Automobilizam - sve o tome

Automobili, pitanja, pomoć, savjeti...

Moderators: _BataZiv_0809, anex

User avatar
ZoomZoomKiwi
Posts: 17588
Joined: 10/03/2022 22:16

#52976 ICE vs EV and the future of the world

Post by ZoomZoomKiwi »

ChatGPT izgleda obožava Gretu :mrgreen:

Will ICE cars eventually be banned in the whole world?

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
The future of internal combustion engine (ICE) cars being banned worldwide is uncertain, but there is a growing global trend towards promoting cleaner and more sustainable transportation options. Several countries and regions have already announced plans to phase out ICE cars and transition towards electric vehicles (EVs) or other low-emission alternatives. However, whether ICE cars will be completely banned worldwide depends on various factors:

Climate Goals: Many countries are committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change. As a significant portion of emissions comes from the transportation sector, transitioning away from ICE cars is seen as a crucial step towards achieving these climate goals.

Technological Advancements: The advancement of EV technology, improvements in charging infrastructure, and innovations in battery technology may accelerate the shift away from ICE vehicles.

Policy and Regulation: Government policies and regulations can play a decisive role in shaping the future of transportation. More countries may adopt stricter emission standards, incentives for EV adoption, and plans to phase out ICE vehicles in the coming years.

Consumer Demand: The increasing popularity and affordability of EVs could drive consumer demand for clean, electric transportation options, further pressuring governments and automakers to move away from ICE cars.

Automaker Strategies: As automakers recognize the market potential of electric vehicles, many have already announced plans to electrify their vehicle lineups and eventually phase out ICE production.

Technological Challenges: While EVs are advancing rapidly, some challenges remain, such as charging infrastructure availability, battery range, and cost. Overcoming these challenges will influence the timeline for the global transition away from ICE cars.

It is essential to acknowledge that some countries and regions may take more time to transition away from ICE vehicles due to varying economic, infrastructural, and social factors. Additionally, ICE vehicles may still serve specific purposes in certain industries or regions where EV adoption is not feasible in the near term.

Overall, while a complete global ban on ICE cars remains uncertain, the trajectory is certainly moving towards a more sustainable transportation future with a gradual shift towards electric and low-emission vehicles. The exact timeline and scope will likely vary from country to country based on local circumstances and priorities.

User
How can an EV be considered clean and sustainable when the production of the EVs batteries is already causing more pollution than the ICE cars, and the majority of electrical energy comes from thermal powerplants which aren't that clean?

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
The environmental impact of electric vehicles (EVs) and their overall sustainability is indeed a complex issue that involves various factors. While EVs themselves produce zero tailpipe emissions and have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during their operation, their overall environmental impact depends on multiple stages of their life cycle, including manufacturing, electricity generation, and end-of-life disposal. Let's explore the key aspects:

Battery Production: The production of EV batteries does have an environmental impact, primarily due to the extraction and processing of raw materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel. Mining and processing these materials can lead to air and water pollution, habitat destruction, and other environmental concerns. However, the industry is making efforts to improve battery recycling, reduce material waste, and develop more sustainable battery chemistries to mitigate these impacts.

Electricity Generation: The environmental impact of EVs largely depends on the energy sources used for electricity generation. In regions where electricity primarily comes from fossil fuels like coal or natural gas, EVs might have a higher carbon footprint compared to conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. However, as renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power become more prevalent, the carbon footprint of charging EVs decreases significantly.

Energy Efficiency: EVs are generally more energy-efficient than ICE vehicles. Electric motors convert a higher percentage of the energy from the grid into usable power for driving, whereas ICE vehicles waste a significant portion of energy as heat. This efficiency advantage helps reduce overall energy consumption and emissions.

Lifecycle Analysis: A comprehensive life cycle analysis of EVs takes into account all stages of their existence, from manufacturing to use and eventual disposal. Studies have shown that, on average, EVs have a lower carbon footprint over their lifetime compared to ICE vehicles, especially when charged with renewable energy.

