Forum Klix.ba

DEMONIKA wrote: ↑18/06/2020 00:14 svaki put kada osobu koja grca u parama, a ne daje ni cent za gladne, a uz to zgrće pare za sve što uradi, nazovete filantropom
smješniji ste, naivniji i gluplji od svih teoretičara zavjera

charitable causes during the coronavirus pandemic

Bill Gates’s Charity Paradox

CPT wrote: ↑18/06/2020 00:26 da ti bar priblizno znas gdje i kako Bill zgrce pare..... evo malo pomoci...
https://www.theinvestorspodcast.com/leg ... portfolio/

Pitar sa Kariba wrote: ↑17/06/2020 23:23

laik1981 wrote: ↑17/06/2020 21:19

Kaze kako frajer (glavni negativac u prici) moze da predaje na Princetonu i Harvardu? Nikako mu nije jasno, evo kaze on "svira svadbe i snima ova videa" i jedva stize.
Jbt 25k pregleda za tri sata!?

The strength and duration of immunity after infection are key issues for ‘shield immunity’18 and for informing decisions on how and when to ease physical distancing restrictions19,20. Previous studies have shown that circulating antibodies against SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV last for at least 1 year21,22. Sustained IgG levels were maintained for more than 2 years after SARS-CoV infection23,24. Antibody responses in individuals with laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV infection lasted for at least 34 months after the outbreak25. Recently, several studies characterizing adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection have reported that most COVID-19 convalescent individuals have detectable neutralizing antibodies, which correlate with the numbers of virus-specific T cells26,27,28,29. In this study, we observed that IgG levels and neutralizing antibodies in a high proportion of individuals who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection start to decrease within 2–3 months after infection. In another analysis of the dynamics of neutralizing antibody titers in eight convalescent patients with COVID-19, four patients showed decreased neutralizing antibodies approximately 6–7 weeks after illness onset30. One mathematical model also suggests a short duration of immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection31.

Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure

RESULTS
We detected cross-replicating associations with rs11385942 at locus 3p21.31 and
with rs657152 at locus 9q34.2, which were significant at the genomewide level
(P<5×10−8) in the meta-analysis of the two case–control panels (odds ratio, 1.77;
95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.11; P=1.15×10−10; and odds ratio, 1.32; 95%
CI, 1.20 to 1.47; P=4.95×10−8, respectively). At locus 3p21.31, the association signal
spanned the genes SLC6A20, LZTFL1, CCR9, FYCO1, CXCR6 and XCR1. The association
signal at locus 9q34.2 coincided with the ABO blood group locus; in this cohort, a
blood-group–specific analysis showed a higher risk in blood group A than in other
blood groups (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.75; P=1.48×10−4) and a protective
effect in blood group O as compared with other blood groups (odds ratio, 0.65;
95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79; P=1.06×10−5).

daddy-kool wrote: ↑21/06/2020 21:11 https://covid19.tabipacademy.com/wp-con ... Severe.pdf

Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure

RESULTS
We detected cross-replicating associations with rs11385942 at locus 3p21.31 and
with rs657152 at locus 9q34.2, which were significant at the genomewide level
(P<5×10−8) in the meta-analysis of the two case–control panels (odds ratio, 1.77;
95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.11; P=1.15×10−10; and odds ratio, 1.32; 95%
CI, 1.20 to 1.47; P=4.95×10−8, respectively). At locus 3p21.31, the association signal
spanned the genes SLC6A20, LZTFL1, CCR9, FYCO1, CXCR6 and XCR1. The association
signal at locus 9q34.2 coincided with the ABO blood group locus; in this cohort, a
blood-group–specific analysis showed a higher risk in blood group A than in other
blood groups (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.75; P=1.48×10−4) and a protective
effect in blood group O as compared with other blood groups (odds ratio, 0.65;
95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79; P=1.06×10−5).

Ako je neko radio sekvenciranje sa 23andme, SNP rs657152 bude u rezultatima.

TESLA_EDISON wrote: ↑22/06/2020 12:26 Jel još krive 5G i Gatesa za Koronu ili ima sad nešto novo?

zemomak wrote: ↑21/06/2020 21:32

daddy-kool wrote: ↑21/06/2020 21:11 https://covid19.tabipacademy.com/wp-con ... Severe.pdf

Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure

RESULTS
We detected cross-replicating associations with rs11385942 at locus 3p21.31 and
with rs657152 at locus 9q34.2, which were significant at the genomewide level
(P<5×10−8) in the meta-analysis of the two case–control panels (odds ratio, 1.77;
95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.11; P=1.15×10−10; and odds ratio, 1.32; 95%
CI, 1.20 to 1.47; P=4.95×10−8, respectively). At locus 3p21.31, the association signal
spanned the genes SLC6A20, LZTFL1, CCR9, FYCO1, CXCR6 and XCR1. The association
signal at locus 9q34.2 coincided with the ABO blood group locus; in this cohort, a
blood-group–specific analysis showed a higher risk in blood group A than in other
blood groups (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.75; P=1.48×10−4) and a protective
effect in blood group O as compared with other blood groups (odds ratio, 0.65;
95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79; P=1.06×10−5).

Ako je neko radio sekvenciranje sa 23andme, SNP rs657152 bude u rezultatima.

jbg, nisu svi mikrobiolozi i gneticari, sta to znaci

Russki wrote: ↑24/06/2020 23:41 Jedna od jacih gluposti sta sam vidio ovdje i inace jeste ta da brnjicari i ostali pobornici korone koji ne znaju gdje im glava, a gdje guzica optuze svakog ko propitkuje sve zivo sto im se servira, tako i pojedine placenike od doktora, ali zato bez pogovora slusaju sta o medicini ima reci informaticar Bill Gates.

Divota.

Zivimo zaista u jako interesantnim vremenima.

TESLA_EDISON wrote: ↑25/06/2020 07:36 Bill Gates je današnja majka Tereza!

Hendrix wrote: ↑25/06/2020 07:31

Russki wrote: ↑24/06/2020 23:41 Jedna od jacih gluposti sta sam vidio ovdje i inace jeste ta da brnjicari i ostali pobornici korone koji ne znaju gdje im glava, a gdje guzica optuze svakog ko propitkuje sve zivo sto im se servira, tako i pojedine placenike od doktora, ali zato bez pogovora slusaju sta o medicini ima reci informaticar Bill Gates.

Divota.

Zivimo zaista u jako interesantnim vremenima.

Za razliku od vecine ljudi koji komentarisu, Bill Gates nije pokupio znanje sa Facebook komentara i prica...nego od tima ljudi s kojima saradjuje godinama. Porediti covjeka koji cita par knjiga sedmicno decenijama i saradjuje sa vrhunskim umovima danasnjice sa generalnom populacijom je presmijesno stvarno. Kontam da treba neki zli negativac u citavoj ovoj prici, sto je ovde Gates jel, ali kad vidim komentare nasih ljudi o njemu ne mogu a da se ne nasmijem kad skontam da ih dosta pise sa Microsoft operativnih sistema.