IRAN
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#69851 Re: IRAN
Ako I kad krene, nece iranci znati sta ih je snaslo. Vec vidjeno
- skrbavi-admin
- Posts: 6833
- Joined: 31/12/2021 17:16
- Location: Pakšobistan Wolfuckosia
#69852 Re: IRAN
a evo doso je i vjerovatno mosadov isprdak
- Qler
- Posts: 25668
- Joined: 18/10/2004 14:49
- Location: Sarajevo
#69853 Re: IRAN
Vidjet ćemo ko neće znati sta ga je snašlo.
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#69854 Re: IRAN
Pa vidjecemo, lako je tudjim mlatit slazem se.
Ali ovo je vec vidjeno. Prvi nalet, a dalje i kasnije sta ce se odvijati to niko ne zna.
Last edited by sumirprimus on 02/04/2026 21:43, edited 1 time in total.
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#69855 Re: IRAN
Ponasaj se sunce ti, nisi na kamiondzijskom parkingu
- Qler
- Posts: 25668
- Joined: 18/10/2004 14:49
- Location: Sarajevo
#69856 Re: IRAN
Tako su govorili Ameri i za Vijetnam, dok si tamo dok si vamo.. i za Afganistan i Irak, i gdje su sad, i Srbija je govorila rat u BiH za 7 dana gotov, i Rusi za Ukrajinu... Iran je jači od svih navedenih, i teži geografski... pa vidjet ćemo...
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#69857 Re: IRAN
Citaj, prvi nalet.
Sta ce bit za mjesec to je druga prica, kako je krenulo mozda I u europi zarati
- GungodessMissFortune
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 27/05/2025 07:12
#69858 Re: IRAN
Osim mrtvih, ništa se strašno nece dogoditi u smislu smaka svijeta. Tek onda če se vidjeti da nuklearno oružje nije ono što se misli da jeste a to je da je oružje koje završava sukobe.Dozer wrote: ↑02/04/2026 20:44Sta tacno nije sto se misli?GungodessMissFortune wrote: ↑02/04/2026 20:31 Da hoće više neko bacit tu nuklearku pa da onda tek vidite da to nije ono što se misli da jest. Mislim helouuu.
TN od npr.20 KT, iznad gusto naseljenog mjesta, nece poravnati 2-3 kvadratna kilometra i pobiti desetine, mozda i stotine hiljada ljudi?
Nece biti radijacije?
- no_sekirli
- Posts: 6873
- Joined: 02/10/2013 18:36
#69860 Re: IRAN
Ljudi dragi, zar vi smatrate da u Pentagonu sjede neke hablacine koje ne znaju sta ih ceka ako krenu kopneno? Mislim Kramp i ekipa oko njega su zlotvori namazani, tu nema sumnje, ali generali nisu budale, i imaju iskustva iz proslosti.
Bilo koja vrsta N oruzja nakon prve upotrebe ce otvoriti zadnju fazu postojanja ljudske vrste, i cisto sumnjam da bi i idioti poput magaraca krenuli na taj put.
Bilo koja vrsta N oruzja nakon prve upotrebe ce otvoriti zadnju fazu postojanja ljudske vrste, i cisto sumnjam da bi i idioti poput magaraca krenuli na taj put.
- Dozer
- Posts: 32778
- Joined: 19/09/2008 10:14
- Location: Zemlja maloumne ENV matrice...
#69862 Re: IRAN
Vratis se na pocetak desavanja, i lagano.no_sekirli wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:29Od kad se tvoja sva predvidjanja ostvare, naravno. Ne moze se desiti nista, a da ti to nisi vec najavioDozer wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:20Otkad je predvidjanje na bazi desavanja i izjava = prizivanje...no_sekirli wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:12 Forumasi bukvalno prizivaju takticke nuklearne bombe, kao i kopnenu invaziju da bude krvi do koljena.
Horor.![]()
Jos se ceka klaonica 82.padobranske na Khargu.
- Billy The Pljuc
- Posts: 4009
- Joined: 06/02/2015 07:59
- Location: Odakle sam bio više nisam...