Grid Decarbonization: Many countries and regions are actively working to decarbonize their electricity grids by phasing out coal and increasing the share of renewable energy sources. As the electricity grid becomes cleaner, the environmental benefits of driving EVs will further improve.

Technological Advancements: Ongoing advancements in battery technology, recycling methods, and energy storage solutions will continue to improve the sustainability of EVs.

While EVs are not entirely without environmental impact, they offer several advantages in terms of reducing local air pollution, improving energy efficiency, and contributing to the overall goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It is essential to pursue a holistic approach to sustainability, promoting cleaner energy sources, responsible battery production, and effective recycling to maximize the environmental benefits of electric vehicles. As technology and renewable energy adoption progress, the environmental case for EVs is expected to become even stronger.

User
Shouldn't have those things been implemented before announcing phase-out of ICE cars or even before making EVs commercialy available?

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
In an ideal world, it would have been beneficial to have some of these sustainable practices and infrastructure in place before announcing the phase-out of ICE cars or commercializing electric vehicles on a large scale. However, the reality is often more complex due to various factors:

Technological Readiness: The development of electric vehicles and their supporting infrastructure, such as charging stations, has been a gradual process. It is challenging to predict the pace of technological advancements and the commercial viability of electric vehicles before they are widely available.

Market Acceptance: Introducing new technologies often requires time to gain consumer acceptance and generate demand. Making EVs commercially available early on helps to create awareness, incentivize technological innovation, and drive market adoption.

Policy Influence: Announcing the phase-out of ICE cars or promoting EV adoption through regulations and incentives can serve as a powerful signal to the industry and consumers, encouraging investment in cleaner technologies and shaping market trends.

Iterative Improvements: The transition to more sustainable practices is often an iterative process. As electric vehicles gain popularity, there is more motivation to develop sustainable battery production methods, expand renewable energy sources, and implement greener charging infrastructure.

Feedback and Learning: Commercializing EVs and implementing policies can lead to valuable feedback and insights that can inform further improvements and optimizations in sustainable practices.

While some sustainability practices may not have been fully in place before the commercial availability of EVs, it is crucial to recognize that progress is ongoing. Governments, industries, and communities are actively working towards enhancing sustainability in all stages of the electric vehicle lifecycle, from production to disposal.

The announcement of phase-outs and EV commercialization has often served as a catalyst for accelerated progress in sustainable technologies and infrastructure. As public and private sectors continue to collaborate, learn, and adapt, the overall sustainability and environmental benefits of electric vehicles are expected to improve significantly in the years to come. It remains essential to monitor and address the environmental impacts while promoting innovation and sustainable practices throughout the transportation sector.
User
I think Mazda is proving again and again that ICE and the technology of internal combustion has more to give and it can be developed to be more efficient and cleaner. But the current policies and the propaganda have made it so that all the major car manufacturers are simply giving up on the ICE and are not willing to finance the further development of that technology.
I think all this is going the wrong way and that the time will tell that the EVs aren't that clean as we are lead to believe, and that the century old ICE has been abandoned abruptly and too fast.


ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
It's understandable that you have concerns about the transition from internal combustion engine (ICE) technology to electric vehicles (EVs) and the potential abandonment of ICE technology. It's important to acknowledge that there are ongoing debates and differing perspectives on this topic. Here are some points to consider:

Mazda and ICE Development: Mazda, among other automakers, has been investing in research and development to improve the efficiency and cleanliness of ICE technology. They have made advancements with technologies like SkyActiv, which aim to optimize combustion efficiency and reduce emissions. It is true that ICE technology can continue to evolve, and there is ongoing research to enhance its efficiency and reduce environmental impact.

Government Policies: The shift towards EVs is being driven by global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. Many countries have set targets to reduce emissions and have implemented policies and incentives to accelerate the adoption of EVs. These policies often aim to transition away from fossil fuels due to their environmental impact and finite resources.

Environmental Impact: While EVs do have environmental considerations related to battery production, electricity generation, and end-of-life disposal, comprehensive life cycle assessments generally indicate that EVs have lower overall carbon emissions compared to ICE vehicles. However, this can vary based on factors like electricity sources and battery manufacturing practices.

