Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ide u Hrvatsku
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#101 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Dok je Sveti Irinej iz Republike Kosovo drzao govor,Kapetan Dragan je zamisljao kako bi opalio Kosovsku Devojku:
Last edited by livingstone on 08/10/2009 13:08, edited 1 time in total.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#102 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Da je Australija Drzava sa najvise cuda na svijetu pokazuje i ova danasnja informacija:
Kazu,da im je okorjeli kriminalac pobjegao iz najstrozijeg zatvora u kojem je Kapetan Dragan proveo okolo 4 godine.
Wednesday, 07 Oct 2009 11:06pm
Editors Note: The Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre is separately based near the Parklea Correctional Centre.
Police are hunting an inmate who’s escaped from a western Sydney correctional centre this evening.
About 7.30pm, police were called to the Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre (CDTCC), Parklea, after Soubhi Arja, 25, was found to be missing during a muster.
Police seek public assistance as they hunt prison escapee – Sydney’s west
Wednesday, 07 Oct 2009 11:06pm
Editors Note: The Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre is separately based near the Parklea Correctional Centre.
Police are hunting an inmate who’s escaped from a western Sydney correctional centre this evening.
About 7.30pm, police were called to the Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre (CDTCC), Parklea, after Soubhi Arja, 25, was found to be missing during a muster.
A search of the CDTCC failed to locate the man, who’s currently serving a prison term for armed robbery offences and shooting to avoid apprehension.
It’s believed Arja escaped from the Sentry Drive facility some time between 6.50 and 7.15pm today.
Police from Quakers Hill and Blacktown Local Area Commands, Polair and the Dog Unit are currently conducting a thorough search of surrounding suburbs in a bid to locate Arja.
A description of Arja, who’s considered dangerous, has also been circulated via police radio.
He’s been described as being of Middle Eastern/Mediterranean appearance, 181cm tall with medium build, black hair and brown eyes.
Police urge anyone who sees Arja not to approach him but contact Triple Zero (000) immediately.
Kazu,da im je okorjeli kriminalac pobjegao iz najstrozijeg zatvora u kojem je Kapetan Dragan proveo okolo 4 godine.
Wednesday, 07 Oct 2009 11:06pm
Editors Note: The Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre is separately based near the Parklea Correctional Centre.
Police are hunting an inmate who’s escaped from a western Sydney correctional centre this evening.
About 7.30pm, police were called to the Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre (CDTCC), Parklea, after Soubhi Arja, 25, was found to be missing during a muster.
Police seek public assistance as they hunt prison escapee – Sydney’s west
Wednesday, 07 Oct 2009 11:06pm
Editors Note: The Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre is separately based near the Parklea Correctional Centre.
Police are hunting an inmate who’s escaped from a western Sydney correctional centre this evening.
About 7.30pm, police were called to the Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre (CDTCC), Parklea, after Soubhi Arja, 25, was found to be missing during a muster.
A search of the CDTCC failed to locate the man, who’s currently serving a prison term for armed robbery offences and shooting to avoid apprehension.
It’s believed Arja escaped from the Sentry Drive facility some time between 6.50 and 7.15pm today.
Police from Quakers Hill and Blacktown Local Area Commands, Polair and the Dog Unit are currently conducting a thorough search of surrounding suburbs in a bid to locate Arja.
A description of Arja, who’s considered dangerous, has also been circulated via police radio.
He’s been described as being of Middle Eastern/Mediterranean appearance, 181cm tall with medium build, black hair and brown eyes.
Police urge anyone who sees Arja not to approach him but contact Triple Zero (000) immediately.
-
Brisbane
- Posts: 746
- Joined: 07/09/2007 04:03
#103 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Relax mate !livingstone wrote:Da je Australija Drzava sa najvise cuda na svijetu pokazuje i ova danasnja informacija:
Kazu,da im je okorjeli kriminalac pobjegao iz najstrozijeg zatvora u kojem je Kapetan Dragan proveo okolo 4 godine.
Wednesday, 07 Oct 2009 11:06pm
Editors Note: The Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre is separately based near the Parklea Correctional Centre.
Police are hunting an inmate who’s escaped from a western Sydney correctional centre this evening.
About 7.30pm, police were called to the Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre (CDTCC), Parklea, after Soubhi Arja, 25, was found to be missing during a muster.
Police seek public assistance as they hunt prison escapee – Sydney’s west
Wednesday, 07 Oct 2009 11:06pm
Editors Note: The Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre is separately based near the Parklea Correctional Centre.
Police are hunting an inmate who’s escaped from a western Sydney correctional centre this evening.
About 7.30pm, police were called to the Compulsory Drug Treatment Correctional Centre (CDTCC), Parklea, after Soubhi Arja, 25, was found to be missing during a muster.
A search of the CDTCC failed to locate the man, who’s currently serving a prison term for armed robbery offences and shooting to avoid apprehension.
It’s believed Arja escaped from the Sentry Drive facility some time between 6.50 and 7.15pm today.
Police from Quakers Hill and Blacktown Local Area Commands, Polair and the Dog Unit are currently conducting a thorough search of surrounding suburbs in a bid to locate Arja.
A description of Arja, who’s considered dangerous, has also been circulated via police radio.
He’s been described as being of Middle Eastern/Mediterranean appearance, 181cm tall with medium build, black hair and brown eyes.
Police urge anyone who sees Arja not to approach him but contact Triple Zero (000) immediately.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#104 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Odbjegli okorjeli kriminalac se je "dobrovoljno" vratio u zatvor:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/sydney-p ... -gqfx.html
http://www.smh.com.au/national/sydney-p ... -gqfx.html
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#106 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Prije je bilo rijeci o transformaciji Titovih "pionira" u teroristicke postrojbe takozvane Republike Srpske koje ce u ime takozvane "Velike Sbije" pocinit genocid nad Bosnjacima I Hrvatima.
Sta je natjeralo Zlatana Crnalica,Muslimana kome je Tito dao pravo da bude ravnopravan sa drugima,da odluci da zvijezdu zamijeni sa kokardom "teroristickog pokreta" Dragutina Mihajlovica.
Penzionisani "cetnicki" potpukovnik BiH, Zlatan Crnalic:
Zasluge u ratu:Bombardovanje civilnih gradova i bolnica u Hrvatskoj i BiH!
Na ovom specijalnom prilogu govori na "cistom" Bosanskom jeziku:
I da se rukuje sa "sitnim' Australskim lopovom i "pimpom"!
I Zlatane Crnalicu,"kljusino", zasto bi te u Sloveniji neko docekivao sa muzikom "Igrale se delije na sred zemlje Srbije" i sa transparentima na cirilici na kojima je pisalo "Dobro Dosli Celinac" i sl. a "starosjedioci Mahovljana(Bosnjaci i Hrvtati) su gledali sa cudjenjem iz svojih vjekovnih avlija "vaskrsavanje" Velike Srbije.
Zbog te "lokalne" neljubaznosti, Specijalci Banja-Luckog Korpusa ce u u ranim jutarnjim satima da napadnu katolicku crkvu sa rucnim bacacima iz zoljama.
Da se ne zaboravi!
Sta je natjeralo Zlatana Crnalica,Muslimana kome je Tito dao pravo da bude ravnopravan sa drugima,da odluci da zvijezdu zamijeni sa kokardom "teroristickog pokreta" Dragutina Mihajlovica.
Penzionisani "cetnicki" potpukovnik BiH, Zlatan Crnalic:
Zasluge u ratu:Bombardovanje civilnih gradova i bolnica u Hrvatskoj i BiH!
Na ovom specijalnom prilogu govori na "cistom" Bosanskom jeziku:
I da se rukuje sa "sitnim' Australskim lopovom i "pimpom"!