#69864 Re: IRAN
Opa, proš'o Ramazan i mERe se lajat'. Pa kad je tako @muha_sa hebem te stara
Apropo kraljice, niste vas dvojica ni ludi, istu želju dobih danas kad vidjeh Kolindinu sliku u nakom bezveze članku.
- skrbavi-admin
- Posts: 6833
- Joined: 31/12/2021 17:16
- Location: Pakšobistan Wolfuckosia
#69865 Re: IRAN
obzirom na to da su vojsku napustali i bili otpustani nepodobni ljudi i da to vjerovatno nisi upratio, smatram.....no_sekirli wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:45 Ljudi dragi, zar vi smatrate da u Pentagonu sjede neke hablacine koje ne znaju sta ih ceka ako krenu kopneno? Mislim Kramp i ekipa oko njega su zlotvori namazani, tu nema sumnje, ali generali nisu budale, i imaju iskustva iz proslosti.
Bilo koja vrsta N oruzja nakon prve upotrebe ce otvoriti zadnju fazu postojanja ljudske vrste, i cisto sumnjam da bi i idioti poput magaraca krenuli na taj put.
umjesto Woke furke sada je zavladala Naci furka koja se (ne)ocekivano svidjela i pizdagelu
- alijagoro
- Posts: 7877
- Joined: 06/03/2008 18:02
- Dozer
- Posts: 32778
- Joined: 19/09/2008 10:14
- Location: Zemlja maloumne ENV matrice...
#69869 Re: IRAN
Nije ovo WW2 i Japan ba...GungodessMissFortune wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:44Osim mrtvih, ništa se strašno nece dogoditi u smislu smaka svijeta. Tek onda če se vidjeti da nuklearno oružje nije ono što se misli da jeste a to je da je oružje koje završava sukobe.Dozer wrote: ↑02/04/2026 20:44Sta tacno nije sto se misli?GungodessMissFortune wrote: ↑02/04/2026 20:31 Da hoće više neko bacit tu nuklearku pa da onda tek vidite da to nije ono što se misli da jest. Mislim helouuu.
TN od npr.20 KT, iznad gusto naseljenog mjesta, nece poravnati 2-3 kvadratna kilometra i pobiti desetine, mozda i stotine hiljada ljudi?
Nece biti radijacije?
Sta kazes...nista OSIM MRTVIH? Kao, sasvin je OK i nebitno odjednom pobiti 100K ljudi...?
Bitno je da nece biti smak svijeta zbog toga... Ko je uopste spominjao smak svijeta...?
Last edited by Dozer on 02/04/2026 21:59, edited 1 time in total.
-
sumirprimus
- Posts: 88884
- Joined: 10/02/2010 07:54
- Location: Bunker :D Saj ops
#69870 Re: IRAN
BREAKING: Jordan's parliament speaker calls for a post-war joint defense and economic treaty encompassing the Arab world to defend against Iran, who he says is considering reviving the Persian Empire and wants to incite Shiites across the Arab world.
Tek ce iran imati problema sa susedima. Dobro nacet I unisten
Tek ce iran imati problema sa susedima. Dobro nacet I unisten
- Hajlac
- Posts: 5746
- Joined: 15/02/2012 15:08
- Location: Chris Hedges!
#69871 Re: IRAN
"What Arab Regimes Fear Most Is Iran’s Example
Even as missiles rain down on co-belligerent Arab regimes, Iran is perceived by them as a threat not primarily on account of its military power but because it embodies what sovereignty looks like when exercised as a political practice rather than as an empty formal claim, one that simultaneously indicts the past and destabilises the future.
Until now, the Arab state system has operated on the premise that the US and Israel set the limits of the politically possible in the region and that regimes which accept those limits will be protected--an order maintained by a regional orthodoxy that framed subordination as a strategic and sovereign choice.
But Iran is now demonstrating (not only to subservient Arab regimes but to Europe and beyond) what substantive state sovereignty means in practice, while teaching how popular sovereignty emerges once a state has constructed the collective sovereign subject that reproduces it. The result is a depth of popular identification in which even critics rally behind the state in moments of existential confrontation, defending not necessarily the government but the state as the political expression of the collective to which they belong. No Arab leader could possibly fathom how former protestors and even dissidents might refrain from undermining, much less rally behind their state in such moments, because no Arab state has constructed the collective sovereign subject that would make such identification possible.