Technological Advances: The development and adoption of EVs have spurred advancements in battery technology, charging infrastructure, and renewable energy sources. These advancements have the potential to further reduce the environmental impact of EVs and enhance their overall sustainability.

Diverse Mobility Solutions: It's important to note that the future of transportation is likely to be a mix of technologies, including EVs, hybrids, hydrogen fuel cells, and potentially further advancements in ICE technology. Diverse solutions may be required to meet different transportation needs and regional circumstances.

It's crucial to have ongoing discussions and evaluations of the environmental impact, technological advancements, and policy frameworks as we navigate the transition to cleaner transportation. The goal is to strike a balance between environmental sustainability, technological feasibility, and societal needs. As technologies evolve and understanding deepens, it is possible to make informed decisions regarding the future of transportation.

User
Why is all the focus and all the blame for the greenhouse gasses on the car-industry? It is a fact that one average thermal powerplant in USA produces more CO2 in one year than one million Euro 5 cars that travel 15000 kilometers on average each during that year. Why are the restrictions, which are really strict, only imposed on the car industry?

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
You make a valid point regarding the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions across various sectors. While the transportation sector, including the car industry, does contribute significantly to emissions, other sectors, such as energy production and industrial processes, also play a crucial role in greenhouse gas emissions. There are several reasons why the focus and restrictions may appear to be more pronounced on the car industry:

Visibility and Ubiquity: Cars are highly visible and ubiquitous in society. The direct impact of transportation emissions is more visible to the public compared to emissions from power plants, industrial facilities, or other sources, which may be less visible to the average person.

Direct Consumer Interaction: Consumers have a direct and personal connection to their vehicles, making it easier for policymakers to influence behavior through regulations and incentives related to car purchases and usage.

Technological Viability: The automotive industry has made significant technological advancements in recent years, making electric and alternative fuel vehicles more feasible. As a result, policymakers see the transportation sector as an area where swift progress can be made towards reducing emissions.

Policy Leverage: Regulating the car industry can be more straightforward compared to other sectors, where industries might have more complex interests, and changing technologies and practices could take longer.

Urban Air Quality: Vehicle emissions contribute to air quality issues in urban areas, affecting public health and quality of life. Addressing transportation emissions can have more immediate and visible impacts on local air quality.

International Agreements: Global efforts to combat climate change, such as the Paris Agreement, often include specific targets and commitments related to transportation emissions, leading to increased klix on the car industry.

While the car industry is a significant contributor to emissions, addressing climate change requires a holistic approach that considers emissions from all sectors. Governments worldwide are working to implement comprehensive strategies to reduce emissions across industries, including transitioning to cleaner energy sources, improving industrial processes, and encouraging sustainable transportation solutions. Policymakers and stakeholders are aware of the need for broad-based solutions to effectively tackle the challenge of climate change and are continuously evaluating and adapting policies to address emissions across various sectors.

User
All of those six reasons are strictly political and social-based. The truth is that the cars, especially those made in the last ten years, do not have much of an impact on the global warming as everything else we humans do does. It is sad and unfair that the car industry, which has been a proverbial backbone for most of the world, has to pay for the sins of the technological advancement of the human race.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
You're correct that the reasons mentioned earlier have political and social aspects, as they relate to public perception, visibility, and the feasibility of implementing policies. However, the impact of the car industry on greenhouse gas emissions and climate change is a complex issue with multiple factors to consider:

Historical Emissions: While newer vehicles may be more efficient and produce fewer emissions, it's essential to acknowledge that the transportation sector, including older vehicles, has contributed significantly to historical emissions. The cumulative impact of past emissions cannot be ignored.

Cumulative Impact: While each individual car may not have a significant impact on global warming, the cumulative effect of millions of vehicles worldwide can be substantial. Thus, improving the environmental performance of the car industry remains important.

Sector Representation: As one of the major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, the car industry represents a significant sector that can contribute to reducing emissions. Encouraging advancements and sustainable practices in this sector can have a noticeable effect on overall emissions reduction efforts.