I Zlatane Crnalicu,"kljusino", zasto bi te u Sloveniji neko docekivao sa muzikom "Igrale se delije na sred zemlje Srbije" i sa transparentima na cirilici na kojima je pisalo "Dobro Dosli Celinac" i sl. a "starosjedioci Mahovljana(Bosnjaci i Hrvtati) su gledali sa cudjenjem iz svojih vjekovnih avlija "vaskrsavanje" Velike Srbije.
Zbog te "lokalne" neljubaznosti, Specijalci Banja-Luckog Korpusa ce u u ranim jutarnjim satima da napadnu katolicku crkvu sa rucnim bacacima iz zoljama.
Da se ne zaboravi!
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#107 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Da,Crnalicu Zlatane,
Minometni oddelek(Minobacacko odjeljenje) i Stotnik(kapetan) Vinko Čančer su vas "lepo ispratili" iz Dezele!
Doduse samo sa dva minobacaca i 8 granata je bilo dovoljno da nagarite is "Dezele"!
27. junija 1991, je oddelek minometov 82 mm iz 325. štaba TO pod vodstvom stotnika Vinka Čančerja napadel Letališče Cerklje ob Krki. Po tem dogodku so bojna letala JLA zapustila Slovenijo, kar je bilo velikega pomena za novo nastajajočo državo.
Minometni oddelek(Minobacacko odjeljenje) i Stotnik(kapetan) Vinko Čančer su vas "lepo ispratili" iz Dezele!
Doduse samo sa dva minobacaca i 8 granata je bilo dovoljno da nagarite is "Dezele"!
27. junija 1991, je oddelek minometov 82 mm iz 325. štaba TO pod vodstvom stotnika Vinka Čančerja napadel Letališče Cerklje ob Krki. Po tem dogodku so bojna letala JLA zapustila Slovenijo, kar je bilo velikega pomena za novo nastajajočo državo.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#108 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
The court dismissed an application by Serbian Dragan Vasiljkovic to have the Extradition Act ruled invalid.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/accused- ... -hbbg.html
Zamislite Drzavu(Australiju) u kojoj osumnjiceni ratni zlocinac za kojim je raspisana medjunarodna potjernica koja nalaze svim zemljama(clanicama) Interpola da uhaspe i privedu "fukanera" najblizem sudu,taj isti "fukaner" predlaze da zemlja ponisti Act po kojim bi se on mogoao izrucit.
Novine rekose:Cibe Srbijaneru(Serbian Dragan Vasiljkovic),ne rekose da je Australian!
Ovaj uskoro ide a i "Dragance" se sprema na put!
http://www.smh.com.au/national/accused- ... -hbbg.html
Zamislite Drzavu(Australiju) u kojoj osumnjiceni ratni zlocinac za kojim je raspisana medjunarodna potjernica koja nalaze svim zemljama(clanicama) Interpola da uhaspe i privedu "fukanera" najblizem sudu,taj isti "fukaner" predlaze da zemlja ponisti Act po kojim bi se on mogoao izrucit.
Novine rekose:Cibe Srbijaneru(Serbian Dragan Vasiljkovic),ne rekose da je Australian!
Ovaj uskoro ide a i "Dragance" se sprema na put!
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#109 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Dok se jos iscekuje odluka Australijskog Suda na odluku o navodnoj kleveti takozvanog "kapetana Dragana" od strane novinske kuce "The News Limited", pozivamo u pomoc zasticenog svjedoka B-161 koji ce svojim licnim svjedocenjem da "otera" u bajbok Srpskog "Barona Minhauzena" i da potvrdi da je on "bio" u Bosni i ucestvovao u zlocinu protiv Bosnjackog naroda.
14 Q. Now, during the summer of 1992, did you have an opportunity to see
15 a person known as Captain Dragan in Zvornik?
16 A. Yes, I did.
17 Q. How many times?
18 A. I saw him only once over there. There was an incident, and he was
19 involved in that incident.
20 Q. The incident that you're talking about, was it during the takeover
21 of the town or did it occur sometime after fighting had subsided in the
22 town?
23 A. It was sometime after the fighting in town had stopped.
24 Q. Can I ask you, in a sentence or two, to summarise the event that
25 you witnessed having to do with Captain Dragan.
Page 21034
1 A. One day, in the early evening, the local radio broadcast the news
2 that terrorists had entered the town of Zvornik. The citizens were
3 disturbed. We were sitting in Mali Zvornik, and we saw citizens looking
4 in the direction of Zvornik, and we could hear bursts of fire across the
5 Drina River. We went to the riverbank, and we saw soldiers going towards
6 a settlement downstream on both sides of the river and searching the
7 riverbanks.
8 Q. Did you see -- did there come a time when there was a man standing
9 next at the edge of the riverbank, a Muslim man?
10 A. Yes. I saw a man stepping into the river and hiding and going
11 upstream slowly. Above him was a kind of embankment. People were
12 shooting, and at one point the man was hit and he fell into the river. He
13 was hit by the group of soldiers that were searching the area.
14 Q. Were you able to tell whether that man was armed?
15 A. No. It was a man in civilian clothes. It wasn't far away, maybe
16 150 to 200 metres away from us. The citizens were saying that they saw
17 another man that was wounded but who managed to swim across the river to
18 Serbia.
19 I got into a car and went across the river, across the pedestrian
20 bridge, and there I came across the column of men searching the area.
21 There were between 60 and 80 of them. They were in -- had war paint on
22 their faces. In front of them was an open jeep with the driver and
23 Captain Dragan sitting to his right. I stopped the car and said, "Mister
24 --" or, "Captain, don't do any more nonsense. It would be best for you
25 to leave as soon as possible." He just looked at me. I got into the car
Page 21035
1 and left.
2 Q. Did there also come a time when you had a conversation with Aco
3 Sekanic regarding an exercise that Captain Dragan was using -- in which he
4 was using captured Muslim prisoners?
5 A. Yes. He said, "That crazy captain has come and he took three
6 captured Muslims and said that he would release them, but actually he's
7 training his soldiers using them." After that, there was a meeting at
8 which it was requested that he leave the municipality of Zvornik. He had
9 a similar such meeting with General Mladic.
Izvor: http://www.milosevic-trial.org/trial/2003-05-22.htm
Prijevod :
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Molim vas da nam u par rečenica ukratko
opišete događaj kojem ste bili očevidac, a koji se ticao kapetana Dragana.
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Jednog dana predveče, lokalni radio je
obavještavao da su upali teroristi u grad Zvornik, građani su bili uznemireni.
Mi smo sedeli u Malom Zvorniku i videli smo kako građani nešto gledaju
u pravcu Zvornika i čule su se rafalne paljbe preko Drine. Mi smo izašli na
obalu i videli kako vojska ide prema naseljenom mestu niz reku Drinu, sa
obadve strane puta i pretražuju pored Drine obalu.
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Da li ste u jednom trenutku videli čoveka kako
stoji na obali reke Drine, Muslimana?
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Da, ja sam video čoveka kako je zagazio u
Drinu i polako se krije, ide uz vodu. Iznad su bili... Bio je neki nadzidani,
zaštićena obala, ljudi su tamo pucali i u jednom momentu čovjek je pao u
Drinu, bio je pogođen od grupe vojske koja je pretraživala teren. Ja sam se
...
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Da li ste uspeli da vidite da li je taj čovek bio
naoružan?
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Ne, to je bio čovjek u civilu, to nije bilo
daleko, do 150 metara od nas, 200. Građani su pričali da su vidjeli još nekog
čovjeka da je ranjen, da je jedan preplivao, da je uspio da prepliva u Srbiju.
Ja sam se izdvojio, seo u kola i otišo na pešački most, prešao preko. Tamo
sam došao na kolonu koja je inače pretraživala teren. Bilo je negdje od 60
do 70, bili su potpuno maskirani ratnim bojama, napred, ispred je bio džip
otvoreni, vozač i sa desne strane sedeo Kapetan Dragan. Ja sam zaustavio
kola u neposrednoj blizini i rekao: “Gospodine kapetane, ove gluposti nemoj
da pravite ovde, biće dobro da što pre odavde odete”. On se zaustavio,
gledao, ja sam seo u kola i otišo nazad.
