Nisam mislio na GNSS, koji su BTW pogresno nazvali "Transceiverom" (TX/RX), umjesto samo Receiver, niti je ovo GNSS.
Advisor to the Head of the President's Office Mykhailo Podolyak assures that Ukraine will find a solution for the Starlink satellite communications services to continue working in Ukraine.
"Let's be honest. Whether someone likes it or not, Elon Musk helped us survive at the most critical moments of the war. Businesses are entitled to their own strategies. Ukraine will find a solution for Starlink to continue its work. We expect that by the end of the negotiations the company will provide a stable connection."
Tako se diplomatija obavlja. Nema uz nos. Sa svoma fino od koga imas koristi.Čitalac wrote: ↑14/10/2022 18:28 Podoljak kaže da će Ukrajina pronaći način za nastavak funkcionisanja Starlinka i odaje priznanje Musku.
Advisor to the Head of the President's Office Mykhailo Podolyak assures that Ukraine will find a solution for the Starlink satellite communications services to continue working in Ukraine.
"Let's be honest. Whether someone likes it or not, Elon Musk helped us survive at the most critical moments of the war. Businesses are entitled to their own strategies. Ukraine will find a solution for Starlink to continue its work. We expect that by the end of the negotiations the company will provide a stable connection."
Čitalac wrote: ↑14/10/2022 18:28 Podoljak kaže da će Ukrajina pronaći način za nastavak funkcionisanja Starlinka i odaje priznanje Musku.
Advisor to the Head of the President's Office Mykhailo Podolyak assures that Ukraine will find a solution for the Starlink satellite communications services to continue working in Ukraine.
"Let's be honest. Whether someone likes it or not, Elon Musk helped us survive at the most critical moments of the war. Businesses are entitled to their own strategies. Ukraine will find a solution for Starlink to continue its work. We expect that by the end of the negotiations the company will provide a stable connection."
Ne i Wargonzu, neeeeeeee!!!
Gledaj preciznosti bokte mazo, u po srede, ko 50ka u pikadu
ozbiljniji je izvorPast more Bahmut ali rus nikad odahnut.
VIdi, nekoliko stvari se mora razumjeti kada pricamo o Starlinku i Ukrajini:splinter wrote: ↑14/10/2022 11:12Evo ovdje objašnjeno skoro sve i sa lica mjesta:JoseMujica wrote: ↑14/10/2022 10:35
ispravka krivog navoda...nije on ništa poklonio već je to Uncle Sam kupio i dao na korištenje UAFSpoilerShow
o pa ovo moze uz saz komotnoBernardinac wrote: ↑14/10/2022 19:30Past more Bahmut ali rus nikad odahnut.
Sprema se sudbina i za zlog Putina.
Putlerići sivi tići svi ste novi hitlerići.
gledaj Fazlije ko na OI u Sidneju
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/14/us/s ... apons.htmlSince the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has lost six thousand pieces of equipment and is using ammunition on a scale that it will not be able to compensate due to Western sanctions. According to The New York Times, this is stated in a report by the US government.
It is alleged that Russia's ability to create complex high-precision weapons has already suffered from export control measures that limit Russia's access to advanced technologies. Western sanctions have also led to a shortage of less complex technologies in Russia, such as bearings, which complicates the production and repair of tanks, aircraft, submarines, and other military systems.
The United States also recorded that since May, Russia has lacked critical supplies of diesel engines, engine parts for helicopters and aircraft, and armored tanks. Besides, Moscow had problems with the implementation of defense orders from foreign states. To circumvent the sanctions, Russian intelligence agencies were ordered to "illegally buy Western technologies and parts," the report said. Russia is also seeking supplies from countries such as Iran and North Korea, which are also under Western sanctions.
According to a senior US official who spoke on anonymity, Washington is looking for other "bottlenecks" in the technological process that would complicate the production of military equipment for Russia – such as ball bearings and fasteners.
apsidejzi wrote: ↑14/10/2022 19:38VIdi, nekoliko stvari se mora razumjeti kada pricamo o Starlinku i Ukrajini:
1) Starlink je PRIVATNA kompanija koja je uzela aktivno ucesce u ratu. Privatne kompanije obicno ne uzimaju nikakvo ucesce u ratovima. GLedaju da budu neutralne. Vecina ostalih kompanija je jednostavno napustila rusiju ali niko nije rekao da se nikada nece vratiti tamo. Napustili su zbog sankcija koje su njihove vlade uvele. Sutra da se sve smiri, eto Adidasa nazad u RUsiju. Eto mekdonaldsa nazad u rusiju. RUsija je veliko i atraktivno trziste. Space X ce dobiti karinu u Rusiji. Dakle, samim omogucavanjem strarlinka u Ukrajini, Elon je sebi pucao u nogu kada gledamo biznis aspekat citave price. MOgao je jednostavno reci da ne moze okrenuti satelite zbog nekog klinca i to bi bilo to. Usutit se kao ostali kapitalisti. Ali nije. Uzeo je aktivnu stranu.