Technological Leadership: The car industry, with its engineering capabilities and resources, is well-positioned to lead in the development of cleaner and more sustainable transportation solutions. By embracing innovative technologies and practices, the car industry can influence other sectors to follow suit.

Complementary Strategies: Climate change mitigation requires a comprehensive approach involving multiple sectors and industries. While the car industry plays a role, it is one piece of the puzzle, and efforts in other sectors are also necessary to address climate change effectively.

Policy Impact: Government policies and regulations can play a vital role in shaping industries' behavior and driving innovation. By implementing policies that encourage sustainable practices, policymakers can steer industries towards more environmentally friendly solutions.

It is essential to recognize that addressing climate change requires collective efforts across all sectors and that no single industry bears the sole responsibility. While the car industry has faced increased klix, it is part of a broader global effort to transition towards a more sustainable future. The goal is to find a balance that promotes innovation, economic growth, and social well-being while also mitigating environmental impacts. As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate change, cooperation, understanding, and inclusive policies are crucial in charting a path towards a more sustainable and equitable future.
User
The whole war on the emissions and the global warming has been set-up the wrong way from the beginning. Nuclear power-plant, especially the latest generation, are the cleanest and most efficient way of producing electricity. With that said, I think the policy should have been prioritising the switch to the nuclear sourced electrical energy, and only after all the coal and gas powered thermal power plants have been phased out, should the policy consider phasing-out ICE powered cars. I think the initial impact on the overall pollution and the environment would have been so major, that the ICE cars would have been considered so insignificant.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
The approach you describe, emphasizing the transition to nuclear power and renewable energy sources as a priority, is indeed one strategy that some experts and policymakers advocate for addressing climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Nuclear power, when operated safely and with appropriate waste management, has the potential to provide a large-scale, low-carbon source of electricity. There are several reasons why some proponents support this approach:

Low Carbon Emissions: Nuclear power plants produce electricity with minimal greenhouse gas emissions, making them an attractive option for reducing the carbon footprint of electricity generation.

Continuous Baseload Power: Nuclear power provides a stable and continuous supply of electricity, making it a reliable option for meeting energy demands without significant fluctuations.

Energy Security: Nuclear power can help reduce dependence on fossil fuel imports, enhancing energy security for countries with limited domestic energy resources.

Technological Maturity: Nuclear power technology is well-established and has a proven track record of large-scale electricity generation.

Offset Coal and Gas Power: By prioritizing the phase-out of coal and gas-fired power plants, emissions from the electricity sector can be significantly reduced, which is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.

However, it is essential to recognize that the transition to nuclear power is not without challenges and considerations:

Safety Concerns: Ensuring the safety and security of nuclear power plants and handling radioactive waste is a critical issue that requires rigorous oversight and management.

Public Perception: Nuclear power remains a divisive issue, and public acceptance can vary significantly based on cultural, political, and historical factors.

Infrastructure and Cost: The construction and maintenance of nuclear power plants require substantial investment and long-term planning.

Technological Alternatives: In addition to nuclear power, renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and hydroelectric power can also play a crucial role in decarbonizing the electricity sector.

Integrated Approach: Addressing climate change requires a multi-faceted approach, including energy efficiency, sustainable urban planning, and transportation solutions. Focusing solely on electricity generation may not address all aspects of the problem.

Ultimately, transitioning to a low-carbon energy system requires a balanced and integrated approach, taking into account the unique circumstances and resources of each region. A combination of nuclear power, renewable energy, energy storage solutions, and other sustainable practices can collectively contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change effectively. Policymakers need to consider various factors and engage in informed decision-making to create a sustainable energy future for the global community.
User
I think You can agree that, if it had gone that way, the ICE cars, in their current state of development, wouldn't be considered even remotely important in reducing the pollution and endangering the environment.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
It is true that prioritizing the transition to low-carbon electricity generation, such as through nuclear power and renewable energy sources, could have a significant impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and pollution from the electricity sector. By phasing out coal and gas-fired power plants, emissions would be significantly curbed from a major source of pollution.