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Da li ste u jednom trenutku razgovarali sa
Acom Sekanićem o tome na koji način je Kapetan Dragan koristio zarobljene
muslimanske zatvorenike?
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Da, jesam, on je rekao: “Onaj ludi kapetan
došao i uzeo tri zarobljena Muslimana i rekao da će da ih oslobodi, a on na
njima obučava svoju vojsku”. I posle toga je bio sastanak na kom je traženo
da on napusti opštinu Zvornik. Jedan takav sastanak imao je i sa generalom
Mladićem.
Svi ovi dokazi su dostupni Australijskom Sudstvu i ono i dalje ne izvrsava obaveze prema Medjunarodnoj zajednici a to otvoreno kaze da Drzava Australija podrzava terorizam koji je usmjeren protiv Muslinana.
14 Q. Now, during the summer of 1992, did you have an opportunity to see
15 a person known as Captain Dragan in Zvornik?
16 A. Yes, I did.
17 Q. How many times?
18 A. I saw him only once over there. There was an incident, and he was
19 involved in that incident.
20 Q. The incident that you're talking about, was it during the takeover
21 of the town or did it occur sometime after fighting had subsided in the
22 town?
23 A. It was sometime after the fighting in town had stopped.
24 Q. Can I ask you, in a sentence or two, to summarise the event that
25 you witnessed having to do with Captain Dragan.
Page 21034
1 A. One day, in the early evening, the local radio broadcast the news
2 that terrorists had entered the town of Zvornik. The citizens were
3 disturbed. We were sitting in Mali Zvornik, and we saw citizens looking
4 in the direction of Zvornik, and we could hear bursts of fire across the
5 Drina River. We went to the riverbank, and we saw soldiers going towards
6 a settlement downstream on both sides of the river and searching the
7 riverbanks.
8 Q. Did you see -- did there come a time when there was a man standing
9 next at the edge of the riverbank, a Muslim man?
10 A. Yes. I saw a man stepping into the river and hiding and going
11 upstream slowly. Above him was a kind of embankment. People were
12 shooting, and at one point the man was hit and he fell into the river. He
13 was hit by the group of soldiers that were searching the area.
14 Q. Were you able to tell whether that man was armed?
15 A. No. It was a man in civilian clothes. It wasn't far away, maybe
16 150 to 200 metres away from us. The citizens were saying that they saw
17 another man that was wounded but who managed to swim across the river to
18 Serbia.
19 I got into a car and went across the river, across the pedestrian
20 bridge, and there I came across the column of men searching the area.
21 There were between 60 and 80 of them. They were in -- had war paint on
22 their faces. In front of them was an open jeep with the driver and
23 Captain Dragan sitting to his right. I stopped the car and said, "Mister
24 --" or, "Captain, don't do any more nonsense. It would be best for you
25 to leave as soon as possible." He just looked at me. I got into the car
Page 21035
1 and left.
2 Q. Did there also come a time when you had a conversation with Aco
3 Sekanic regarding an exercise that Captain Dragan was using -- in which he
4 was using captured Muslim prisoners?
5 A. Yes. He said, "That crazy captain has come and he took three
6 captured Muslims and said that he would release them, but actually he's
7 training his soldiers using them." After that, there was a meeting at
8 which it was requested that he leave the municipality of Zvornik. He had
9 a similar such meeting with General Mladic.
Izvor: http://www.milosevic-trial.org/trial/2003-05-22.htm
Prijevod :
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Molim vas da nam u par rečenica ukratko
opišete događaj kojem ste bili očevidac, a koji se ticao kapetana Dragana.
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Jednog dana predveče, lokalni radio je
obavještavao da su upali teroristi u grad Zvornik, građani su bili uznemireni.
Mi smo sedeli u Malom Zvorniku i videli smo kako građani nešto gledaju
u pravcu Zvornika i čule su se rafalne paljbe preko Drine. Mi smo izašli na
obalu i videli kako vojska ide prema naseljenom mestu niz reku Drinu, sa
obadve strane puta i pretražuju pored Drine obalu.
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Da li ste u jednom trenutku videli čoveka kako
stoji na obali reke Drine, Muslimana?
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Da, ja sam video čoveka kako je zagazio u
Drinu i polako se krije, ide uz vodu. Iznad su bili... Bio je neki nadzidani,
zaštićena obala, ljudi su tamo pucali i u jednom momentu čovjek je pao u
Drinu, bio je pogođen od grupe vojske koja je pretraživala teren. Ja sam se
...
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Da li ste uspeli da vidite da li je taj čovek bio
naoružan?
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Ne, to je bio čovjek u civilu, to nije bilo
daleko, do 150 metara od nas, 200. Građani su pričali da su vidjeli još nekog
čovjeka da je ranjen, da je jedan preplivao, da je uspio da prepliva u Srbiju.
Ja sam se izdvojio, seo u kola i otišo na pešački most, prešao preko. Tamo
sam došao na kolonu koja je inače pretraživala teren. Bilo je negdje od 60
do 70, bili su potpuno maskirani ratnim bojama, napred, ispred je bio džip
otvoreni, vozač i sa desne strane sedeo Kapetan Dragan. Ja sam zaustavio
kola u neposrednoj blizini i rekao: “Gospodine kapetane, ove gluposti nemoj
da pravite ovde, biće dobro da što pre odavde odete”. On se zaustavio,
gledao, ja sam seo u kola i otišo nazad.
TUŽILAC GRUM – PITANJE: Da li ste u jednom trenutku razgovarali sa
Acom Sekanićem o tome na koji način je Kapetan Dragan koristio zarobljene
muslimanske zatvorenike?
SVEDOK B-161 – ODGOVOR: Da, jesam, on je rekao: “Onaj ludi kapetan
došao i uzeo tri zarobljena Muslimana i rekao da će da ih oslobodi, a on na
njima obučava svoju vojsku”. I posle toga je bio sastanak na kom je traženo
da on napusti opštinu Zvornik. Jedan takav sastanak imao je i sa generalom
Mladićem.
Svi ovi dokazi su dostupni Australijskom Sudstvu i ono i dalje ne izvrsava obaveze prema Medjunarodnoj zajednici a to otvoreno kaze da Drzava Australija podrzava terorizam koji je usmjeren protiv Muslinana.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#110 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Australijski Vrhovni Sud je donio odluku da Australijske novine "The Australian" nisu oklevetale Dragana Vasiljkovica koji je od sitnog kriminalca "dogurao" do kandidata za Presednika "Velike Srbije" sto se kao sto vam je poznato nikad nije iventuiralo zahvaljujuci hrabrosti i pozrtvovanosti Hrvatskog i Bosnjackog naroda.
Za vrijeme sudjenja "kapetan Dragan" je drzao sudijama politicke govore gdje je velicao svoju hrabrosti i tradicionalno "Srpsko junastvo" za koje znate iz izvjestaja iz Haga.
Nakon sto je podijelio medalje, Vasiljkovic ce sada morati platiti troskove Novincke kuce "News Ltd" ,koji ce naravno biti "ogromni" uzimajuci u obzir da su svjedoci dovodjeni iz Hrvatske i BiH a i da je video-link koristen za sudski proces.
Ovo je pobjeda i Bosanke(Bosnjakinje) koja je svjedocila o teroru kojem je bila izlozena od strane ovog "ljudskog izroda" koji se sluzi civilizacijom strane zemlje(Australije) da brani zlocin svoje primitivne nacije u kojoj je on heroj i u kojoj se silovanje zove herojstvo.
Samo primitivan narod moze imati takvu spodobu za heroja!
