Pennsylvania is prohibited from certifying the rest of its election results in down-ballot races — and from taking any further action in regard to yesterday’s certification of the presidential race — pending a hearing on Friday in an appellate court.
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in an order signed by Judge Patricia McCullough, issued an injunction Wednesday that stops the state from continuing its certification, and intends to hear evidence in a case filed by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly and GOP congressional candidate Sean Parnell about the constitutionality of mail-in ballots.
The hearing will be held on Friday morning.
The state certified the results in the race for president on Tuesday, giving its 20 electoral votes to Democrat Joe Biden and his running mate, California Sen. Kamala Harris. The court order said the state is prohibited from acting “to the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results” of the races for president and vice president.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro wrote on Twitter: “This order does not impact yesterday’s appointment of electors. We will be filing an appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court momentarily.”
Kelly and Parnell are arguing that state lawmakers violated Pennsylvania’s Constitution by adopting Act 77 last year, which expanded the mail-in balloting option to let all qualified voters to vote by mail without an excuse. They allege that absentee voting — which required an excuse from a set of allowed reasons — was rebranded as no-excuse mail-in voting “absent any constitutional authority.”
The Republican-controlled state Legislature responded, in legal filings, that the case should be dismissed because Act 77 didn’t alter the requirements of who constitutes a qualified voter, and that the Legislature is constitutionally authorized to prescribe the method by which those electors may cast their votes.
Lawyers for Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, Gov. Tom Wolf and the state — also named as defendants in the suit — noted that Act 77 said all constitutional challenges were to be brought within 180 days of effective date, which “came and went without any facial challenge to the constitutionality of Act 77’s provisions.”
“At no time during the 180-day period, the run-up to the primary election, or the runup to the general election did Petitioners (or anyone else) claim in any proceeding that Act 77 was unconstitutional on its fact,” the state’s lawyers wrote, noting that Kelly and Parnell ran in the 2020 primary and general election, “presumably garnering votes cast on the same mail-in ballots that they now claim to be unconstitutional.”
Elektori su dodijeljeni, to je gotova prica. Posljednji trzaji kmecavaca cije tuzbe sudovi obaraju lijevo i desno.
#10002 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 26/11/2020 10:59
by video
nosara wrote: ↑26/11/2020 10:50
Jebena pravna drzava i njene komplikacije.
zubi wrote: ↑25/11/2020 01:15
Prosipao je zavjere o koroni i cipovanju, do nove godine nista od razonode...
Cuj, zar se i za iznosenje misljenja suprotnog oficijelnom drzavnom moze dobiti ban?
Ovo kao u komunizmu onda ako je to tacno.
Ne smijes u prepunom kinu onako vikati - Pozar!
Za post u kojem pise ovo: "Uglavnom, vakcine sadrze u sebi elemente koji stanovnistvo cini podloznijim kontroli uma..." bi se trebalo ici u zatvor, a ne u Banovice, pa nek prica materi...
Obicno se na represiju zale oni koji bi je, da su u prilici, prvi provodili...
Sloboda govora podrazumjeva i da se postuju vrijednosti koje su dovele do slobode govora. Uzeti je samu za sebe, odrazava nepoznavanje nekih od osnovnih postulata demokratije.
Takvi su, oko korone i mnogih drugih stvari, bili Trump i trumpisti. Hebo poreznu utaju, covjek se ogrijesio o sigurnost gradjana...
Tako i u komunizmu bilo.
Imas potpunu slobodu govora osim....
I za pisanje ili govor o tome se ide u zatvor
#10009 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 26/11/2020 12:24
by zubi
RandomAndCasual wrote: ↑26/11/2020 12:16
Tako i u komunizmu bilo.
Imas potpunu slobodu govora osim....
I za pisanje ili govor o tome se ide u zatvor
To ti zivio u komunizmu pa znas...
MI samo socijalizam imali, ti jos napredniji, svaka cast
#10010 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 26/11/2020 13:51
by corolla02
Ima ona sreli se rus i amerikanac, ko može šta da kaže predsjedniku u njegovom uredu; kaže amer ja mogu unici u bijelu kuću i za presjednikov sto i reci mu ne svidja mi se kamo i kako vodite ovu državu; kaže rus, ih nije ti ništa i ja mogu tako u kremlj unici i za presjednikov sto sjesti i reci ne svidja mi se kako i kuda trump vodi svoju zemlju
#10011 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 26/11/2020 14:55
by ultima_palabra
nosara wrote: ↑26/11/2020 10:50
Jebena pravna drzava i njene komplikacije.