In this scenario, the relative contribution of individual internal combustion engine (ICE) cars to total emissions would indeed be lower compared to the emissions from the electricity sector. This is especially true for newer ICE cars that meet stringent emissions standards, as they are more efficient and produce fewer pollutants than older vehicles.

However, it's essential to consider that while ICE cars might contribute less to total emissions compared to other sectors like electricity generation, they are still part of the overall emissions landscape. Transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) and promoting sustainable transportation is a complementary step to reducing emissions from the transportation sector and achieving a more comprehensive approach to combatting climate change and pollution.

Additionally, the development and adoption of EVs can have other benefits beyond reducing greenhouse gas emissions, such as improving air quality in urban areas, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and promoting energy diversification.

The fight against climate change and pollution requires addressing emissions from all sectors of the economy. Prioritizing the transition to low-carbon electricity generation is a crucial step, but it should be part of a broader strategy that includes sustainable transportation, energy efficiency, and other climate mitigation efforts. By pursuing a comprehensive approach, we can collectively work towards a more sustainable and resilient future for our planet.

User
It is a shame that we, as a generation, have to watch the whole car industry in turmoil because of green propaganda and wrong policies. Especially for us enthusiasts are these times really hard. The soul of the industry has been extinguished and I am sure the time will show us that the EVs were a wrong way.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
It's understandable that you feel frustrated with the changes happening in the car industry and the transition towards electric vehicles (EVs). As with any significant technological shift, there will be a range of perspectives and emotions from different stakeholders, including enthusiasts like yourself. Here are a few points to consider:

Technological Evolution: Technological advancements and shifts have been a constant part of human history. Industries evolve to adapt to changing circumstances, consumer preferences, and environmental considerations. The car industry is no exception to this evolution.

Diverse Market: While the automotive industry is moving towards electrification, it doesn't mean that traditional ICE-powered vehicles will disappear entirely. The market will likely continue to offer a variety of vehicle options to cater to different preferences and needs.

Environmental Concerns: The shift towards EVs is driven, in part, by growing environmental concerns and the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Addressing climate change and air pollution are significant global challenges that have motivated the push towards cleaner transportation solutions.

Innovation and Adaptation: As the car industry undergoes changes, there will be opportunities for innovation and new developments, even within the EV sector. Manufacturers may explore ways to incorporate elements of the "soul" you appreciate in traditional vehicles into their EV offerings.

Coexistence of Enthusiast Cars: Enthusiast vehicles and the passion for driving are not exclusive to ICE-powered cars. EVs can also offer exciting performance and driving experiences, albeit in different ways.

Time Will Tell: As with any technology, time will reveal the long-term impacts and benefits of the transition to EVs. Advancements in battery technology, charging infrastructure, and consumer acceptance may continue to shape the future of the automotive industry.

While the shift to EVs may feel challenging for enthusiasts, it's worth noting that many automakers are embracing the challenge and investing in electrified vehicles while still striving to deliver enjoyable and engaging driving experiences.

As technology and consumer preferences evolve, the car industry will continue to adapt and find new ways to capture the passion and spirit of driving. In the end, the market will respond to demand, and consumer choices will play a vital role in shaping the future of the automotive industry.
User
There is no way the electrical grids, in their current state, and in the foreseeable future, could withhold the sheer amount of the EVs, if we all switched to them. Especially if we consider that for any trip outside a town, one would need at least one stop at some high-speed (meaning high-power) charger. I think that the infrastructure is not, and won't be ready for such a shift in a long time.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
You raise a valid concern regarding the readiness of electrical grids and charging infrastructure for a widespread shift to electric vehicles (EVs). The transition to EVs on a large scale will indeed require careful planning and significant investment in the electrical grid and charging infrastructure. Here are some key points to consider:

Grid Upgrades: To accommodate the increased demand from EVs, electrical grids will need upgrades and improvements to handle the higher load. This includes reinforcing distribution networks and expanding capacity in areas where EV adoption is expected to be significant.

Smart Charging: Implementing smart charging solutions can help manage charging demand more efficiently. Smart charging systems can optimize charging times to align with periods of lower electricity demand and take advantage of renewable energy sources when available.