Ovo je Pobjeda ne samo Australijske Novinske kuce,nego pobjeda Prvade i Slobode izvjestavanja i prezentovanja Istine.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5811749958
Za vrijeme sudjenja "kapetan Dragan" je drzao sudijama politicke govore gdje je velicao svoju hrabrosti i tradicionalno "Srpsko junastvo" za koje znate iz izvjestaja iz Haga.
Nakon sto je podijelio medalje, Vasiljkovic ce sada morati platiti troskove Novincke kuce "News Ltd" ,koji ce naravno biti "ogromni" uzimajuci u obzir da su svjedoci dovodjeni iz Hrvatske i BiH a i da je video-link koristen za sudski proces.
Ovo je pobjeda i Bosanke(Bosnjakinje) koja je svjedocila o teroru kojem je bila izlozena od strane ovog "ljudskog izroda" koji se sluzi civilizacijom strane zemlje(Australije) da brani zlocin svoje primitivne nacije u kojoj je on heroj i u kojoj se silovanje zove herojstvo.
Samo primitivan narod moze imati takvu spodobu za heroja!
Ovo je Pobjeda ne samo Australijske Novinske kuce,nego pobjeda Prvade i Slobode izvjestavanja i prezentovanja Istine.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5811749958
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#111 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
"The Australian" danas objavljuje da ce Vlada Australije da mu sudi za zlocine koje je pocinio u ime Velike Srbije nad narodima Republike Hrvatske i BiH.
"Veliko Srspki" junaci su postali glavna "lovina' po cijelom svijetu!
To je ona "lovina" ili "misevi" koje Nemanja Kusturica spominje u svom herojskom mitingaskom nastupu pred hrabrim Srbima koji su se sa "golorukim" grudima odupirali najjacaoj vojnoj Alijansi(NATO) i Uspesno je "pobedili"!
Evo novosti :
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5811909528
Vrhovni Sud Australije je donio odluku da je list "The Australian" istinito pisao da je Vasiljkovic Dragan:
1. Kriminalac koji se je od 19 godine u Australiji bavio kriminalom i sa svojim osudama za drzanje i posjedovanje ukradene robe i upravlajnje ilegalnom prostitucijom nosi titulu kriminalca.
2. Takodjer je istinita tvrdnja da je imao vezu sa "podzemljem"(kriminalnim organizacijama)!
Interesantono je primjetiti da je "Kapetan svih Srpskih kapetana" intervjuisao policajku za eventualnu prostituciju pa ga "uhvatilo".
Doduse ,on je na sudu tvrdio da se je bio zaljubio u neku "operatorku"(sex-a),pa da joj je pomagao da "vodi" posao!
Takodjer je dokazano da je ratni kriminalac koji je mucio,ubijao i silovao!
Novinska Kuca u Australiji dokazuje ratni kriminal!
U odluci suda najvise mi se dopada onaj dio gdje se nalaze civilnom i ratnom kriminalcu da plati sudske troskove Novinske Agencije:
Svaka cast "The Australian"!
"Veliko Srspki" junaci su postali glavna "lovina' po cijelom svijetu!
To je ona "lovina" ili "misevi" koje Nemanja Kusturica spominje u svom herojskom mitingaskom nastupu pred hrabrim Srbima koji su se sa "golorukim" grudima odupirali najjacaoj vojnoj Alijansi(NATO) i Uspesno je "pobedili"!
Evo novosti :
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 5811909528
Vrhovni Sud Australije je donio odluku da je list "The Australian" istinito pisao da je Vasiljkovic Dragan:
1. Kriminalac koji se je od 19 godine u Australiji bavio kriminalom i sa svojim osudama za drzanje i posjedovanje ukradene robe i upravlajnje ilegalnom prostitucijom nosi titulu kriminalca.
2. Takodjer je istinita tvrdnja da je imao vezu sa "podzemljem"(kriminalnim organizacijama)!
Interesantono je primjetiti da je "Kapetan svih Srpskih kapetana" intervjuisao policajku za eventualnu prostituciju pa ga "uhvatilo".
Doduse ,on je na sudu tvrdio da se je bio zaljubio u neku "operatorku"(sex-a),pa da joj je pomagao da "vodi" posao!
Takodjer je dokazano da je ratni kriminalac koji je mucio,ubijao i silovao!
Novinska Kuca u Australiji dokazuje ratni kriminal!
U odluci suda najvise mi se dopada onaj dio gdje se nalaze civilnom i ratnom kriminalcu da plati sudske troskove Novinske Agencije:
Svaka cast "The Australian"!
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#112 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Evo i cjelokupne sudske odluke,pa da vidite da se "Srpski misevi" sluze "zaobilazenjem istine" na "nebeski nacin"!
Nadam se da neko vodi racuna,pa da i meni nekakvu "medalju" za "pravne zasluge" nemjeri!
Nadam se da neko vodi racuna,pa da i meni nekakvu "medalju" za "pravne zasluge" nemjeri!
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#113 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Ovaj post je namijenjen Bosanskom Tuzilastvu(Sekciji za procesuiranje ratnih zlocina protiv civilnog stanovnistva):
U dokaznom postupku koji se je vodio u Australijskom Vrhovnom Sudu je dokazano da je ratni zlocinac Dragan Vasiljkovic izvrsio nasilno i brutalno silovanje Bosanke(Bosnjakinje) koja je bila zatocena i izlocena mentalnoj i fizickoj torturi od strane Vasiljkovic Dragana i drugih.
Mole se svi oni koji imaju mogucnost da uticu na sudske organe BiH,da izvrse svoju gradjansku duznost i da se omoguci da Drzava BiH procesuira ovog ratnog kriminalaca za pocinjeni zlocin protiv Bosanskog naroda(Bosnjaka i Hrvata).
Bosnjakinja je navedena kao "Source A".
The evidence relied upon to establish that the plaintiff condoned the rape of women, participated in the organised rape of women and that the plaintiff raped a woman (14, 15 and 16).
130 Source A was taken prisoner by Serb paramilitary forces on 1 May 1992. After about a month of detention in a place called Liplje, Source A was taken to a brick factory in Zvornik. She was imprisoned in a room about 3m by 4m, which held up to about 15 women. The guards at this prison wore military camouflage uniforms with red berets.
131 One evening, two guards took Source A and other women in a jeep to the Hotel Vidikovac in Zvornik. The men took Source A to one of the rooms and told her to wait for "the prince". The plaintiff entered the room and asked her why she had not removed her clothing. She was ordered to do so and she obeyed. The plaintiff removed his trousers and raped her. Source A was taken to the same hotel on five or six occasions after that night. On at least four of those occasions the plaintiff raped her.
132 On the last occasion that Source A was taken to the hotel, the plaintiff entered the room and told her that he would do nothing that night but that "his friends will do it". The plaintiff remained in the room while Source A was raped by a soldier wearing a camouflage uniform with a green beret, but the plaintiff left before another two or three man raped her. These soldiers were described by Source A as “Kninjas”, acknowledged by the plaintiff to be the Serbian paramilitary soldiers from the fortress at Knin.
133 The plaintiff's evidence was that he visited Zvornik on two occasions, first in late May 1992 and secondly on 7 June 1992. He claimed to have been wearing civilian clothes on both occasions. These assertions are suspect in view of the findings I have made concerning the plaintiff’s credit generally.
134 The plaintiff's claim that his first trip to Zvornik was to set up a branch of the Captain Dragan fund was not entirely supported by the evidence of his brother, who said that the plaintiff's trip to Zvornik at this time was in furtherance of the establishment of a paramilitary training camp. The plaintiff further acknowledged that he had visited the Hotel Viidikovac in Zvornik on one or more occasions in the period from May to July 1992 (see Exhibit 11).
135 The plaintiff’s presence at Zvornik and at the hotel in the time frame nominated by Source A tends to confirm her evidence, notwithstanding the plaintiff’s denial of these allegations. I am mindful of the serious nature of these allegations, but once it is accepted that Source A has correctly identified the plaintiff as the person who raped her, there is little, if any scope to doubt the substantial truth of imputations 14, 15 and 16.
