Šta trenutno čitate?

[zlo zlo]

2x utvrđivanje gradiva
the wheel of time

petnajstologija

[Nastasia]

Umberto Galimberti
Neugodni gost
Nihilizam i mladi

[pizarro]

oh nasty, koliko ti to knjiga mjesecno procitas?

[Nastasia]

oh nasty, koliko ti to knjiga mjesecno procitas?

Na svako 3-4 dana jedna knjiga.

[pizarro]

oh nasty, koliko ti to knjiga mjesecno procitas?

Na svako 3-4 dana jedna knjiga.

pravo vrijedna

[Gojeni H]

Outliers - Malcolm Gladwell

Jos jedna knjiga u nizu pokusaja zadovoljavanja publike ranog 21. vijeka i pitanja svih pitanja materijalistickog svijeta - Sta je tajna uspjeha?

Uspjeh je naravno definisan kroz prizmu materijalisticki i "title" vodjenu sliku svijeta.

Bez obzira na par dobrih istrazivanja, procitati samo ako je alternativa Harry Potter ili Divergant.

[4L0n3]

2x utvrđivanje gradiva
the wheel of time
petnajstologija

Uh, gdje nabavi ovo?

ontopic:

[zlo zlo]

2x utvrđivanje gradiva
the wheel of time
petnajstologija

Uh, gdje nabavi ovo?

ima sve knjige na balkanu u epub formatu

[4L0n3]

ima sve knjige na balkanu u epub formatu

nasao, hvala

[Nastasia]

Pitanje Bruna, A. Hemon

[MarlboroGold]

Richard Branson - Finding my Virginity (autobiografija)

[MaD_ProfessoR]

Igor Mandić; predsmrtni dnevnik

[horkesh]

2x utvrđivanje gradiva
the wheel of time

petnajstologija

Kako ti se da pobogu. Hajde prvih nekoliko i nekako, ali kad dođe do one vremenske posude ili kako se već zvala...

[zlo zlo]

2x utvrđivanje gradiva
the wheel of time

petnajstologija

Kako ti se da pobogu. Hajde prvih nekoliko i nekako, ali kad dođe do one vremenske posude ili kako se već zvala...

zdjela vjetrova

da mi se, super su knjige, napeta priča a kasnije tek je obavezno popratit najdražeg lika Mata i kako će završit s Tylin

[horkesh]

Kako ti se da pobogu. Hajde prvih nekoliko i nekako, ali kad dođe do one vremenske posude ili kako se već zvala...

zdjela vjetrova

da mi se, super su knjige, napeta priča a kasnije tek je obavezno popratit najdražeg lika Mata i kako će završit s Tylin

To ona što ga siluje i nakon toga više nije šarmantni rogue, nego ga kasnije ona mala obrće oko malog prsta Doduše, sve žene tamo se igraju s muškarcima

Pročitao sam i ja serijal dva puta doduše, ali to je bilo dok je Jordan još bio živ Kasnije samo pročitao ona zadnja tri dijela. Uživaj

[zlo zlo]

to su knjige koje uživam citati, Brandon Sanderson je odličan pisac i po meni uspješno je slijedio Jordanov stil i završio serijal i njegove knjige volim pravo, Mistborn triologije i svake ostale koje se dočepala, svaka mu odlična Abercrombie, williams, Martin, Kay, Hob, Erikson, Rothfuss obožavam ih

[horkesh]

Sanderson i Stormlight Archive je vrh, Mistborn meni onako Abercrombie sve knjige fenomenalne, a Erikson i Malazan su mi srcu drage, pročitao sam ih jedno četiri puta sigurno Rothfuss postaje idući Martin koliko mu treba da završi

Zanimljivo, upravo čitam nešto staro od Hobba. Eto, da ne bude da trolam, upisujem se i ja.

[Bloo]

Igor Mandić; predsmrtni dnevnik

Čula sam da je izvrsna.
Ima li uopšte kupiti u Sa?

[MaD_ProfessoR]

Igor Mandić; predsmrtni dnevnik

Čula sam da je izvrsna.
Ima li uopšte kupiti u Sa?

Ima

[zlo zlo]

Sanderson i Stormlight Archive je vrh, Mistborn meni onako Abercrombie sve knjige fenomenalne, a Erikson i Malazan su mi srcu drage, pročitao sam ih jedno četiri puta sigurno Rothfuss postaje idući Martin koliko mu treba da završi

Zanimljivo, upravo čitam nešto staro od Hobba. Eto, da ne bude da trolam, upisujem se i ja.

a vala i da film i serije snime, ja svojima svake po godine najavim kingkillera a još nisu ni glumce odabrali i tako 2god

[King_Kenny]

Igor Mandić; predsmrtni dnevnik

Čula sam da je izvrsna.
Ima li uopšte kupiti u Sa?

Ima

I meni je knjiga na listi.

[ExNihilo]

https://www.klix.ba/magazin/kultura/umr ... /180523007

Ne dobi i neće ga ni dobiti Roth. Nobela.

[Gojeni H]

EDIT: Drugaciji pogled na historiju monoteistickih religija, primarno krscanstva, razvoj filozofske misli u zapadnoj kulturi, ... analiza razloga bavljenja krscanstva naukom, za razliku od budizma i hinduizma npr., ... pad uloge religije u zapadnoevropskim drustvima, ali ne i u Americi ...