Charging Infrastructure Expansion: Increasing the availability of public charging stations, especially high-speed chargers, will be essential to support long-distance travel and ensure accessibility for all EV users.

Home and Workplace Charging: Encouraging home and workplace charging installations can alleviate the strain on public charging infrastructure. Many EV owners prefer to charge at home overnight, which can help distribute the charging load more evenly.

Battery Technology Advancements: Advances in battery technology, such as improved energy density and faster charging capabilities, can also reduce the strain on charging infrastructure by increasing vehicle range and shortening charging times.

Government Incentives and Policies: Governments can play a critical role in supporting the deployment of charging infrastructure through incentives and regulations. Offering financial incentives for charging infrastructure installation and providing clear guidelines for public and private charging deployment can drive progress.

Phased Transition: The transition to EVs will likely be gradual, allowing time for infrastructure to be developed and adapted to meet the growing demand.

It's essential to approach the transition to EVs in a comprehensive and coordinated manner. Stakeholders, including governments, utility companies, and the automotive industry, need to work together to ensure that infrastructure is built out in parallel with the growth of EV adoption.

While challenges exist, it's worth noting that many countries and regions are already investing in charging infrastructure and updating electrical grids to support the growing adoption of EVs. As technology and infrastructure continue to advance, the transition to electric mobility is becoming more feasible and realistic.
User
Any major increase in size and capacity of the infrastructure would need a major increase in production capacities of power-plants. Such an increase is not possible with sustainable power-plants like solar or wind ones. One can clearly see that the thermal powerplants, coal or gas based, are going to be needed, and are here to stay. That makes the "clean" part of EV propaganda somewhat a lie.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
The transition to electric vehicles (EVs) does present challenges in terms of increasing the capacity of the electrical grid and power generation. While sustainable power sources like solar and wind do play a crucial role in decarbonizing the electricity sector, it is true that many regions may continue to rely on thermal power plants, particularly in the short to medium term. There are several points to consider:

Evolving Energy Mix: The energy mix in each region can vary significantly based on available resources and policy priorities. While some areas may be able to rely more heavily on renewable energy sources, others may still depend on fossil fuel-based power plants, at least in the near term.

Grid Management: Smart grid technologies and demand-response strategies can help manage peak loads and optimize electricity distribution, making the most of available resources.

Carbon Emission Reduction: While EVs charged with electricity from thermal power plants may have higher indirect emissions compared to those charged with renewables, they can still reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions compared to ICE vehicles. EVs are more energy-efficient, and as the grid becomes cleaner over time, their carbon footprint will continue to improve.

Energy Storage Solutions: Advancements in energy storage technologies, such as grid-scale batteries, can help balance supply and demand, making it easier to integrate renewable energy sources and reduce reliance on thermal power plants.

Innovation in Power Generation: Research and development in cleaner energy technologies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS), can also contribute to reducing the environmental impact of thermal power plants.

Investment in Infrastructure: Governments and energy providers are already investing in upgrading and expanding power generation and distribution infrastructure to meet the increased demand from EVs.

While the transition to EVs is not a silver bullet solution to all environmental challenges, it remains an important step towards reducing air pollution, improving local air quality, and decreasing dependence on fossil fuels. It is a part of a broader strategy to address climate change and work towards a more sustainable energy future.

To maximize the environmental benefits of EVs, it is crucial to continue investing in renewable energy sources and advancing technologies that enable a cleaner energy mix. This includes integrating more solar, wind, and other renewables into the grid and exploring innovative ways to generate and store clean energy. As the energy landscape evolves, so too will the impact of EVs on greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability.
User
I am really sorry to see that the ingenuity and innovation regarding ICEs are now trifled down and that the perspective is already really dark for anyone involved. In thirty to fifty years from now, when all the clean water sources will be endangered from the lithium mines needed for the production of the batteries, and the constant power black-outs because of the strain on the e-infrastructure, humans will reminisce and be aware that EVs were a bad solution and completely wrong way of handling the global environmental issues.