U dokaznom postupku koji se je vodio u Australijskom Vrhovnom Sudu je dokazano da je ratni zlocinac Dragan Vasiljkovic izvrsio nasilno i brutalno silovanje Bosanke(Bosnjakinje) koja je bila zatocena i izlocena mentalnoj i fizickoj torturi od strane Vasiljkovic Dragana i drugih.
Mole se svi oni koji imaju mogucnost da uticu na sudske organe BiH,da izvrse svoju gradjansku duznost i da se omoguci da Drzava BiH procesuira ovog ratnog kriminalaca za pocinjeni zlocin protiv Bosanskog naroda(Bosnjaka i Hrvata).
Bosnjakinja je navedena kao "Source A".
The evidence relied upon to establish that the plaintiff condoned the rape of women, participated in the organised rape of women and that the plaintiff raped a woman (14, 15 and 16).
130 Source A was taken prisoner by Serb paramilitary forces on 1 May 1992. After about a month of detention in a place called Liplje, Source A was taken to a brick factory in Zvornik. She was imprisoned in a room about 3m by 4m, which held up to about 15 women. The guards at this prison wore military camouflage uniforms with red berets.
131 One evening, two guards took Source A and other women in a jeep to the Hotel Vidikovac in Zvornik. The men took Source A to one of the rooms and told her to wait for "the prince". The plaintiff entered the room and asked her why she had not removed her clothing. She was ordered to do so and she obeyed. The plaintiff removed his trousers and raped her. Source A was taken to the same hotel on five or six occasions after that night. On at least four of those occasions the plaintiff raped her.
132 On the last occasion that Source A was taken to the hotel, the plaintiff entered the room and told her that he would do nothing that night but that "his friends will do it". The plaintiff remained in the room while Source A was raped by a soldier wearing a camouflage uniform with a green beret, but the plaintiff left before another two or three man raped her. These soldiers were described by Source A as “Kninjas”, acknowledged by the plaintiff to be the Serbian paramilitary soldiers from the fortress at Knin.
133 The plaintiff's evidence was that he visited Zvornik on two occasions, first in late May 1992 and secondly on 7 June 1992. He claimed to have been wearing civilian clothes on both occasions. These assertions are suspect in view of the findings I have made concerning the plaintiff’s credit generally.
134 The plaintiff's claim that his first trip to Zvornik was to set up a branch of the Captain Dragan fund was not entirely supported by the evidence of his brother, who said that the plaintiff's trip to Zvornik at this time was in furtherance of the establishment of a paramilitary training camp. The plaintiff further acknowledged that he had visited the Hotel Viidikovac in Zvornik on one or more occasions in the period from May to July 1992 (see Exhibit 11).
135 The plaintiff’s presence at Zvornik and at the hotel in the time frame nominated by Source A tends to confirm her evidence, notwithstanding the plaintiff’s denial of these allegations. I am mindful of the serious nature of these allegations, but once it is accepted that Source A has correctly identified the plaintiff as the person who raped her, there is little, if any scope to doubt the substantial truth of imputations 14, 15 and 16.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#114 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
U presudi Australijskog vrhovnog Suda je dokazano da je Australijski Drzavljanin Vasiljkovic Dragan bio placenik po Australijskim zakonima a u skladu sa konvencijama UN i drugim Odredbama Medjunarodnog Prava.
Sud je obrazlozio da je po Australijskim zakonima Vasiljkovic Dragan ilegalno,udruzen sa drugim licima nasilnim i terorsitickim metodama vodio Oruzanu borbu protiv Republike Hrvatske koja je u to vrijeme bila suverena drzava i priznata od strane Australije.
Sud je dalje rekao da takozvana Republika krajina nije imala odlike suverene drzave jer nikad nije prije postojala i da je kao takva bila ilegalna i teroristicka tvorevina.
Sud nije imao obavezu da obrazlaze da je Vasiljkovic Dragan terorista,sto je on po definiciji Zakona SFRJ o terorizmu i njenih Drzava naslijednica(Republika Hrvatska,BiH i dr.).
Sud dalje obrazlaze da su svi oni koji u oruzanoj teroristickoj borbi protiv republike Hrvatske u takozvanim Oruzanim Snagama takozvane Republike Krajine, placenici i ilegalni teroristi,sto olaksava Hrvatskom tuzilastvu da u buducim postupcima lakse procesuira osumnjicene ratne zlocince i teroriste koji sada zive na teritoriji Australije i imaju Australijsko Drzavljanstvo.
Ovaj Sudski postupak je vazan i za BiH, gdje se iz Sudskog procesa o definiranju statusa lica koja su udruzeno djelovala protiv legalnog sistema BiH i protiv njenih gradjana,i da su njihove aktivnosti ilegalne i teroristicke i primjeniti zakone i akte protiv svih tih lica.
Za Drzavu BiH i njeno Drzavno Rukovodstvo je sramota da druga Drzava(Australija) proglasi nekog placenikom i teroristom za zlocinacka djela na teritoriji druge drzave(BiH),a ta drzava jos nije zapocela ni istrazen radnje protiv tog zlocinaca.
Teroristi i kriminalcu,Vasiljkovic Draganu treba suditi u Sarajevu,za zlocine protiv Bosnjackog i Hrvatskog naroda i Sistema Legitimne Bosanske Drzave.
The evidence relied upon to establish that the plaintiff, an Australian citizen, went to a foreign State and engaged in hostile activity in that foreign State, which is contrary to Australian law (7).
83 The Australian law of which the plaintiff was, according to this imputation, in breach is s 6 of the Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978 (Cth) (Foreign Incursions Act) as it stood in 1991. That section then provided :-
(1) A person shall not :
(a) enter a foreign State with intent to engage in a hostile activity in that foreign State; or
(b) engage in a hostile activity in a foreign State.
(2) A person shall not be taken to have committed an offence against this section unless ;
(a) at the time of the doing of the act that is alleged to constitute the offence, the person
(i) was an Australian citizen or
(ii) not being an Australian citizen, was ordinarily resident in Australia or
(b) the person was present in Australia at any time during the period of one year immediately preceding the doing of that act and, at any time when the person was so present, his or her presence was for a purpose connected with that act, or for purposes that included such a purpose.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), engaging in a hostile activity in a foreign State consists of doing an act for the purpose of achieving any one or more of the following objectives (whether or not such an objective is achieved) :
(a) the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the foreign State or of a part of the foreign State
(aa) engaging in armed hostilities in the foreign State
(b) causing by force or violence the public in the foreign State to be in fear of suffering death or personal injury
(c) causing the death of, or bodily injury to, a person who:
(i) is the head of state of the foreign State or
(ii) holds, or performs any of the duties of, a public office of the foreign State or of a part of the foreign State or
(d) unlawfully destroying or damaging any real or personal property belonging to the government of the foreign State or of a part of the foreign State.
(4) Nothing in this section applies to an act done by a person in the course of, and as part of, the person's service in any capacity in or with:
(a) the armed forces of the government of a foreign State
.............................................................................
84 A foreign State is defined (s 3) as an independent sovereign state or an area of land (whether or not it is self-governing) that is not part of an independent sovereign state. Government is defined as the authority exercising effective governmental control in that foreign State or that part of that foreign State. Armed force is not defined otherwise than to exclude the Defence Force of Australia.
85 The evidence established that, at the relevant time, the plaintiff held dual Australian and Serbian citizenship. Between 1976 and 1981, the plaintiff served with the Australian army reserve. In about 1986 the plaintiff left Australia and arrived in the former Yugoslavia. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff went to Texas in the USA and spent three years enrolled in an aviation academy. In about 1990 he returned to Yugoslavia and went to Krajina.