Vjera u obredima, ritualima i obicajima ... sve u redu osim sto Armstrongova zaboravlja da ljudi ne vjeruju zato sto je to bolje za drustvo. U takvoj situaciji, anksioznost se samo povecava. Ljudi vjeruju - zato sto vjeruju, ne zato sto neki drzavnik ili filozof misli da je to prakticno i dobro za drustvo.

Dobra knjiga.

[ExNihilo]

Jako

Zaboliće me glava... najviše od Heideggera

Danas naletih na ovaj odlomak o Heideggerovoj upotrebi jezika, pa me podsjeti na tebe.

As his readers soon notice, Heidegger tends to reject familiar philosophical terms in favour of new ones which he coins himself. He leaves the German Sein or Being more or less as it is, but when it comes to talking about the questioner for whom its Being is in question (i.e. me, a human), he strenuously avoids talk of humanity, man, mind, soul or consciousness, because of the scientific, religious or metaphysical assumptions such words conceal. Instead, he speaks of ‘Dasein’, a word normally meaning ‘existence’ in a general way, and compounded of da (there) and sein (to be). Thus, it means ‘there-being’, or ‘being-there’.

The effect is at once disconcerting and intriguing. Reading Heidegger, and feeling (as one often does) that you recognise an experience he is describing, you want to say, ‘Yes, that’s me!’ But the word itself deflects you from this interpretation; it forces you to keep questioning. Just getting into the habit of saying Dasein takes you halfway into Heidegger’s world. It is so important a term that English translators tend to leave it in the original German; an early partial French translation by Henry Corbin rendered it as ‘réalité humaine’, which created another layer of confusion.

Why, one often wails, can’t Heidegger speak plainly? His tangled and unnatural terms invite parody — as in Günter Grass’ 1963 novel Dog Years, where a character falls under the influence of an unnamed philosopher and goes around calling underdone potatoes ‘spuds forgetful of Being’, and clearing rodents out of the kitchen’s water pipes while wondering, ‘Why rats and not other essents? Why anything at all rather than nothing?’ One might think that, if Heidegger had anything worth saying, he could have communicated it in ordinary language.

The fact is that he does not want to be ordinary, and he may not even want to communicate in the usual sense. He wants to make the familiar obscure, and to vex us. George Steiner thought that Heidegger’s purpose was less to be understood than to be experienced through a ‘felt strangeness’. It is something like the ‘alienation’ or estrangement effect used by Bertholt Brecht in his theatre, which is designed to block you from becoming too caught up in the story and falling for the delusion of familiarity. Heidegger’s language keeps you on edge. It is dynamic, obtrusive, sometimes ridiculous and often forceful; on a page of Heidegger, things are typically presented as surging or thrusting, as being thrown forward, lit up or broken open. Heidegger admitted that his way of writing produced some ‘awkwardness’, but he thought that a small price to pay for overturning the history of philosophy and bringing us back to Being.

[MarlboroGold]

Jako

Zaboliće me glava... najviše od Heideggera

Danas naletih na ovaj odlomak o Heideggerovoj upotrebi jezika, pa me podsjeti na tebe.

As his readers soon notice, Heidegger tends to reject familiar philosophical terms in favour of new ones which he coins himself. He leaves the German Sein or Being more or less as it is, but when it comes to talking about the questioner for whom its Being is in question (i.e. me, a human), he strenuously avoids talk of humanity, man, mind, soul or consciousness, because of the scientific, religious or metaphysical assumptions such words conceal. Instead, he speaks of ‘Dasein’, a word normally meaning ‘existence’ in a general way, and compounded of da (there) and sein (to be). Thus, it means ‘there-being’, or ‘being-there’.

The effect is at once disconcerting and intriguing. Reading Heidegger, and feeling (as one often does) that you recognise an experience he is describing, you want to say, ‘Yes, that’s me!’ But the word itself deflects you from this interpretation; it forces you to keep questioning. Just getting into the habit of saying Dasein takes you halfway into Heidegger’s world. It is so important a term that English translators tend to leave it in the original German; an early partial French translation by Henry Corbin rendered it as ‘réalité humaine’, which created another layer of confusion.

Why, one often wails, can’t Heidegger speak plainly? His tangled and unnatural terms invite parody — as in Günter Grass’ 1963 novel Dog Years, where a character falls under the influence of an unnamed philosopher and goes around calling underdone potatoes ‘spuds forgetful of Being’, and clearing rodents out of the kitchen’s water pipes while wondering, ‘Why rats and not other essents? Why anything at all rather than nothing?’ One might think that, if Heidegger had anything worth saying, he could have communicated it in ordinary language.

The fact is that he does not want to be ordinary, and he may not even want to communicate in the usual sense. He wants to make the familiar obscure, and to vex us. George Steiner thought that Heidegger’s purpose was less to be understood than to be experienced through a ‘felt strangeness’. It is something like the ‘alienation’ or estrangement effect used by Bertholt Brecht in his theatre, which is designed to block you from becoming too caught up in the story and falling for the delusion of familiarity. Heidegger’s language keeps you on edge. It is dynamic, obtrusive, sometimes ridiculous and often forceful; on a page of Heidegger, things are typically presented as surging or thrusting, as being thrown forward, lit up or broken open. Heidegger admitted that his way of writing produced some ‘awkwardness’, but he thought that a small price to pay for overturning the history of philosophy and bringing us back to Being.

Jedinstven je u svakom slučaju... pogotovo boldirano.