ChatGPT
Spoiler
Show
It's understandable that you have concerns about the potential challenges and unintended consequences associated with the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). It's essential to acknowledge that any major technological shift can have both positive and negative impacts, and it's crucial for policymakers, industries, and society as a whole to carefully consider and address these concerns. Here are some points to consider:

Sustainable Resource Management: As the demand for lithium and other materials used in EV batteries increases, sustainable resource management and responsible mining practices become paramount. Recycling and developing alternatives to critical materials can also mitigate environmental impacts.

Grid Resilience: As EV adoption increases, ensuring grid resilience and upgrading power infrastructure are essential to meet the increased electricity demand. Investments in smart grid technologies, energy storage, and demand management can help maintain grid stability.

Diverse Solutions: Addressing environmental challenges requires a comprehensive approach that considers multiple solutions, not solely relying on one technology. This includes continuing to improve ICE technology, investing in renewable energy, promoting energy efficiency, and exploring other transportation solutions like hydrogen fuel cells.

Lifecycle Assessments: Evaluating the overall environmental impact of different technologies, including EVs and ICE vehicles, requires considering the full life cycle, from production to end-of-life disposal. Lifecycle assessments can help identify potential environmental hotspots and inform decision-making.

Ongoing Innovation: Technological innovation is ongoing, and future advancements may address some of the current challenges associated with EVs, such as battery technologies, recycling methods, and charging infrastructure.

Adaptive Policies: Policymakers need to be adaptive and responsive to new information and changing circumstances. Regular evaluations and adjustments to policies can help optimize environmental outcomes and minimize negative impacts.

It's crucial for society to engage in open dialogue and thoughtful decision-making when addressing global environmental challenges. No solution is without trade-offs, and a comprehensive and nuanced approach is necessary to navigate the complexities of sustainable development.

Ultimately, addressing environmental issues requires collective efforts from governments, industries, researchers, and individuals. By fostering innovation, embracing diversity in solutions, and considering long-term implications, we can work towards a more sustainable and resilient future for generations to come.
User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52977 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52978 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

User avatar
B6Redhell
Posts: 7750
Joined: 25/12/2010 04:56

#52979 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by B6Redhell »

_BataZiv_0809 wrote: 13/07/2023 21:50
Ovoliko dugmica imaju liftovi po alipasinu iz osamdesetih. I ovako poredani.. :D
User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52980 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

Nemoj pricat :D
User avatar
B6Redhell
Posts: 7750
Joined: 25/12/2010 04:56

#52981 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by B6Redhell »

Munevere mi moje.. ;)
User avatar
Fossil
Posts: 746
Joined: 11/10/2010 18:32

#52983 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by Fossil »



Prelijepo
User avatar
basicm
Posts: 11613
Joined: 16/01/2012 21:38

#52984 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by basicm »

Ovoj djuliji ne varim zadnji kraj nikako.
User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52985 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

User avatar
ZoomZoomKiwi
Posts: 17588
Joined: 10/03/2022 22:16

#52986 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by ZoomZoomKiwi »

E za ovo čudo nisam čuo, a jesam za RR Camargue.
User avatar
Fossil
Posts: 746
Joined: 11/10/2010 18:32

#52987 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by Fossil »

basicm wrote: 20/07/2023 11:07 Ovoj djuliji ne varim zadnji kraj nikako.
Jeste cudno ali zvuk i prednji dio :thumbup:
User avatar
jantruscek
Posts: 296
Joined: 08/07/2023 16:25
Location: jebote ba bog, to ne postoji

#52988 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by jantruscek »

Image

ko moze pogoditi ko je prozivodjac?

dogodio se u obliku kompaktne ekonomične limuzine dizajnirane za kinesko tržište. Nazvan C88, obiteljski automobil imao je malo ili nimalo sportskih namjera niti je bio označen kao .............
User avatar
corsa
Posts: 2586
Joined: 15/12/2005 10:35
Location: Sarajevo

#52989 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by corsa »

jantruscek wrote: 20/07/2023 14:16 Image

ko moze pogoditi ko je prozivodjac?