86 Since late 1990, Krajina was considered by the Serb population as a Serbian Autonomous District, although it was part of the Republic of Croatia. It included the towns of Glina and Knin. On 16 May 1991, the Krajina Assembly declared Krajina part of the Republic of Serbia, at about the same time that Croatia was attempting to secede from the former Yugoslavia. (Croatia did not become independent of Yugoslavia until October 1991.) However, this declaration was not recognised by Serbia at the time. On 29 May 1991, the Krajina Assembly established its own government. It passed the Consitutional Law of the Serbian Autonomous District of Krajina, which defined the District as part of the federated Yugoslavia. On 19 December 1991, the Krajina Autonomous District became the Republic of Serbian Krajina. A Consitution was passed, defining the Republic of Serbian Krajina as a national state of the Serbian people and of all citizens residing therein. (Exhibit 2, pp 44 - 54)
87 The plaintiff’s evidence was that he initially enlisted as a reservist in the Krajina police force and received a commission as Captain on 4 April 1991. He remained in that position until 1 August 1991. The plaintiff then served in the Krajina army between 20 January 1993 and early 1994.
88 It was a pervasive theme of the plaintiff’s evidence that he was serving as a police officer in the first half of the war and only became a member of the armed forces during the second half of the war. However, it became clear in the course of cross-examination that, in answer to interrogatories issued by the defendant, the plaintiff had responded that he was a member of the Krajina Armed Forces between April 1991 and 2 August 1991, holding the rank of Captain, and was the "commander of approximately 21 soldiers, all wearing uniform insignia and carrying arms, openly engaged in reconnaissance and search and destroy and instructor of basic military training." (Exhibit 13) Ultimately, the plaintiff’s counsel disavowed any reliance upon the distinction sought to be maintained by his client.
89 On 1 May 1991, the plaintiff was transferred to the fortress at Knin. He wore camouflage uniform with a camouflage beret and bore three stars on his lapels. He was one of six captains. There were also six lieutenants and 54 second lieutenants at the fortress, all 66 of whom were under the plaintiff's command.
90 The plaintiff gave extensive evidence of his role in the battle of Glina in July 1991. According to the plaintiff, he was in command of 22 members of the Krajina police force and was authorised by the Minister of the Interior, stationed in Knin, to attack the Croat forces. This was, according to the plaintiff, the first time he engaged in armed conflict as opposed to training those under his command in the use of weapons. This battle, together with other attacks on predominantly Croat towns and villages in 1991, was aimed at uniting Serbian territories.
91 Thus, there does not appear to be any dispute that the plaintiff, an Australian citizen (s 6(2)(a)(i)), in July 1991, engaged in hostile activity (s 6(3)(aa) and (b)) in a foreign State, namely the former Yugoslavia. The salient question is ; was the plaintiff serving in any capacity with the armed forces of the government of a foreign State (s 6(4)). The answer to that question depends in turn upon the status of the Krajina Autonomous District in July 1991. In order to qualify as a foreign State, it must have been either an independent sovereign state, or an area of land that was not part of an independent sovereign state.
Sud je obrazlozio da je po Australijskim zakonima Vasiljkovic Dragan ilegalno,udruzen sa drugim licima nasilnim i terorsitickim metodama vodio Oruzanu borbu protiv Republike Hrvatske koja je u to vrijeme bila suverena drzava i priznata od strane Australije.
Sud je dalje rekao da takozvana Republika krajina nije imala odlike suverene drzave jer nikad nije prije postojala i da je kao takva bila ilegalna i teroristicka tvorevina.
Sud nije imao obavezu da obrazlaze da je Vasiljkovic Dragan terorista,sto je on po definiciji Zakona SFRJ o terorizmu i njenih Drzava naslijednica(Republika Hrvatska,BiH i dr.).
Sud dalje obrazlaze da su svi oni koji u oruzanoj teroristickoj borbi protiv republike Hrvatske u takozvanim Oruzanim Snagama takozvane Republike Krajine, placenici i ilegalni teroristi,sto olaksava Hrvatskom tuzilastvu da u buducim postupcima lakse procesuira osumnjicene ratne zlocince i teroriste koji sada zive na teritoriji Australije i imaju Australijsko Drzavljanstvo.
Ovaj Sudski postupak je vazan i za BiH, gdje se iz Sudskog procesa o definiranju statusa lica koja su udruzeno djelovala protiv legalnog sistema BiH i protiv njenih gradjana,i da su njihove aktivnosti ilegalne i teroristicke i primjeniti zakone i akte protiv svih tih lica.
Za Drzavu BiH i njeno Drzavno Rukovodstvo je sramota da druga Drzava(Australija) proglasi nekog placenikom i teroristom za zlocinacka djela na teritoriji druge drzave(BiH),a ta drzava jos nije zapocela ni istrazen radnje protiv tog zlocinaca.
Teroristi i kriminalcu,Vasiljkovic Draganu treba suditi u Sarajevu,za zlocine protiv Bosnjackog i Hrvatskog naroda i Sistema Legitimne Bosanske Drzave.
The evidence relied upon to establish that the plaintiff, an Australian citizen, went to a foreign State and engaged in hostile activity in that foreign State, which is contrary to Australian law (7).
83 The Australian law of which the plaintiff was, according to this imputation, in breach is s 6 of the Crimes (Foreign Incursions and Recruitment) Act 1978 (Cth) (Foreign Incursions Act) as it stood in 1991. That section then provided :-
(1) A person shall not :
(a) enter a foreign State with intent to engage in a hostile activity in that foreign State; or
(b) engage in a hostile activity in a foreign State.
(2) A person shall not be taken to have committed an offence against this section unless ;
(a) at the time of the doing of the act that is alleged to constitute the offence, the person
(i) was an Australian citizen or
(ii) not being an Australian citizen, was ordinarily resident in Australia or
(b) the person was present in Australia at any time during the period of one year immediately preceding the doing of that act and, at any time when the person was so present, his or her presence was for a purpose connected with that act, or for purposes that included such a purpose.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), engaging in a hostile activity in a foreign State consists of doing an act for the purpose of achieving any one or more of the following objectives (whether or not such an objective is achieved) :
(a) the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the foreign State or of a part of the foreign State
(aa) engaging in armed hostilities in the foreign State
(b) causing by force or violence the public in the foreign State to be in fear of suffering death or personal injury
(c) causing the death of, or bodily injury to, a person who:
(i) is the head of state of the foreign State or
(ii) holds, or performs any of the duties of, a public office of the foreign State or of a part of the foreign State or
(d) unlawfully destroying or damaging any real or personal property belonging to the government of the foreign State or of a part of the foreign State.
(4) Nothing in this section applies to an act done by a person in the course of, and as part of, the person's service in any capacity in or with:
(a) the armed forces of the government of a foreign State
.............................................................................
84 A foreign State is defined (s 3) as an independent sovereign state or an area of land (whether or not it is self-governing) that is not part of an independent sovereign state. Government is defined as the authority exercising effective governmental control in that foreign State or that part of that foreign State. Armed force is not defined otherwise than to exclude the Defence Force of Australia.
85 The evidence established that, at the relevant time, the plaintiff held dual Australian and Serbian citizenship. Between 1976 and 1981, the plaintiff served with the Australian army reserve. In about 1986 the plaintiff left Australia and arrived in the former Yugoslavia. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff went to Texas in the USA and spent three years enrolled in an aviation academy. In about 1990 he returned to Yugoslavia and went to Krajina.
