Evo ti originalni tekst (mogao si i njega podijeliti, da ne naprezemo neurone bezveze):
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m- ... hose-sarin
I onda evo ti tekst koji analizira Hershov tekst:
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/12/sey ... about.html
Iz naslova mozes procitati o cemo se radi. S obzirom da su tekstovi dugacki, izvaditi cu samo jedan citat, sa imenom i prezimenom i titulom:
"Theodore Postol, a professor of technology and national security at MIT, reviewed the UN photos with a group of his colleagues and concluded that the large calibre rocket was an improvised munition that was very likely manufactured locally. The rocket in the photos, he added, fails to match the specifications of a similar but smaller rocket known to be in the Syrian arsenal. The New York Times, again relying on data in the UN report, also analysed the flight path of two of the spent rockets that were believed to have carried sarin, and concluded that the angle of descent ‘pointed directly’ to their being fired from a Syrian army base more than nine kilometres from the landing zone. Postol, who has served as the scientific adviser to the chief of naval operations in the Pentagon, said that the assertions in theTimes and elsewhere ‘were not based on klix observations’."
I na kraju, evo ti lik koji je napisao tekst na koji se pozivas:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliot_Higgins
"Eliot Higgins was born in 1979. In 2012, when Higgins began blogging the Syrian civil war, he was an unemployed finance and admin worker who spent his days taking care of his child at home. Higgins' analyses of Syrian weapons, which began as a hobby out of his home in his spare time..."
Porediti profesora as MIT-a, dugogodisnjeg saradnika Pentagona i ovog Eliota je, pa u najmanju ruku, smijesno. Ja vise vjerujem profesoru nego ovom koji iz hobija analizira Sirijsku krizu...
nigdje nikakvog dokaza, linka, video klipa i slično..
