Forum Klix.ba

Ja_Ja wrote:Danas i kod jednih i kod drugih NEW YORK. Republikanci 95 delegata, Demokrate 247. Kod reposa bez obzira na NY sve jos uvijek sirom otvoreno. Kod demokrata pobjeda Hillary moze i definitivno zatvoriti vrata Sandersu dok bi njegova pobjeda u NY mogla da bude i odlucujuca odskocna daska da je prestigne do kraja mjeseca po broju osvjenih delegata.

vivaldi wrote:kad ce prvi rezultati po nasem vremenu?

sigh wrote:Pomijesani exit pollovi. 44 % biraca bez fakulteta sto upucuje na veliki broj mladih glasaca, 38 % bi zelilo da je Obama bio vise progresivan, 31 % liberalnih i 38% djelimicno liberalnih glasaca.Medju najbitnijim kvalitetima kandidata su njihove brige 25 % i iskrenost 29 %. Ovo sve ide u prilog Sandersu.

32 % najvise cijeni iskustvo sto ide u prilog Hillary. 61 % posto LGBT populacije podrazava Hillary ( dok 73 % te populacije u dobi 18-24 podrzava Sandersa ). Vecina demokrata misli da je Hillary osvjezila partiju. Medju crnim glasacima Hillary vodi 75 % na 25 %.

Nesto sto bi eventualno takodjer priblizilo Bernija u utrci je odluka suda po predmetu priznavanja zamjenskih glasackih listica za glasace koji su registrovani kao demokrate ali koji iz nekog razloga nedostaju iz glasackog registra.

jefferson wrote:
AKo izgubi izgubit ce najvise zbog njegovog odnosa prema proizvodjacima oruzja.

MaroonBrigade wrote:To je exit poll. Vidjecemo na sta ce liciti stvarni brojevi.

Ja_Ja wrote:Nisu ni krenuli brojat CNN Trumpa proglasise pobjednikom.

relativno84 wrote:

Ja_Ja wrote:Nisu ni krenuli brojat CNN Trumpa proglasise pobjednikom.

Covjek dere sve redom, al ne moze da se opusti jer sistem ima namjeru da ga zajebe

sigh wrote:

jefferson wrote:
AKo izgubi izgubit ce najvise zbog njegovog odnosa prema proizvodjacima oruzja.

Ta pozicija me je bas iznervirala posljednih par dana. Njegova pozicija je sasvim logicna, drugo rjesenje je zabraniti prodaju i proizvodnju oruzja, medjutim to Hillary ne smije reci pa se sve svede na nekakve nelogicne napade. Nekako nisam mogao vjerovati neku noc na debati kad su ga pitali da li bi se izvinio roditeljima Sandy Hook masakra kao da nosi neku odgovornost za to. Lik ima D- od NRA.

Carter, who served as president from 1977 to 1981, added the amount of money required to compete in the modern American political system was no longer practical and that he himself would be unable and unwilling to participate in elections today.

"There's no way now for you to get the Democratic or Republican nomination without being able to raise two or three hundred million dollars, or more," Carter said. "I would not be inclined to do that, and I would not be capable of doing it."

Actually, he's right. As it turns out, Carter's comment is increasingly prescient.

In 2014, researchers at Princeton and Northwestern universities caused a minor uproar after they concluded the U.S, was not a democracy as is commonly assumed but, in fact, an oligarchy as Carter has now suggested. "The preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically nonsignificant impact upon public policy," Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page wrote in their analysis.

Their conclusion, that the opinions of ordinary Americans are functionally irrelevant toward shaping public policy, shine a light on how things like gun control legislation can be repeatedly stymied despite overwhelming public support for policies like background checks.

"I would tend to agree that the plutocratic tendencies of the system are now tending to overwhelm democratic principles," Peter Rajsingh, an adjunct professor of finance at New York University, told Mic.

Saian wrote:http://mic.com/articles/125813/jimmy-ca ... .RXPTYaQhH

Carter, who served as president from 1977 to 1981, added the amount of money required to compete in the modern American political system was no longer practical and that he himself would be unable and unwilling to participate in elections today.

"There's no way now for you to get the Democratic or Republican nomination without being able to raise two or three hundred million dollars, or more," Carter said. "I would not be inclined to do that, and I would not be capable of doing it."

Actually, he's right. As it turns out, Carter's comment is increasingly prescient.

In 2014, researchers at Princeton and Northwestern universities caused a minor uproar after they concluded the U.S, was not a democracy as is commonly assumed but, in fact, an oligarchy as Carter has now suggested. "The preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically nonsignificant impact upon public policy," Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page wrote in their analysis.

Their conclusion, that the opinions of ordinary Americans are functionally irrelevant toward shaping public policy, shine a light on how things like gun control legislation can be repeatedly stymied despite overwhelming public support for policies like background checks.

"I would tend to agree that the plutocratic tendencies of the system are now tending to overwhelm democratic principles," Peter Rajsingh, an adjunct professor of finance at New York University, told Mic.