IRAN

User avatar
GandalfSivi
Posts: 10223
Joined: 09/09/2006 00:38
Contact:

#18501 Re: IRAN

Post by GandalfSivi » 29/05/2019 00:39

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Dole skroz u dnu. Crveno. Valjda u minusu su po tome. Pored toga ti pise da imaju skoro 400.000 assets po gradzaninu a Liability skoro 1.000.000 po gradzaninu.
Mijesas unfunded liabilities sa national debt-om. Ne mogu majke mi, ovo fakat nema smisla...


User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18502 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 00:43

GandalfSivi wrote:
Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Dole skroz u dnu. Crveno. Valjda u minusu su po tome. Pored toga ti pise da imaju skoro 400.000 assets po gradzaninu a Liability skoro 1.000.000 po gradzaninu.
Mijesas unfunded liabilities sa national debt-om. Ne mogu majke mi, ovo fakat nema smisla...
Ma mozda mijesam. Ja samo kazem da je crveno tj., kriticno. Ukupan dug 74 biliona dolara. Pise u tabeli. US total debt 74 biliona.
Last edited by Sanjarko on 29/05/2019 00:47, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
славянин
Posts: 11283
Joined: 30/05/2013 21:43
Location: Tuzla,Sarajevo i dalje :)

#18503 Re: IRAN

Post by славянин » 29/05/2019 00:44

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Ma mozda mijesam. Ja samo kazem je crveno tj., kriticno. Ukupan dug 74 biliona dolara. Pise u tabeli. US total debt 74 biliona.
"pravi" dug ti je onaj najveci broj u gornjem lijevom cosku - pise US Debt - 24 triliona :wink:

User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18504 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 00:47

Jbg. Ja gledam sta im je sve kriticno tj., sta su s crvenim obiljezili. Nisam ekonomista. Laik sam.

User avatar
славянин
Posts: 11283
Joined: 30/05/2013 21:43
Location: Tuzla,Sarajevo i dalje :)

#18505 Re: IRAN

Post by славянин » 29/05/2019 00:50

Vizionar 1985 wrote:Jbg. Ja gledam sta im je sve kriticno tj., sta su s crvenim obiljezili. Nisam ekonomista. Laik sam.
Interesantan nacin uvida u ekonomiju definitivno.... :D ekstravagantan rekao bih :D

User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18506 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 00:53

Kod mene je + i -. Tj., dze sam ja tu ili koliko sam ja dobar. Jbg ko Troterovi.

User avatar
славянин
Posts: 11283
Joined: 30/05/2013 21:43
Location: Tuzla,Sarajevo i dalje :)

#18507 Re: IRAN

Post by славянин » 29/05/2019 00:55

Vizionar 1985 wrote:Kod mene je + i -. Tj., dze sam ja tu ili koliko sam ja dobar. Jbg ko Troterovi.
This time next year ...- jelde :D New York-Paris-Pekham :D

User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18508 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 01:00

славянин wrote:
Vizionar 1985 wrote:Kod mene je + i -. Tj., dze sam ja tu ili koliko sam ja dobar. Jbg ko Troterovi.
This time next year ...- jelde :D New York-Paris-Pekham :D
Ma vise mozda ko Fazlinovici. :mrgreen: PS. Nisam materijalista. Nego samo gledam racunicu i da mi nije ona u minusu.

User avatar
King Theoden
Posts: 14454
Joined: 21/11/2018 13:15

#18509 Re: IRAN

Post by King Theoden » 29/05/2019 12:03

Vizionar 1985 wrote:
Dino34 wrote:Kina je svakako fugazi.
Kako sam shvatio Kina duguje vise nego sto ima po svemu i to je projektovano da ce samo rasti.

Nesjecam se samo kako. Nesto 300 sa 100. Tako nekako.
Najlakše je objasniti na primjeru.
Zamisli da deset najbogatijih ljudi na svijetu dođu u bosnu. Et, ćejf im da pomognu i kažu da će nas učiniti konkurentima na tržištu. Ustvari, ići će tako daleko da će od bosne napraviti glavnog baju na eu tržištu.
Recimo, naši farmeri će prodavati mlijeko za jedan fening po litru, a istovremeno će imati troškove proizvodnje od 20 feninga po litru.
Razliku od 19 feninga će platiti ti milijarderi.
Kina tj kineske firme rade nešto slično, samo što umjesto dobrotvora imaju kreditore.
Dakle, minuse koje prave pokrivaju novim kreditima.
Suma sumarum, da ameri hoće, učinili bi da kina klekne.
OK, takav potez bi uzdrmao i ameriku, ali bi kina otišla u helać.

User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18510 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 15:02

Ma uzdrmalo bi svijet. Sistem spojenih posuda, ali nastavilo bi se dalje opet.

