Ma jok, sve što se Rusima ne dopadne.
Haj' ti prijatelju.
Ma jok, sve što se Rusima ne dopadne.
Maskiran američki marinci i foke, shvatili smo već. A Ukrajinci su nacisti.
Ovdje se varaš.
History
The Crimean interior has been ethnically diverse throughout its recorded history, changing hands numerous times, while the south coast was held continuously for most of the last two millennia by various Roman (and Eastern Roman) states. The interior was dominated by a succession of Scytho-Sarmatian, Gothic, Hunnic, Turkic, Mongol and Slavic conquests. Its south coast was Greek speaking first as Greek colonies (7th or 6th century BC and following), then under the Bosporan Kingdom (480 BC - 63 BC), Romans (47 BC -330 AD) and their successor states, the Byzantine Empire (330 AD - 1204 AD), the Empire of Trebizond (1204 AD - 1461 AD), and the independent Principality of Theodoro (1461 AD - 1475 AD). In 1475 the region was conquered by the Ottoman Turks. During the late Middle Ages a few coastal cities were ruled by Italian city states.
The Crimean Tatars emerged as a Turkic-speaking ethnic group native to Crimea in the early modern period, during the lifetime of the Crimean Khanate, and by the annexation of the Crimean Khanate by the Russian Empire in 1783, they formed the clear majority of Crimean population. The colonization "New Russia" (the Novorossiysk Governorate, of which the later Taurida Governorate formed a part) at the end of the 18th century was led by Prince Grigori Potemkin who was granted the powers of an absolute ruler over the area by Catherine the Great. The lands were generously given to the Russian dvoryanstvo (nobility), and the enserfed peasantry mostly from Ukraine and fewer from Russia were transferred to cultivate what was a sparsely populated steppe. Catherine the Great also invited European settlers to these newly conquered lands: Germans, Poles, Italians, and others. Crimea is geographically and demographically divided into three regions, the steppe interior, the mountains, and the coast. The Tatars were the predominant portion of the population in the mountainous area and about half of the steppe population, while Russians were concentrated most heavily in the Feodosiya district. Germans and Bulgarians settled in the Crimea at the beginning of the 19th century, receiving a large allotment and fertile land. Wealthy colonists later bought substantial portions of land, mainly in Perekopsky and Yevpatoria districts.
1795 - 156 400 people (87.6% of Crimean Tatars, 4.3% of Russians, 1.9% of Greeks, 1.7% of Roma, 1.5% of Karaites, 1.3% of Ukrainians, 0.8% of Jews, 0.6% Armenians, 0.1% Germans, 0.1% Bulgarians)[ source unspecified 692 days ]
1816 - 212 600 people (85.9% Crimean Tatars, 4.8% Russians, 3.7% Ukrainians, 1.4% Karaites, 1.3% Armenians, 0.9% Jews, 0.8% Greeks, 0.7% Germans, 0.4% Bulgarians)
1835 - 279,400 people (83.5% of Crimean Tatars, 4.4% of Russians, 3.1% of Ukrainians, 2.4% of Roma, 2% of Greeks, 1.5% of Armenians, 1.1% of Karaites, 0, 9% Jews, 0.7% Germans, 0.4% Bulgarians)
1850 - 343,500 people (77.8% of Crimean Tatars, 7% of Ukrainians, 6.6% of Russians, 2% of Greeks, 1.9% of Gypsies, 1.3% of Karaites, 1% of Armenians, 1% of Germans, 0, 9% Jews, 0.5% Bulgarians)
1858 - 331,300 people (73% of Crimean Tatars, 12.6% of Russians, 4% of Ukrainians, 2.4% of Greeks, 2% of Roma, 1.8% of Jews, 1.5% of Germans, 1.3% of Armenians, 0.8% Karaites, 0.6% Bulgarians)
1864 - 198,700 people (50.3% Crimean Tatars, 28.5% Russians and Ukrainians, 6.5% Greeks, 5.3% Jews, 2.9% Armenians, 2.7% Germans, 1.7% Karaites, 1.6% Bulgarians
1897 - 546,700 people (35.6% Crimean Tatars, 33.1% Russians, 11.8% Ukrainians, 5.8% Germans, 4.4% Jews, 3.1% Greeks, 1.5% Armenians, 1.3% Bulgarians, 1.2% Poles, 0.3% Turks) [74]
1917 - 749 800 people (41.2% Russians, 28.7% Crimean Tatars, 8.6% Ukrainians, 6.4% Jews, 4.9% Germans, 2.9% Greeks, 1.6% Armenians, 1.4% Bulgarians, 0.8% Poles, 0.7% Turks)
1920 - 718,900 people (44.1% Russians, 26% Crimean Tatars, 7.4% Ukrainians, 6.7% Jews, 5.9% Germans, 3.3% Greeks, 1.7% Armenians, 1, 5% Bulgarians, 0.8% Karaites, 0.8% Poles)
