Forum Klix.ba

insomnia78 wrote:Ma ti si jos i dobar.

ioannes wrote:o čemu vas dvojica baljezgate?
ne vodi se tako strateški rat....
*ebala je sebe ta vlada koja vas ima u stručnom štabu

Young Erotica wrote:Sad kreće talamasca, samo je pitanje ko će više najebati izmedju zaraženih strana.

BREAKING: Israeli security cabinet will convene for an urgent meeting at 13:30 in Tel-Aviv to discuss tensions on the northern border

ioannes wrote:o čemu vas dvojica baljezgate?
ne vodi se tako strateški rat....
*ebala je sebe ta vlada koja vas ima u stručnom štabu

1.Several months ago @INSSIsrael pointed out two strategic vectors on collision course: Iran’s resolve to establish a robust and advanced military presence in Syria Vs Israel’s determination to prevent it from happening.

2.Tonight’s strike’s power and precision point to a state-grade intelligence and operational capabilities, not to rebels

3.Against the backdrop of the JCPOA crisis, Gaza riots plus the US embassy move to Jerusalem, the heating conflict between Iran and Israel in Syria now joins what we coined as the “Explosive May Days”

4.Keep in mind additional background issues: Hizbulla’s restraint, while busy with the Lebanon elections, the US clarifying to Putin and to Tehran that Israel is not alone – in both Pompeo-Netanyahu’s press conference and in Netanyahu-Trump’s phone call

5.Three possible target explanations:advanced Iranian ballistic missiles capabilities built up in Syria,thwarting an Iranian retaliation against Israel,after the T4 strike or the two combined.

6.The explosion’s power was caused by the target, most probably an SSM stockpile, and not by the striking munitions.

7.Reports of multiple Iranians killed, if true, add up to Iran’s open account with Israel, but also stress the latter’s resolve to impose growing costs on Tehran for its digging-in efforts in Syria.

8.Restraining factors: growing criticism in Iran against Gen. Suleimani,sent to rescue Assad and chose to provoke Israel in addition;Iran declining to provide more reasons for Trump to withdraw from JCPOA;Russia’s risk of an escalation to war undermining its achievements in Syria

9... and finally, most parties’ interest to avoid an all out war.The question on trial is sharpening: Jerusalem’s resolve and power, set against Iran’s determination and Quds Force.

insomnia78 wrote:

ioannes wrote:o čemu vas dvojica baljezgate?
ne vodi se tako strateški rat....
*ebala je sebe ta vlada koja vas ima u stručnom štabu

Naravno da ne vodi.
Sve je pomno planirano

1.Several months ago @INSSIsrael pointed out two strategic vectors on collision course: Iran’s resolve to establish a robust and advanced military presence in Syria Vs Israel’s determination to prevent it from happening.

2.Tonight’s strike’s power and precision point to a state-grade intelligence and operational capabilities, not to rebels

3.Against the backdrop of the JCPOA crisis, Gaza riots plus the US embassy move to Jerusalem, the heating conflict between Iran and Israel in Syria now joins what we coined as the “Explosive May Days”

4.Keep in mind additional background issues: Hizbulla’s restraint, while busy with the Lebanon elections, the US clarifying to Putin and to Tehran that Israel is not alone – in both Pompeo-Netanyahu’s press conference and in Netanyahu-Trump’s phone call

5.Three possible target explanations:advanced Iranian ballistic missiles capabilities built up in Syria,thwarting an Iranian retaliation against Israel,after the T4 strike or the two combined.

6.The explosion’s power was caused by the target, most probably an SSM stockpile, and not by the striking munitions.

7.Reports of multiple Iranians killed, if true, add up to Iran’s open account with Israel, but also stress the latter’s resolve to impose growing costs on Tehran for its digging-in efforts in Syria.