Kod mene sve + i -, navika jbg. Troterovi radili i ja sto sam nekad radio.

walk_M-A-N
Posts: 2013
Joined: 09/05/2007 16:35

#18511 Re: IRAN

Post by walk_M-A-N » 29/05/2019 17:08

Image
Neki ubiše temu sa svojim prekobrojnim postovima u kojima ne možeš naći relevantnu informaciju ili korisno mišljenje.
Bolje bi bilo da se direktno dopisujete.

preporučujem:
https://washingtonsblog.com/2019/05/how ... asion.html
The Wall Street Journal headlined on May 27th,
“Iran’s Crude Buyers Jump Ship” and reported that “the country’s direct crude buyers have all but vanished, traders and executives in the Islamic Republic say. … China, India, Turkey, South Korea and Japan have ended all direct purchases of Iranian crude and condensates, they said.” Those buyers had “bought up to 1.6 million barrels a day of Iranian crude in March combined.” In China’s case, the decision to comply with Trump’s sanctions had not yet been known, until “When a Chinese-owned tanker loaded in Kharg in mid-May, it was widely interpreted as a resumption of Beijing’s crude purchases. But the tanker subsequently gave Indonesia as its destination,” and this indicated that the largest importer of oil from Iran, China, is now complying with the U.S. demand to stop trading with Iran. Now that Trump has cancelled all waivers, these countries have added themselves to the list of those which were already complying with the U.S. demand to stop importing Iranian oil. Furthermore, “Chinese companies are no longer buying Iranian crude, businessmen in Tehran say.” The U.S. and Saudi Arabia intend to be selling most of the oil that Iran previously had been selling but now is blocked from selling; so, at the same time as Iran gets strangulated by Trump’s sanctions, America and its chief ally, the Sauds, become further enriched by these sanctions.
The neoconservative Joseph Biden is probably benefiting more from his having supported neoconservatism, against Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc., than Sanders is benefiting from having opposed those invasions. In U.S. politics, the record shows that there is no gain to be won by opposing U.S. aggression. Sanctions are economic aggression: they are the first step toward an outright invasion. Between the sanctions and the invasions comes a crescendo of propaganda in order to whip up ‘patriotism’. It happened with Iraq. It happened with Syria. It happened with Nicaragua. And it could happen with Venezuela, Iran, Russia, China, and/or North Korea.
On May 13th, Reuters headlined “Iran insists on ramping up oil sales to stay in nuclear pact”
and reported that “EU officials … estimate Iran needs to sell 1.5 million bpd to keep its economy afloat. A drop below 1 million bpd could bring hardship and economic crisis.”
Prior to U.S. President Donald Trump’s cancellation of the nuclear deal with Iran and re-imposition of economic sanctions against Iran and against any companies that trade with Iran, Iran had been selling around 2 million bpd (barrels per day). So, the subtraction of “1.6 million barrels a day” would, alone, bring this down to 0.4 million bpd. It would be turning the screws so hard that the suffering of Iranians would be unbearable. But look at what Trump and a passive Congress are doing in Yemen, where the U.S. regime supplies the weaponry the training and the Saudis and UAE forces use them to slaughter as many Houthis as they can by bombing the food-supply route. Maybe just starving Iranians won’t seem to Americans to be that bad. American propaganda makes it all seem okay or even good and a necessary thing to do.
Furthermore, quoting again the May 13th article:
Once Europe’s biggest supplier, Iran has seen its exports gradually cut off from European buyers.
China – Iran’s largest oil customer with imports of 475,000 bpd in the first quarter of this year – has also stopped buying from Iran after Washington chose not to renew sanctions waivers.
Iran is being abandoned now, not only by America’s allies such as in Europe, but even in countries that had formerly been friendly toward Iran, such as China. Trump and Netanyahu are having their way. Iran is apparently trapped, by the two fascist regimes in U.S. and Israel (and not only by the Sauds, who also crave to destroy Iran).
On May 13th, the New York Times bannered
“White House Reviews Military Plans Against Iran, in Echoes of Iraq War”
and reported that Trump’s team had presented to the President “an updated military plan that envisions sending as many as 120,000 troops to the Middle East should Iran attack American forces or accelerate work on nuclear weapons.” The plan was not for a land-invasion but for an air-invasion: bombers and missiles.
If Russia abandons any of its allies, such as Iran and/or Venezuela, then the U.S. regime will have discredited Russia in the eyes of any remaining allied or even just friendly country, and this too could be part of Trump’s strategy — his expectation that Russia will abandon its allies if the U.S. regime invades one of Russia’s allies.
However, otherwise (in the event that Russia stands with and defends its allies), World War III seems likely.


User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18513 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 18:38

Prije ce bit Teheran-Banjaluka a ne ovako. :evil:

Walkmenu pola nas na ignoru. :lol: :thumbup:

User avatar
славянин
Posts: 11283
Joined: 30/05/2013 21:43
Location: Tuzla,Sarajevo i dalje :)

#18514 Re: IRAN

Post by славянин » 29/05/2019 18:41

Vizionar 1985 wrote:Prije ce bit Teheran-Banjaluka a ne ovako. :evil:

Walkmenu pola nas na ignoru. :lol: :thumbup:
A kuka dodo sarajevo kao teheran - sada otvara direkt avioliniju :D mehaba askerler :D

Sto covjek na forumu - na ignore sve pa onda pise i niko mu se ne kosi sa njegovim misljenjem :lol:

User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18515 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 18:43

However, otherwise (in the event that Russia stands with and defends its allies), World War III seems likely.
E bas ce zbog Irana izbit 3SR. Proksi rat neki je moguc mozda preko Irana. Ali slazem se s @Kikijem prije zeli Amerika rasparcati Iran.