1926 - 706 800 people (42.7% Russians, 25.3% Crimean Tatars, 11.0% Ukrainians, 6.2% Germans, 5.5% Jews, 2.4% Greeks, 1.5% Armenians, 1.6% Bulgarians, 0.6% Karaites, 0.6% Poles, 0.9% Krymchaks) [75]
1934 - 832,000 people (44% Russians, 23.8% Crimean Tatars, 10.9% Ukrainians, 8.1% Jews, 6.1% Germans, 1.7% Armenians, 1.4% Bulgarians)
1937 - 996 800 people (47.7% Russians, 20.7% Crimean Tatars, 12.9% Ukrainians, 5.5% Jews, 5.1% Germans, 2.2% Greeks, 1.5% Bulgarians, 0.3% Karaites)
1939 - 1,123,800 people (49.6% Russians, 19.4% Crimean Tatars, 13.7% Ukrainians, 5.8% Jews, 4.5% Germans, 1.8% Greeks, 1.4% Bulgarians , 1.1% Armenians, 0.5% Poles) [76]
1944 (end of summer) - 379,000 people (75% Russians, 21% Ukrainians)
1959 - 1 201 500 people (71.4% of Russians, 22.3% of Ukrainians, 2.1% of Jews, 1.8% of Belarusians, 0.5% of Bulgarians, 0.3% of Poles) [77] [94] During the intercensal period, significant changes took place in the population of the peninsula, the reasons for which were the Great Patriotic War , which brought significant population losses, as well as the criminal and illegal [95] deportation of the Crimean peoples carried out during the war years (the Crimean Tatars were the most numerous of the deported peoples ). Such a significant increase in the population for such a short period is associated with the massive organized resettlement of residents to Crimea from various regions of the USSR (mainly from the RSFSR(residents of Krasnodar, Voronezh, Kursk, Oryol and Belgorod regions)), many of today's descendants of immigrants consider themselves Crimeans. Immigrants from the regions of the Soviet Union were given a one-time cash allowance of 2,500 rubles per family, wrote off all debts and taxes, and were allowed to take inventory, livestock and other property with a total weight of up to two tons per family. Families in particular need were provided with linen, clothing and footwear. Families were transported in railway passenger cars. The settlers were settled in the vacated houses of the Crimean Tatars. This is how Ekaterina Klochkova, one of the collective farmers of the Voronezh region, recalls that time
I tako se treba podjeliti?exliberal-ex wrote: ↑06/12/2021 00:53 Kad pricamo o Majdanu, ko je stajao iza organizovanja i ko je kontrolisao medije....
hint
Jedan od "vlasnika" je iz Srbije, znate li na cijem su platnom spisku?
Ukrajina me podsjeca na srbiju i hrvatsku , zapadni dio je uvijek naginjao prema njemackoj ( u WWII su se pridruzili njemackim okupacionim snagama i njihove snage su pravile zlocine po bjelorusij), dok je istocni dio ukljucujuci i krim vise proruski
Hahaha, koja si ti legendaCapljina74 wrote: ↑05/12/2021 20:02Taj dio Luganska i dobar dio Donjecka su naselili srpski pukovi razočarani habsburškom komandom i žrtvovanjem istih.
Srbi vazda prave sranja...
Jebiga, jaci tlaci.
Ja, kako u ŠveCke?Point. wrote: ↑06/12/2021 09:55 Nekad davno Krim pripadao Ruskoj Federaciji pa tom logikom mogu upasti u drugu, suverenu državu i uzeti dio. Kakva nakaradna logika. Vodeći se tim, šta bi država bi posebno u Evropi, moglo upadati u druge države i uzimati dijelove teritorija koje im je nekad u prošlosti pripadalo.
Ništa ne može opravdati rusko miješanje u unutrašnje stvari Ukrajine i aneksiranja dijela njene teritorije.
Odrasti. Dosadan si sa tim dječijim upadicama.Capljina74 wrote: ↑06/12/2021 12:24Ja, kako u ŠveCke?Point. wrote: ↑06/12/2021 09:55 Nekad davno Krim pripadao Ruskoj Federaciji pa tom logikom mogu upasti u drugu, suverenu državu i uzeti dio. Kakva nakaradna logika. Vodeći se tim, šta bi država bi posebno u Evropi, moglo upadati u druge države i uzimati dijelove teritorija koje im je nekad u prošlosti pripadalo.
Ništa ne može opravdati rusko miješanje u unutrašnje stvari Ukrajine i aneksiranja dijela njene teritorije.
Hladno, al' jebi ga standard!
Transnistrijanci su ludji od Rusa i Sjevernokoreanaca.studiorum_tuzlaensis wrote: ↑06/12/2021 14:06
U Transistriji (Moldavija) iskrsla nova paravojna formacija.
Mogla bi biti Rusija do ušća Dunava kako je krenulo.