8.Restraining factors: growing criticism in Iran against Gen. Suleimani,sent to rescue Assad and chose to provoke Israel in addition;Iran declining to provide more reasons for Trump to withdraw from JCPOA;Russia’s risk of an escalation to war undermining its achievements in Syria

9... and finally, most parties’ interest to avoid an all out war.The question on trial is sharpening: Jerusalem’s resolve and power, set against Iran’s determination and Quds Force.

insomnia78 wrote:Takticki nuklearni udari?

ioannes wrote:

insomnia78 wrote:Takticki nuklearni udari?

pa eno gore par postova iza savoxxx piše

kaže : "
Israel Drops Tactical Nuclear Bomb On Syria "

o sunce ti žarko

Slom pobunjenika u jugozapadnoj Siriji i dalje operacije SAA
...
Poslednja velika koncentracija boraca FSA i HTS u celoj pokrajini Homs – sa izuzetkom pustinjskog predela oko koalcione baze kod mesta At-Tanf vrlo male strateške i političke važnosti – predstavlja džep severno od grada Homsa. Ovaj džep, površine preko 900 kvadratnih kilometara ima najmanje 10 000 civila i nepoznat broj boraca, neki navodi tvrde čak i preko 5000. Počevši još od 22. aprila vojno krilo Sirijske Socijal-Nacionalističke Partije (SSNP) uz pomoć lokalnog NDF-a izvelo je niz napada na istoku ovog džepa u pokušaju da ,,ispipa“ odbranu pobunjenika i njihove taktike. 25. aprila SAA se priključila ovim napadima a prva velika pojačanja krenula su iz Damaska i istočnog Kalamuna ka Homsu 27. aprila i to pripadnici 4. Oklopno Mehanizovane Brigade, pripadnici Ba’ath Legije Petog korpusa SAA kao i pripadnici elitni jedinice Tigrovi (Al-Quwat Al-Nimr, arap. prim. aut.) naoružani, ironično, oruđem zarobljenim od FSA i HTS prilikom oslobađanja džepova istočno od Damaska u prethodnim nedeljama. 28. aprila započela su obimna granatiranja i bombardovanja kao uvertira u napad koji je sad samo pitanje dana.

U toku pisanja ovog teksta, granatiranje i raketiranje džepa traje neprekidno, a pristgle su prve vesti o spontanim predajama manjih grupa pobunjenika u određenim graničnim mestima. Gotovo izvesno je da će napad na severni Homs pratiti šablon koji je korišten prilikom slamanja prethodnih mesta otpora pobunjenika – neprekidno bombardovanje sa zemlje i iz vazduha u trajanju od 3 do 5 dana omogući će raspoređivanje državnih snaga na ključne pozicije za napad. Iz dosadašnjeg iskustva, napadi ovih razmera počinjali su uglavnom ne kasnije od 5 dana nakon početka artiljerijske i pripreme iz vazduha.

U prvim fazama napada razne pro-vladine milicije i NDF pokušavaće da probiju linije pobunjenika, dok će glavnina snaga SAA koristiti svu raspoloživu vatrenu moć da eliminiše uporne tačke i koncentraciju otpora pobunjeničkih snaga koje će morati da otkriju svoje položaje jednom kad kopneni napad počne. Ovakvu taktiku SAA je razvila upravo nakon druge ofanzive na Homs 2012. godine a kao odgovor na velike gubitke koje je tada pretrpela kai posledicu klasičnog frontalnog napada.
...

https://www.globaldefence.info/slom-pob ... acije-saa/

Sukob Kurda i sirijskih snaga u dolini Eufrata

...
Po svemu sudeći, na čelu ovog napada bila je milicija poznatija kao Bakir brigada, koja je početkom aprila najavljivala ofanzivu na Kurde koji drže provinciju Deir ez Zor istočno od Eufrata, gde se ujedno nalaze i velika naftna postrojenja.
...
Bakir Brigada osnovana je u provinciji Alepo 2012. godine od strane pojedinaca iz arapskog plemena Al Bakara i dva brata u javnosti poznati kao Halid Al Hasan i Abu Al Abas. Ova jedinica se 2015. pridružila Sirijskim odbrambenim snagama (NDF) sa kojima je zajedno učestvovala u borbama protiv Islamske države u Alepu i Deir Ez Zoru. Veliki deo noružanja ovoj grupi pristizao je iz Irana, među kojima se nalaze i neka sofisticiranija sredstva.
...

https://www.globaldefence.info/sukob-ku ... i-eufrata/

Challenger_ wrote:Samo da vas cujem kada se planeta zatrese. Tada se sjetite vaseg hinjavog i kukavickog likovanja.