User avatar
Sanjarko
Posts: 14395
Joined: 17/02/2015 19:32
Location: U snu

#18516 Re: IRAN

Post by Sanjarko » 29/05/2019 18:46

славянин wrote: A kuka dodo sarajevo kao teheran - sada otvara direkt avioliniju :D mehaba askerler :D

Sto covjek na forumu - na ignore sve pa onda pise i niko mu se ne kosi sa njegovim misljenjem :lol:
Ma dobro zaspamali smo temu zadnjih par strana, upravu je, ali to je car foruma. Ja ovdje nemam ni 30-tak postova. Tema aktivna pa zato se sad vise komentarise.

User avatar
salik79
Posts: 22722
Joined: 16/09/2013 13:15

#18517 Re: IRAN

Post by salik79 » 29/05/2019 19:15

Trump bi, kako je krenuo, na kraju, mogao zamoliti da ga pozovu na Bajram-namaz u Teheran. :lol:

Image

https://twitter.com/tictoc/status/11329 ... 47936?s=19

User avatar
Challenger_
Posts: 10358
Joined: 05/03/2013 21:09
Location: 永恆 - bez podrumskih entiteta i taketo-maketo koalicije
Contact:

#18518 Re: IRAN

Post by Challenger_ » 29/05/2019 19:20

Hihihi.

Donald, The Champion.

:nargila:

User avatar
jeza u ledja
Posts: 35812
Joined: 29/12/2005 01:20

#18519 Re: IRAN

Post by jeza u ledja » 29/05/2019 19:26

salik79 wrote:Trump bi, kako je krenuo, na kraju, mogao zamoliti da ga pozovu na Bajram-namaz u Teheran. :lol:

Image

https://twitter.com/tictoc/status/11329 ... 47936?s=19
Ovaj senator Chris Murphy mi je najbolji kongresmen sto se tice foreign policy. :thumbup:

User avatar
Kikibombona
Posts: 31385
Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48

#18520 Re: IRAN

Post by Kikibombona » 29/05/2019 19:37

Tramp nema blage veze o medjunarodnoj politici a ima dug jezik. Do sada je proklizao bezbroj puta.

Meni omiljeni ispad je bio vezano za Katar kada je Saudija katarski rezim oznacila kao glavnog spoznora terorizma. Odmah je uletio Tramp i ponovio isto. :D Pompeo i ostala ekipa su vjerovatno u tom trenutku udarala glavom od zid. Odmah je Pompeo izasao izjavom da je Katar prijatelj Amerike i tako korigovao predsjednika. :lol:

Isto tako je Tramp obecao Erdoganu da ce se povuci iz Sirije. Nije imao pojma o cemu se radi. Cijela administracija i Pentagon su bili u soku radi najavljene gluposti. I od toga je morao odustati.

Imao je mali milion gafova.

...

Medjunarodnu politiku vodi gospodin Pompeo i ekipa oko njega. Trampa ne treba uzimati previse ozbiljno. On je tu da zbunjuje protovnike. :D

User avatar
insomnia78
Posts: 62026
Joined: 03/04/2011 14:43

#18521 Re: IRAN

Post by insomnia78 » 29/05/2019 19:38

Joj sad kad šiitski doktori i inzinjeri navale u BL :lol:

User avatar
Kikibombona
Posts: 31385
Joined: 29/06/2013 08:48

#18522 Re: IRAN

Post by Kikibombona » 29/05/2019 19:46

insomnia78 wrote:Joj sad kad šiitski doktori i inzinjeri navale u BL :lol:
To je ta siitsko-pravoslavna konekcija.

User avatar
Nadzornik
Posts: 12203
Joined: 30/05/2011 12:25

#18523 Re: IRAN

Post by Nadzornik » 29/05/2019 19:52

insomnia78 wrote:Joj sad kad šiitski doktori i inzinjeri navale u BL :lol:

Za dva mjeseca Iranci ce biti vecina u Bihacu i okolici... :D

User avatar
Nadzornik
Posts: 12203
Joined: 30/05/2011 12:25

#18524 Re: IRAN

Post by Nadzornik » 29/05/2019 19:57

Kikibombona wrote:
To je ta siitsko-pravoslavna konekcija.
I Kurdi ce pozeljeti konekciju sa bilo kim ali nje biti nece.

User avatar
salik79
Posts: 22722
Joined: 16/09/2013 13:15

#18525 Re: IRAN

Post by salik79 » 29/05/2019 20:00

Obavezno pogledati izlaganja ovog cionistickog da'ije i uporediti ga (od retorike, pa nadalje) s onim likovima koje nam kiki redovno citira (a, u konacnici, s Bagdadijem). Ko pronadje (osim brade i uniforme) razliku, neka se javi:


Post Reply