2) Komunikacija je kljuc ratnog uspjeha. Da rusi mogu presretnuti pozive ukrajinskih generala, bili bi mnogo efikasniji. Vecina poginulih ruskih komandanata svih cinova su poginuli zbog otkrivenog polozaja na osnovu slabe komunikacije.
3) Kako rece ovaj u tweetu, stralink u Ukrajini kosta 60 dolara dok u EU kosta 120 dolara. Negdje 105. Helem, sa poslovnog aspekta, svaki mjesec za svaku musteriju, Elon gubi 40-60 dolara potencijalne dobiti. U dobu inflacije kad jebeni Bingo gleda da kradom poveca cijenu jer vidi priliku, kad Hifa beskrupulozno povecava cijenu goriva cim poskupi na svjetskoj berzi a ne smanjuje kad padne... Starlink nudi svoje visokosofisticirane usluge za pola cijene. Da je slijedio poslovnu logiku, Starlink je trebao kostati 200dolara u Ukrajini. Pare se zaradjuju kad nekome nesto treba. Umjesto da zaradjuje 100 dolara ekstra on ima smanjenu dobit za 40 dolara.
4) Ovdje ljudi ocekuju da on BESPLATNO daje Starlink usluge. Kao da je to kutija cigareta pa pocastis jarane. U pitanju je visoko sofisticirana tehnologija koja kosta boga pitaj koliko. Da sve to napravis, posaljes u svemir i odrzavas. A nisi ni dolara jos zaradio. Kad satelit ode u svemir ti si u minusu oko 100 miliona dolara. Tek tad pocinje otplata i satelit mora biti par godina aktivan da bi dosao na nulu. Elon je 20.000 takvih satelita usmjerio u Ukrajinu. Umjesto da zaradjuje pare u Americi 120 dolara po korisniku, on u Ukrajini dobija 60 dolara po korisniku. U medjuvremenu i dalje placa radnike koji se brinu za satelite, placa inzinjere koji prave nove satelite, programere koji doradjuju AI za kontrolu tih satelita. Tu ima bezbroj troskova, plus izgubljena zarada.
5) Ne postoji kompanija na svijetu koja je uradila ovo sta starlink radi. Jel iko cuo da je Adidas poslao 20.000 pari patika za ukrajinske vojnike po duplo jeftinijoj cijeni? Jel iko cuo da je Ford poslao 20.000 automobila po duplo jeftinijoj cijeni? Jel iko cuo da je IKEA napravila 50% stizenje na svu robu u Ukrajini kako bi izbjeglice iz Hersona mogle kupiti novi namjestaj? Niko to nije cuo jer ovo su privatne kompanije koje gledaju svoj interes. Ali njih niko ne zove supcima jer se drze ispod radara.SpoilerShow6) Za moje shvatanje, Elon je heroj Ukrajine. Sacuvao je mnogo ukrajinskih zivota a nije morao. Mogao je bas kao i svi ostali drzati nizak profil, ne eksponirati se, kazati kako sateliti nisu spremni za Ukrajinu, neki ugao ne valja, da je hakiran od ruskih hakera i sl. Mogao je kao Adidas, Mercedes, IKEA, FOrd ili bilo koja druga kompanija... jednostavno nastaviti sa svojim biznisom. U najbolju ruku, mogao je otvoriti starlink ali za paprenu cijenu. Uraditi isto ono sto Bingo radi, sto Hifa radi, sto OPEC radi, sto transportne firme rade. Ali nije. I za mene on nije supak. Ima pravo na svoje misljenje, pogotovo u dobu kada se prijeti nuklearnim oruzjem. Evo ja bih prvi vise volio da Ukrajina izgubi Krim i ove 4 oblasti a da ne dodje do nukelarnog rata.
Isto kao i treći rajh . Izgubili su zato što nisu mogli nadoknaditi gubitke u tehnici.Čitalac wrote: ↑14/10/2022 20:03 Moskva naprosto ne može da nadoknadi ogromne gubitke u tehnici, kažu u Washingtonu.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/14/us/s ... apons.htmlSince the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia has lost six thousand pieces of equipment and is using ammunition on a scale that it will not be able to compensate due to Western sanctions. According to The New York Times, this is stated in a report by the US government.
It is alleged that Russia's ability to create complex high-precision weapons has already suffered from export control measures that limit Russia's access to advanced technologies. Western sanctions have also led to a shortage of less complex technologies in Russia, such as bearings, which complicates the production and repair of tanks, aircraft, submarines, and other military systems.
The United States also recorded that since May, Russia has lacked critical supplies of diesel engines, engine parts for helicopters and aircraft, and armored tanks. Besides, Moscow had problems with the implementation of defense orders from foreign states. To circumvent the sanctions, Russian intelligence agencies were ordered to "illegally buy Western technologies and parts," the report said. Russia is also seeking supplies from countries such as Iran and North Korea, which are also under Western sanctions.
According to a senior US official who spoke on anonymity, Washington is looking for other "bottlenecks" in the technological process that would complicate the production of military equipment for Russia – such as ball bearings and fasteners.