Dobar vam je skor u pravnoj drzavi, 1-35 ili tako nesto
Dobar vam je skor u pravnoj drzavi, 1-35 ili tako nesto
Budi pametan. I hvali se na sav glas, ko zna sta ce biti ovih par mjeseci.
Dobar fond, valja dugove podmiriti. Nesto kao Trump University
Imaju i demokrate isto ovo, Biden i Kamala su prosili po twitteru, ono "chip in" fazon
#10015 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 26/11/2020 21:33
by vaučer
Misliš kad su skupljali novac da mogu organizirati novu administraciju jer je narandžasta beba blokirala sredstva za novu administraciju preko one debele nakaze. Da, potpuno isto kao Trumpovo skupljanje love za besmisleno parničenje dok ustvari sve trpa sebi u džep.
Pennsylvania is prohibited from certifying the rest of its election results in down-ballot races — and from taking any further action in regard to yesterday’s certification of the presidential race — pending a hearing on Friday in an appellate court.
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in an order signed by Judge Patricia McCullough, issued an injunction Wednesday that stops the state from continuing its certification, and intends to hear evidence in a case filed by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly and GOP congressional candidate Sean Parnell about the constitutionality of mail-in ballots.
The hearing will be held on Friday morning.
The state certified the results in the race for president on Tuesday, giving its 20 electoral votes to Democrat Joe Biden and his running mate, California Sen. Kamala Harris. The court order said the state is prohibited from acting “to the extent that there remains any further action to perfect the certification of the results” of the races for president and vice president.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro wrote on Twitter: “This order does not impact yesterday’s appointment of electors. We will be filing an appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court momentarily.”
Kelly and Parnell are arguing that state lawmakers violated Pennsylvania’s Constitution by adopting Act 77 last year, which expanded the mail-in balloting option to let all qualified voters to vote by mail without an excuse. They allege that absentee voting — which required an excuse from a set of allowed reasons — was rebranded as no-excuse mail-in voting “absent any constitutional authority.”
The Republican-controlled state Legislature responded, in legal filings, that the case should be dismissed because Act 77 didn’t alter the requirements of who constitutes a qualified voter, and that the Legislature is constitutionally authorized to prescribe the method by which those electors may cast their votes.
Lawyers for Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, Gov. Tom Wolf and the state — also named as defendants in the suit — noted that Act 77 said all constitutional challenges were to be brought within 180 days of effective date, which “came and went without any facial challenge to the constitutionality of Act 77’s provisions.”
“At no time during the 180-day period, the run-up to the primary election, or the runup to the general election did Petitioners (or anyone else) claim in any proceeding that Act 77 was unconstitutional on its fact,” the state’s lawyers wrote, noting that Kelly and Parnell ran in the 2020 primary and general election, “presumably garnering votes cast on the same mail-in ballots that they now claim to be unconstitutional.”
Elektori su dodijeljeni, to je gotova prica. Posljednji trzaji kmecavaca cije tuzbe sudovi obaraju lijevo i desno.
Danas je ispusio i to. Opet.
So much winning.
#10020 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 27/11/2020 20:57
by General War
Ima jedna epizoda" South Park" gdje Sarah Palin namjerno glumi glupacu...kako bi McCain, Obama...ukrali neki dragulj dok se amerika podjelila...tako i ovo mi se cini da ima nesto iza zavjese sto se desava sto ne vidimo...jer nemuguce je izigravati degena ovoliko ko Trump i advokat Juliani...tip bio na naslovnici the Time..i odjednom ovoloki klovna da izigrava nema sanse...i ovo razvlacenje izbora, jednostavno nema logike. Da je neka africka zemlja...pa hajd...ovako nebi me iznenadilo da se iznenadimo
#10021 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 27/11/2020 21:56
by ultima_palabra
Kae Jenna Ellis: “activist judicial machinery in PA”, a ono sva trojica sudija konzervativci, predsjednika imenovao Trump, a drugu dvojica Dubya Bush
#10022 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 27/11/2020 23:35
by Maxxtro
jeza u ledja wrote: ↑27/11/2020 20:34
Danas je ispusio i to. Opet.
So much winning.
#DiaperDon
#10023 Re: USA - Izbori za predsjednika 2020
Posted: 28/11/2020 16:40
by geralt
Nakon ponovnog prebrojavanja glasova u Wisconsinu koje je narucio i platio Trump, prednost Bidena se povecala za 132 glasa
u bijelu kuću i za presjednikov sto i reci mu ne svidja mi se kamo i kako vodite ovu državu; kaže rus, ih nije ti ništa i ja mogu tako u kremlj unici 
