karanana,uzimalal sam avionsko pravo prije 4 godine,sve sam zaboravila,he he he ,ali bit ce komplikacija,so bozirom na "velicinu" slucaja na internacionalnom nivou,iako avio kompanija placa ,a koja je uvijek pod osiguranjem ; ovdje je problem sa dokazima,no i ako dokazi ne postoje u avio zakonu naravno postoji sekcija za nestale letece objekte,pa tako i avionekaranana wrote:cuj to?
ne trazi osiguranje dokaz o padu i katastrofi? cudi me.
mozda us u sjevernoj koreji cekaju da pare legnu.
evo link firme koja prati slucaj
http://www.bfnlaw.com/resources/legal-i ... mh370.html
znaci,avio komapnija placa,to sam vec pisala ne jednoj od stanica doticne temeUnder the 1999 Montreal Convention, Malaysia Airlines will be held liable for damages suffered by the passengers’ families without proof of fault, up to 113,100 SDRs. SDRs are monetary references used by the International Monetary Fund and others; as of the time of the accident, 113,100 SDRs were worth approximately US $175,504.
Under Article 21(2) of the 1999 Montreal Convention, the airline is liable for all of the plaintiff’s damages unless the airline proves that it was completely without fault, or that the accident was caused solely by the fault of a third party. Unlike most laws that place the burden on the plaintiff to prove his or her claim, the Convention imposes on the airline the duty to prove its lack of fault. In this case, it remains to be seen whether the investigation will identify evidence that will allow Malaysia Airlines to mount a defense under Article 21(2).
...u životu sam platio 2. kazne za prekoračenje brzine, to mi je sav krim. dosije 
...ali to ne znači da ne znam braniti svoja prava, dignitet, itd, itd...ovo je zaista haos šta zvaničnici rade... 
palis znaci po klixu
malo je reci da je u p. materinoj od mjesta gdje je nestao sa radara. skoro pa na drugom kraju svijeta. 
