Forum Klix.ba

plavi_E wrote: ↑13/09/2022 17:24 Prema našim informacijama, protiv stanovnika Harkovske oblasti sprovode se mnoge kaznene mere, ljude muče, maltretiraju", rekao je portparol Kremlja Dmitrij Peskov.

Nije valjda da taj Harkiv nema ZOO sa bar jednim coporom gladnih lavova.

Comanche wrote: ↑13/09/2022 16:05

Milenkov buraz wrote: ↑13/09/2022 15:22

Istina, volio neko USA ili ne oni su ne nadjebivi. Treba samo vratiti film i analizirati kako su Ruse obavještajno poklopili, šta poklopili, devastirali Ruse. Sve su znali, kada Putler ide u WC i kada prdi, kad aje izdao naredbu, kada su krenuli. Toliko je nestvarno i nadrealno izgledalo da i neki saveznici nisu vjerovali Amerikancima ali kada su krenule prve rakete iz Rusije prema Ukrajini onda je svima bilo jasno.

Isti ti Ameri su bili uhvaceni sa spustenim gacama jer su totalno profulali predvidjeti kako brzo ce Talibani osvojiti Avganistan.

Ista ta CIA je rekla da ce Kijev pasti za 72-96 sati. Imaju oni dobru obavjestajnu sluzbu ali analiza im bas i nije najjaca strana.

Čitalac wrote: ↑13/09/2022 16:40 Podoljak opet apeluje na Berlin da pošalje Ukrajini tenkove jer onaj „cirkularni sistem“ očito ne funkcioniše.

"You need to call a spade a spade: the circular supply system doesn't work. For six months, the Allies have been arguing over who will sell tanks to Ukraine. There are no tanks for six months, because there is no "political solution". Russia continues terror, people are dying, time is lost. Germany, we are waiting for your word."

plavi_E wrote: ↑13/09/2022 17:29 Pa nosil u tom Harkivu zenskac stikle. Pa nije valjda da nijednog valjanog para stikli u tom Harkivu nema.

karanana wrote: ↑13/09/2022 17:50

plavi_E wrote: ↑13/09/2022 17:29 Pa nosil u tom Harkivu zenskac stikle. Pa nije valjda da nijednog valjanog para stikli u tom Harkivu nema.

nista, moracemo hanku poslat.

sumirprimus wrote: ↑13/09/2022 15:30

sime_cipol wrote: ↑13/09/2022 15:26

Zato sto to mogu platiti. Kad bi neko pokusao imati budzet upola kao njihov, drzava bi propala kroz 5 godina. Oni tako rade 100 godina sto bi se reklo, zato jesu bez premca i bilo kakvog ozbiljnog suparnika

ha jebga, pokri se kolko si dug, oni dugi sta sad..najjaci opstaju.. shit happnes i tako to.. imaju sistem koji zasad fercera.
posalju ukrima himars bez da mrdnu i dovedu u pitanje opstanak ruske vojske sunce ti zarko dje to ima nisu mrdnuli goozicom

plavi_E wrote: ↑13/09/2022 18:07

karanana wrote: ↑13/09/2022 17:50

nista, moracemo hanku poslat.

Pored onakvih mladi Ukrajinki da saljemu nasu staru Hanku. Hanka jedino da bude instruktor.

"Work (on the counteroffensive - ed.) began shortly after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told his generals that he wanted to take a tangible step to demonstrate that his country could repel the Russian invasion. By his order, the Ukrainian military developed a plan for a broad offensive in the south to return Kherson and cut off Mariupol from Russian troops in the east.
However, both Ukrainian generals and US officials believed that such an offensive would lead to significant losses among the armed forces. The time was also decisive, since the counteroffensive had to be carried out before the cold weather, so that Russian President Vladimir Putin could not use gas pressure on Europe.
In the summer, when the Ukrainian and American military tested a large-scale offensive in the south in the form of a game, they found that it would fail. These results were reported to Zelensky, after which Kyiv's plan changed. "Instead of one major offensive, the Ukrainian military offered two. The first is in Kherson, which most likely took days or weeks before getting tangible results due to the concentration of Russian troops. Another was planned near Kharkiv.
The United States, Britain and Ukraine assessed this plan and the three sides agreed that the new plan would work. At the same time, the publication points out that the offensive in the Kherson direction has never been fictitious or deceptive. "The plan, which emerged during discussions in mid-summer, relied heavily on U.S. intelligence and high-tech weapons. But U.S. officials insist that the merit of the offensive lies entirely with Mr. Zelensky and the Ukrainian military, who won a huge victory with relatively small forces in Kharkiv."

Milenkov buraz wrote: ↑13/09/2022 15:22

sumirprimus wrote: ↑13/09/2022 15:14 ameri nemaju tih problema, u amera je veci broj propratne logistike od vojnika sa puskom u ruci...
ameri misle bukvalno na sve. i njima niko ne moze naci zamjerku realno.
kupe iskustva iz svakog konflikta u koji su usli, i sve analiziraju, i iz svega vade zakljucke.
nihovsistem je trenutno nenadjebiv u istoriji ratovanja.

Istina, volio neko USA ili ne oni su ne nadjebivi. Treba samo vratiti film i analizirati kako su Ruse obavještajno poklopili, šta poklopili, devastirali Ruse. Sve su znali, kada Putler ide u WC i kada prdi, kad aje izdao naredbu, kada su krenuli. Toliko je nestvarno i nadrealno izgledalo da i neki saveznici nisu vjerovali Amerikancima ali kada su krenule prve rakete iz Rusije prema Ukrajini onda je svima bilo jasno.

video wrote: ↑13/09/2022 18:45