that were caught in the areas: FAO 61, 67, 71, 77 and 87 are from radioactive areas and are labelled with red colour!

a kao tuna ne pliva i ne ide iz područja u područje za 600 dana pređu cca 40.000km odnosno preplivaju pacifik 3x za to vrijeme

dječak sa šibicama wrote: ↑03/10/2023 21:23 https://www.klix.ba/biznis/privreda/has ... /231003129

naravno da je u okolnim drzavama jeftinije, samo procitati ovo

pljackaska mafija

NediM17 wrote: ↑04/10/2023 11:28 'naci samo jadranska sardina.

Hajvan wrote: ↑04/10/2023 11:34 Nisam to znao.
Otkaad imamo ribarske brodove u Jadranu?
I gdje je fabrika za preradu tune u Bosni?

moimoi wrote: ↑04/10/2023 11:40

Baj d vej… u Stocu imas fabriku za preradu ribe.
Doduse to je Hercegovina

ljubijankic wrote: ↑04/10/2023 11:26

dječak sa šibicama wrote: ↑03/10/2023 21:23 https://www.klix.ba/biznis/privreda/has ... /231003129

naravno da je u okolnim drzavama jeftinije, samo procitati ovo

pljackaska mafija

Sreća pa imamo ratne profitere, Bosnjake, pa oni drze marzu na samo 70% Spas Bosnjaka je iskljucivo u rukama ratnih profitera sto bi rekao jadan forumas

banjaluka078 wrote: ↑04/10/2023 12:40

moimoi wrote: ↑04/10/2023 11:40

Baj d vej… u Stocu imas fabriku za preradu ribe.
Doduse to je Hercegovina

Još ih nisu zatvorili?

https://www.hercegovina.info/vijesti/bi ... ja/207853/

So the question is, how much more radiation did these particular tuna fish contain? The answer is: A trivial amount. In fact, radiation from the cesium is 30 times less than the radiation that's already in the fish naturally in the form of potassium-40, according to the research paper.

If you are still worried about the cesium from Fukushima, Robert Emery at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston says you'd need to eat 2.5 to 4 tons of tuna in a year to get a dose of cesium-137 that exceeds health limits.

Results:
The analysis showed that none of the samples exceeded the threshold levels for the three heavy metals, which was specified by the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) and European Commission Regulation (CR) No. 1881/2006. The EDI and provisional tolerable weekly index (PTWI) obtained in this study were still in the safe range. However, the PTWI values for Pb in yellowfin tuna product from the Indian Ocean were higher (0.0038 mg/kg) compared to the recommended standard for the adult population. The THQ-TTHQ values of fish caught from these oceans were also within the acceptable range specified by the two agencies, indicating that they are safe for consumption by people with various age groups and for export purposes.

Conclusion:
The average levels of three heavy metals (Cd, Pb, and Hg) in muscle samples of yellowfin tuna and swordfish caught from the Pacific and Hindian Oceans were within the acceptable range as specified by the SNI and CR No. 1881/2006. Furthermore, the EDI and THQs values indicated that fishes caught from the Pacific and Hindian Oceans were safe for consumption. This research is still limited to assessing two capture fisheries commodities. Further research is needed on the assessment of heavy metal levels in other capture fisheries commodities in this capture zone.