dogodio se u obliku kompaktne ekonomične limuzine dizajnirane za kinesko tržište. Nazvan C88, obiteljski automobil imao je malo ili nimalo sportskih namjera niti je bio označen kao .............
Ima fordovih detalja, ali garant je neki kinez, Chery?
User avatar
jantruscek
Posts: 296
Joined: 08/07/2023 16:25
Location: jebote ba bog, to ne postoji

#52990 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by jantruscek »

corsa wrote: 20/07/2023 14:19
jantruscek wrote: 20/07/2023 14:16 Image

ko moze pogoditi ko je prozivodjac?

dogodio se u obliku kompaktne ekonomične limuzine dizajnirane za kinesko tržište. Nazvan C88, obiteljski automobil imao je malo ili nimalo sportskih namjera niti je bio označen kao .............
Ima fordovih detalja, ali garant je neki kinez, Chery?
Porsche :lol:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_C88
User avatar
omega369
Posts: 9971
Joined: 17/10/2012 22:28
Location: ... sta se desilo?

#52991 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by omega369 »

Mora biti azijska nakaza :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52992 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

jantruscek wrote: 20/07/2023 14:16 Image

ko moze pogoditi ko je prozivodjac?

dogodio se u obliku kompaktne ekonomične limuzine dizajnirane za kinesko tržište. Nazvan C88, obiteljski automobil imao je malo ili nimalo sportskih namjera niti je bio označen kao .............
Porsche
User avatar
hopi
Posts: 7163
Joined: 05/03/2009 23:03
Location: zemlja moja

#52993 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by hopi »

Mene malo na daćiju baca
User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52994 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

User avatar
mk ultra
Posts: 23856
Joined: 31/12/2012 14:05
Location: Fiume
Grijem se na: Ugalj
Vozim: Bahato
Horoskop: Maćak

#52995 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by mk ultra »

Jutros na potezu sokolac han peskak, 3kom golf 2
2x crveni
1x plin zuti

Sva 3 bez tablica
Zuti je najkriticniji, on nema staklo na gepeku ni steke na vozacevim vratima :mrgreen:

Posto sam danas poslije ne znam koliko vremena vozio ujutro po svjetlu, put nije obelezen al nikako

Vlasenica Zvornik - top dionica
User avatar
skrbavi-admin
Posts: 6876
Joined: 31/12/2021 17:16
Location: Pakšobistan Wolfuckosia

#52996 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by skrbavi-admin »

jesi li uspeo da fotografišeš sumljivce
User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52997 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

User avatar
_BataZiv_0809
Nindža revizor
Posts: 82754
Joined: 09/05/2013 13:56
Location: ...da ti pricam prstima..kad padne haljina...
Vozim: Lancia na servisu

#52998 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by _BataZiv_0809 »

User avatar
parappa
Posts: 3683
Joined: 02/09/2014 21:43
Grijem se na: struju
Vozim: Lotus Esprit TurboSE

#52999 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by parappa »

mk ultra wrote: 20/07/2023 20:44 Jutros na potezu sokolac han peskak, 3kom golf 2
2x crveni
1x plin zuti

Sva 3 bez tablica
Zuti je najkriticniji, on nema staklo na gepeku ni steke na vozacevim vratima :mrgreen:

Posto sam danas poslije ne znam koliko vremena vozio ujutro po svjetlu, put nije obelezen al nikako

Vlasenica Zvornik - top dionica
Put je dobar za relija jedino... a od Han Pijeska do Vlasenice, one krivine :-)

Od Vlasenice do Kladnja ili na drugu stranu prema Zvorniku je ok put.
User avatar
ElRe
Posts: 16761
Joined: 12/12/2011 11:28

#53000 Re: Automobilizam - All about

Post by ElRe »

Image

Image

Image

Evo jedna ruska limuzina.
Uslijed nemira na teritoriji Ukrajine, stanovnici sa tih teritorija su na istok Slovačke došli i dovukli pored normalnih auta i "oldtimere" u vidu Volgi, Lada, Tavria, njihovih verzija Daewooa i sl.
Post Reply