If this war confirms what is already becoming difficult to deny, that Iran and Hizbullah have imposed costs capable of deterring future aggression and reshaping the regional order, it will amount to a historical renewal of the Iranian revolution, bringing back into view the sovereignty question that gave rise to it and that the Arab order was built to suppress. The deeper danger for this order lies in that question which foregrounds what has long been concealed, that the surrender of sovereignty was always a political choice rather than a necessity and that the bargain demanding submission in exchange for protection ultimately delivered neither sovereignty nor security."
Amal Saad
@amalsaad_lb
Even as missiles rain down on co-belligerent Arab regimes, Iran is perceived by them as a threat not primarily on account of its military power but because it embodies what sovereignty looks like when exercised as a political practice rather than as an empty formal claim, one that simultaneously indicts the past and destabilises the future.
Until now, the Arab state system has operated on the premise that the US and Israel set the limits of the politically possible in the region and that regimes which accept those limits will be protected--an order maintained by a regional orthodoxy that framed subordination as a strategic and sovereign choice.
But Iran is now demonstrating (not only to subservient Arab regimes but to Europe and beyond) what substantive state sovereignty means in practice, while teaching how popular sovereignty emerges once a state has constructed the collective sovereign subject that reproduces it. The result is a depth of popular identification in which even critics rally behind the state in moments of existential confrontation, defending not necessarily the government but the state as the political expression of the collective to which they belong. No Arab leader could possibly fathom how former protestors and even dissidents might refrain from undermining, much less rally behind their state in such moments, because no Arab state has constructed the collective sovereign subject that would make such identification possible.
If this war confirms what is already becoming difficult to deny, that Iran and Hizbullah have imposed costs capable of deterring future aggression and reshaping the regional order, it will amount to a historical renewal of the Iranian revolution, bringing back into view the sovereignty question that gave rise to it and that the Arab order was built to suppress. The deeper danger for this order lies in that question which foregrounds what has long been concealed, that the surrender of sovereignty was always a political choice rather than a necessity and that the bargain demanding submission in exchange for protection ultimately delivered neither sovereignty nor security."
Amal Saad
@amalsaad_lb
- GungodessMissFortune
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 27/05/2025 07:12
#69872 Re: IRAN
Nikakve to veze nema. Nuklearnim oružjem neće postići ono što bi željeli i to svi vrlo dobro znaju, zato ga niko i ne koristi, jer kad zec izađe iz šešira niko ga više ne vrati.Dozer wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:53Nije ovo WW2 i Japan ba...GungodessMissFortune wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:44Osim mrtvih, ništa se strašno nece dogoditi u smislu smaka svijeta. Tek onda če se vidjeti da nuklearno oružje nije ono što se misli da jeste a to je da je oružje koje završava sukobe.![]()
- skrbavi-admin
- Posts: 6833
- Joined: 31/12/2021 17:16
- Location: Pakšobistan Wolfuckosia
#69873 Re: IRAN
koji ba zec - suverena zemlja bez ikakvog povoda napadnuta najbrutalnije sto moze i udara se nemilice - ubivsi joj naucnike, predsjednike, drzavnike, diplomatiju jer se eto gospodi iz posrajela ne svidja establismentGungodessMissFortune wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:59Nikakve to veze nema. Nuklearnim oružjem neće postići ono što bi željeli i to svi vrlo dobro znaju, zato ga niko i ne koristi, jer kad zec izađe iz šešira niko ga više ne vrati.Dozer wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:53Nije ovo WW2 i Japan ba...GungodessMissFortune wrote: ↑02/04/2026 21:44
Osim mrtvih, ništa se strašno nece dogoditi u smislu smaka svijeta. Tek onda če se vidjeti da nuklearno oružje nije ono što se misli da jeste a to je da je oružje koje završava sukobe.![]()
- Ironmen
- Posts: 7502
- Joined: 29/07/2015 17:36