86 Since late 1990, Krajina was considered by the Serb population as a Serbian Autonomous District, although it was part of the Republic of Croatia. It included the towns of Glina and Knin. On 16 May 1991, the Krajina Assembly declared Krajina part of the Republic of Serbia, at about the same time that Croatia was attempting to secede from the former Yugoslavia. (Croatia did not become independent of Yugoslavia until October 1991.) However, this declaration was not recognised by Serbia at the time. On 29 May 1991, the Krajina Assembly established its own government. It passed the Consitutional Law of the Serbian Autonomous District of Krajina, which defined the District as part of the federated Yugoslavia. On 19 December 1991, the Krajina Autonomous District became the Republic of Serbian Krajina. A Consitution was passed, defining the Republic of Serbian Krajina as a national state of the Serbian people and of all citizens residing therein. (Exhibit 2, pp 44 - 54)
87 The plaintiff’s evidence was that he initially enlisted as a reservist in the Krajina police force and received a commission as Captain on 4 April 1991. He remained in that position until 1 August 1991. The plaintiff then served in the Krajina army between 20 January 1993 and early 1994.
88 It was a pervasive theme of the plaintiff’s evidence that he was serving as a police officer in the first half of the war and only became a member of the armed forces during the second half of the war. However, it became clear in the course of cross-examination that, in answer to interrogatories issued by the defendant, the plaintiff had responded that he was a member of the Krajina Armed Forces between April 1991 and 2 August 1991, holding the rank of Captain, and was the "commander of approximately 21 soldiers, all wearing uniform insignia and carrying arms, openly engaged in reconnaissance and search and destroy and instructor of basic military training." (Exhibit 13) Ultimately, the plaintiff’s counsel disavowed any reliance upon the distinction sought to be maintained by his client.
89 On 1 May 1991, the plaintiff was transferred to the fortress at Knin. He wore camouflage uniform with a camouflage beret and bore three stars on his lapels. He was one of six captains. There were also six lieutenants and 54 second lieutenants at the fortress, all 66 of whom were under the plaintiff's command.
90 The plaintiff gave extensive evidence of his role in the battle of Glina in July 1991. According to the plaintiff, he was in command of 22 members of the Krajina police force and was authorised by the Minister of the Interior, stationed in Knin, to attack the Croat forces. This was, according to the plaintiff, the first time he engaged in armed conflict as opposed to training those under his command in the use of weapons. This battle, together with other attacks on predominantly Croat towns and villages in 1991, was aimed at uniting Serbian territories.
91 Thus, there does not appear to be any dispute that the plaintiff, an Australian citizen (s 6(2)(a)(i)), in July 1991, engaged in hostile activity (s 6(3)(aa) and (b)) in a foreign State, namely the former Yugoslavia. The salient question is ; was the plaintiff serving in any capacity with the armed forces of the government of a foreign State (s 6(4)). The answer to that question depends in turn upon the status of the Krajina Autonomous District in July 1991. In order to qualify as a foreign State, it must have been either an independent sovereign state, or an area of land that was not part of an independent sovereign state.
-
Sandarz
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 07/10/2009 15:50
#115 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Definicija plaćenika prema Ženevskim konvencijama je da mora primati više novaca za svoj ratni angažman od lokalnih boraca.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#116 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Definicija plaćenika po UN:
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/44/a44r034.htm
1. A mercenary is any person who:
(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an
armed conflict;
(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the
desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party
to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that
promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed
forces of that party;
(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of
territory controlled by a party to the conflict;
(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and
(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on
official duty as a member of its armed forces.
2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:
(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of
participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:
(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the
constitutional order of a State; or
(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;
(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for
significant private gain and is prompted by the promise or payment of material
compensation;
(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such
an act is directed;
(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and
(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory
the act is undertaken.
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/44/a44r034.htm
1. A mercenary is any person who:
(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an
armed conflict;
(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the
desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party
to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that
promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed
forces of that party;
(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of
territory controlled by a party to the conflict;
(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and
(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on
official duty as a member of its armed forces.
2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:
(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of
participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:
(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the
constitutional order of a State; or
(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;
(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for
significant private gain and is prompted by the promise or payment of material
compensation;
(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such
an act is directed;
(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and
(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory
the act is undertaken.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#117 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Po tvojoj definiciji(pardon:Zenevskim konvencijama) Osama Bin Laden nije ni placenik a ni terorista jer je za njegov "angazman" koristio svoj novac a imao ga je daleko vise nego svi "lokalni borci"(Talibani).Sandarz wrote:Definicija plaćenika prema Ženevskim konvencijama je da mora primati više novaca za svoj ratni angažman od lokalnih boraca.
Last edited by livingstone on 24/12/2009 11:22, edited 1 time in total.
-
Sandarz
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 07/10/2009 15:50
#118 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
livingstone wrote:Po tvojoj definiciji(pardon:Zenevskim konvecijama) Osama Bin Laden nije ni placenik a ni terorista jer je za njegov "angazman" koristio svoj novac a imao ga je daleko vise nego svi "lokalni borci"(Talibani).Sandarz wrote:Definicija plaćenika prema Ženevskim konvencijama je da mora primati više novaca za svoj ratni angažman od lokalnih boraca.
Pa i nije.
Nisam ni čuo da netko tvrdi kako je on plaćenik. Prije mi se čini da je odgovarajući izraz za njega fanatik.
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#119 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Djelimicno si u pravu:Sandarz wrote:livingstone wrote:Po tvojoj definiciji(pardon:Zenevskim konvecijama) Osama Bin Laden nije ni placenik a ni terorista jer je za njegov "angazman" koristio svoj novac a imao ga je daleko vise nego svi "lokalni borci"(Talibani).Sandarz wrote:Definicija plaćenika prema Ženevskim konvencijama je da mora primati više novaca za svoj ratni angažman od lokalnih boraca.
Pa i nije.
Nisam ni čuo da netko tvrdi kako je on plaćenik. Prije mi se čini da je odgovarajući izraz za njega fanatik.
Ta odrednica u njegovom slucaju nije koristena iz prakticnih razloga ali uzimajuci u obzir da on prima "Bozju nagradu" za svoje aktivnosti a primjenjujuci tvoju definiciju u kojoj se kaze da on mora primati vise "nagrade"(para) od drugih,on je zasigurno "placenik" jer njega Alah u svakom slucaju nagradjuje vise nego druge.
Da nije tako,on bi bio u zatvoru!
-
Fair Life
- Posts: 14219
- Joined: 02/03/2004 00:00
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#121 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Kapetan "Pimp":
Kako je ono govorio: "Ako vam kazem ko sam,morat' cu vas ubiti!"
A sutkinja,Megan Latham u svom obrazlozenju je naglasila,da su se svi svjedoci slozili u opisu da Vasiljkovic Dragan ima "velik nos"!
Veliki ratnik(Alpha male) -treba puno kiseonika , pa stoga velike nozdrve sa brzo "snabdevanje" kiseonikom u "specijalnim akcijama".
U glupostima,niko Srbe ne moze da premasi!
Alal im vera!
Samo me cudi da je i novinar Sergije Princip istih "parametara"(pogolem nos) a niti je "Alpha male" a niti "specijalac".
Cetnik-pocetnik!
Kako je ono govorio: "Ako vam kazem ko sam,morat' cu vas ubiti!"
A sutkinja,Megan Latham u svom obrazlozenju je naglasila,da su se svi svjedoci slozili u opisu da Vasiljkovic Dragan ima "velik nos"!
Veliki ratnik(Alpha male) -treba puno kiseonika , pa stoga velike nozdrve sa brzo "snabdevanje" kiseonikom u "specijalnim akcijama".
U glupostima,niko Srbe ne moze da premasi!
Alal im vera!
Samo me cudi da je i novinar Sergije Princip istih "parametara"(pogolem nos) a niti je "Alpha male" a niti "specijalac".
Cetnik-pocetnik!
-
kiky
- Posts: 4725
- Joined: 13/02/2008 13:20
#122 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
meni se čini da če ipak bit isporučen hrvatskoj ...
-
mO k3
- Posts: 34082
- Joined: 23/09/2009 14:16
- Location: https://youtu.be/xk7QKTXQGbg
#123 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
trebal bi....kiky wrote:meni se čini da če ipak bit isporučen hrvatskoj ...