Horvat je sa svojim pukom prvi naselio zemlju i nazvao je Novoserbija, a onda su Šević i Preradović došli u izvidnicu i pokačili se sa Horvatom (srpska klasika po kojoj vidiš da nije laž), zapalili u Moskvu i dobili zemlju oko Luganska koju nazivaju Slavjanoserbija, glavni grad i dalje postoji, sada je predgrađe i zove se Slavjanoserbsk. Dva husarska puka.HarTar wrote: ↑06/12/2021 10:18Hahaha, koja si ti legendaCapljina74 wrote: ↑05/12/2021 20:02
Taj dio Luganska i dobar dio Donjecka su naselili srpski pukovi razočarani habsburškom komandom i žrtvovanjem istih.
Srbi vazda prave sranja...![]()
Rusija je uradila sto je Turska na Cipru i sad u Sirij, a takodjer koliko se god vama to svidjalo ili ne i ono sto je Amerika uradila na Kosovu ...cijenu je platila Ukrajina.Point. wrote: ↑06/12/2021 09:55 Nekad davno Krim pripadao Ruskoj Federaciji pa tom logikom mogu upasti u drugu, suverenu državu i uzeti dio. Kakva nakaradna logika. Vodeći se tim, šta bi država bi posebno u Evropi, moglo upadati u druge države i uzimati dijelove teritorija koje im je nekad u prošlosti pripadalo.
Ništa ne može opravdati rusko miješanje u unutrašnje stvari Ukrajine i aneksiranja dijela njene teritorije.
Bosna i Ukrajina su najvece zemlje pacenice u povijestiexliberal-ex wrote: ↑06/12/2021 18:55Rusija je uradila sto je Turska na Cipru i sad u Sirij, a takodjer koliko se god vama to svidjalo ili ne i ono sto je Amerika uradila na Kosovu ...cijenu je platila Ukrajina.Point. wrote: ↑06/12/2021 09:55 Nekad davno Krim pripadao Ruskoj Federaciji pa tom logikom mogu upasti u drugu, suverenu državu i uzeti dio. Kakva nakaradna logika. Vodeći se tim, šta bi država bi posebno u Evropi, moglo upadati u druge države i uzimati dijelove teritorija koje im je nekad u prošlosti pripadalo.
Ništa ne može opravdati rusko miješanje u unutrašnje stvari Ukrajine i aneksiranja dijela njene teritorije.
Sto se tica napada, neko se bez razmisljanja nasmijao kad su rekli da rusi cekaju Januar ..a januar najbolja opcija za rat, zemlja zaledjena motorizovane jedinice se mogu koristit na svakom terenu nema potrebe da se krecu samo cestama, nema prirodne zastite jer je sve gologuzo, nemozes se posteno ni ukopat .
Srbija do TokijaCapljina74 wrote: ↑06/12/2021 16:59Horvat je sa svojim pukom prvi naselio zemlju i nazvao je Novoserbija, a onda su Šević i Preradović došli u izvidnicu i pokačili se sa Horvatom (srpska klasika po kojoj vidiš da nije laž), zapalili u Moskvu i dobili zemlju oko Luganska koju nazivaju Slavjanoserbija, glavni grad i dalje postoji, sada je predgrađe i zove se Slavjanoserbsk. Dva husarska puka.
Horvat i njegove su Tatari zatrli u pohodu, bukvalno sve i žene i djecu nisu uzimali u roblje što je neobično za njih, a ova druga dva puka su ih dočekali i uz pojačanje ruske vojske uzeli Krim koji je od tada sastavni dio Rusije.
Tako da jeste,
Fakat ovo su Srbi zasrali sve.
To je trajalo jednu deceniju dok nisu Tatari prestali biti opasnost i dok se nisu granice pomjerile. Poslužili su Rusima pravo, ali ih tada Katarina II ukida i priključuje gubernijama.
Šančevi, tvrđave koji su sada gradovi:
1. četa – šanac Serebrjanski (u DNR);
2. četa – šanac Vergunski (danas – jedan od najstarijih rejona Luganska);
3. četa – šanac Verhnji-Beljenjki (danas grad Verhnji na obodu Lisičanska);
4. četa – šanac Krasnij Jar (danas – jedan od najstarijih rejona Luganska);
5. četa – Privolje;
6. četa – šanac Krimske Jame (selo Krimsko);
7. četa – Njižnjeje;
8. četa – Podgornoje (zatim – Donjeck, danas – Slavjanoserbsk);
9. četa – Žoltoje;
10. četa – šanac Kameni, Kameni Brod (danas – jedan od najstarijih rejona Luganska);
11. četa – Čerkaski Jar (selo Čerkasko);
12. četa – Harošij Jar (selo Harošeje);
13. četa – Kalinovskoje;
14. četa – Korotomišski (Trojicki);
15-16. četa – šanac Luganski (danas – zaselak Luganski kraj izvora reke Luganj u DNR).
Reuf Bajrović