-
livingstone
- Posts: 227
- Joined: 08/08/2009 15:38
#124 Re: Za sada:Kapetan Dragan(Dragan Vasiljkovic) ne ide u Hrvatsku
Da je "Srbadija" u rasejanju nezadovoljna sa Demokracijom u "Celom Svetu" pokazuje i pismo is Australije.
Velika "vrucina" im udarila u glavu:
GENERALNI SEKRETARIJAT
PREDSEDNIKA REPUBLIKE
Andrićev venac 1
11000 Beograd, Srbija
Na ruke Predsednika Republike Srbije
G-dina Borisa TADICA
e-mail: [email protected]
Postovani Gospodine Predsednice!
Pozivajuci se na Vasu nedavnu izjavu o inicijativi o pokretanju i usvajanju rezolucije o Srebrenici dozvolite da Vam s tim u vezi prenesemo otvoreno neslaganje i javno negodovanje srpske dijaspore Australije.
Srpska dijaspora kao integralni deo srpskog nacionalnog bica ne sme, ne moze i nece se sloziti ni sa cijom i ni sa kakvom olakom i proizvoljnom kvalifikacijom koja bi imala za cilj svrstavanje ili okarakterizovanje srpskog naroda kao genocidnog. Kao sto Vam je vrlo dobro poznato pitanje Srebrenice ima vise dimenzija gde, po svemu sudeci politicka dimenzija prednjaci. Upravo bi rezolucija o Srebrenici, u uslovima medijske i svake druge kampanje protiv srpskog naroda, bila de facto, ako ne i de jure priznanje da je srpski narod zaista pocinio genocid.
Srbi, ma gde zveli, ne treba da precutkuju zlocine ko god da ih je pocinio. S tim u vezi, Srbi Australije ne zele da se zlocin i zlocinci iz Srebrenice (i oko Srebrenice) precute i prikriju, vec naprotiv da se utvrdi prava istina o Strebrenici. U zadnjih dvadesetak godina svedoci smo opste satanizacije Srba pa je stoga preko potrebno da se u javnost izadje sa egzaktnim cinjenicama.
U to ime zelimo da Vi gospodine Predsednice umesto usvajanja rezolucije o Srebrenici koja kako ste sami naveli ne bi uzivala vecinsku podrsku gradjana Srbije, a jos manju podrsku vaskolikog srpskog naroda kako u Srbiji i regionu, tako i u rasejanjju, formirate telo od od eminentnih i priznatih strucnjaka i eksperata (domacih i stranih) koje bi imalo za cilj principijelno i merodavno istrazivanje svih relevantnih cinjenica i prikupljanje materijalnih dokaza kako bi se konacno saznala prava istina o Srebrenici, i ne samo o Srebrenici vec i svim drugim lokacijama na podrucju nekadasnje Jugoslavije gde se zna ili se osnovano sumnja da je zlocin pocinjen – ko god da ga je pocinio. Koliko nam je poznato o Srebrenici, tu se licitira se proizvoljnom i nikada do sada dokazanom brojkom od 8.000 zrtava. S druge strane imamo osporavanja i to ne samo od predstavnika srpskog naroda. Spomenimo samo neke eminentne licnosti kao sto su prof Chomski, Xonstone, Hermane i dr.
Gospodine Predsednice, Vi nemate mandat naroda koji Vas je izabrao ili koji u Vas gleda kao prevodnika vascele nacije da potpisujete rezoluciju o Srebrenici, ali imate mandat i obavezu, smemo se usuditi da kazemo i istorijsku odgovornost, da se borite i izborite za istinu. Samo istina, ma kakva ona bila, moze doneti mirno i trajno resenje za sve narode napacenog Balkana. Sav pravdoljubiv svet ce Vas podrzati u tome.
S duznim postovanjem!
U Sidneju, 24. januara 2010. god.
SRBI ZA PRAVDU I DEMOKRATIJU – A U S T R A L I J A
Sasa MILANOVIC dipl. prav Tihomir NOVAKOVIC dipl. prav Dr. Vojislav ILIC
PREDSEDNIK POTPREDSEDNIK POTPREDSEDNIK
Velika "vrucina" im udarila u glavu:
GENERALNI SEKRETARIJAT
PREDSEDNIKA REPUBLIKE
Andrićev venac 1
11000 Beograd, Srbija
Na ruke Predsednika Republike Srbije
G-dina Borisa TADICA
e-mail: [email protected]
Postovani Gospodine Predsednice!
Pozivajuci se na Vasu nedavnu izjavu o inicijativi o pokretanju i usvajanju rezolucije o Srebrenici dozvolite da Vam s tim u vezi prenesemo otvoreno neslaganje i javno negodovanje srpske dijaspore Australije.
Srpska dijaspora kao integralni deo srpskog nacionalnog bica ne sme, ne moze i nece se sloziti ni sa cijom i ni sa kakvom olakom i proizvoljnom kvalifikacijom koja bi imala za cilj svrstavanje ili okarakterizovanje srpskog naroda kao genocidnog. Kao sto Vam je vrlo dobro poznato pitanje Srebrenice ima vise dimenzija gde, po svemu sudeci politicka dimenzija prednjaci. Upravo bi rezolucija o Srebrenici, u uslovima medijske i svake druge kampanje protiv srpskog naroda, bila de facto, ako ne i de jure priznanje da je srpski narod zaista pocinio genocid.
Srbi, ma gde zveli, ne treba da precutkuju zlocine ko god da ih je pocinio. S tim u vezi, Srbi Australije ne zele da se zlocin i zlocinci iz Srebrenice (i oko Srebrenice) precute i prikriju, vec naprotiv da se utvrdi prava istina o Strebrenici. U zadnjih dvadesetak godina svedoci smo opste satanizacije Srba pa je stoga preko potrebno da se u javnost izadje sa egzaktnim cinjenicama.
U to ime zelimo da Vi gospodine Predsednice umesto usvajanja rezolucije o Srebrenici koja kako ste sami naveli ne bi uzivala vecinsku podrsku gradjana Srbije, a jos manju podrsku vaskolikog srpskog naroda kako u Srbiji i regionu, tako i u rasejanjju, formirate telo od od eminentnih i priznatih strucnjaka i eksperata (domacih i stranih) koje bi imalo za cilj principijelno i merodavno istrazivanje svih relevantnih cinjenica i prikupljanje materijalnih dokaza kako bi se konacno saznala prava istina o Srebrenici, i ne samo o Srebrenici vec i svim drugim lokacijama na podrucju nekadasnje Jugoslavije gde se zna ili se osnovano sumnja da je zlocin pocinjen – ko god da ga je pocinio. Koliko nam je poznato o Srebrenici, tu se licitira se proizvoljnom i nikada do sada dokazanom brojkom od 8.000 zrtava. S druge strane imamo osporavanja i to ne samo od predstavnika srpskog naroda. Spomenimo samo neke eminentne licnosti kao sto su prof Chomski, Xonstone, Hermane i dr.
Gospodine Predsednice, Vi nemate mandat naroda koji Vas je izabrao ili koji u Vas gleda kao prevodnika vascele nacije da potpisujete rezoluciju o Srebrenici, ali imate mandat i obavezu, smemo se usuditi da kazemo i istorijsku odgovornost, da se borite i izborite za istinu. Samo istina, ma kakva ona bila, moze doneti mirno i trajno resenje za sve narode napacenog Balkana. Sav pravdoljubiv svet ce Vas podrzati u tome.
S duznim postovanjem!
U Sidneju, 24. januara 2010. god.
SRBI ZA PRAVDU I DEMOKRATIJU – A U S T R A L I J A
Sasa MILANOVIC dipl. prav Tihomir NOVAKOVIC dipl. prav Dr. Vojislav ILIC
PREDSEDNIK POTPREDSEDNIK POTPREDSEDNIK
-
Fair Life
- Posts: 14219
- Joined: 02/03/2004 00:00