A ja ti neću odgovoriti. Ja sam legalista.
Danasnji "feminizam"
- MarlboroGold
- Posts: 21580
- Joined: 24/06/2013 17:14
- Location: Chaos Sanctuary
#28102 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Naravno. Za abortus kao sredstvo kontracepcije na osnovu samovoljne odluke žene koja je u odnosu sa partnerom, u slučaju da je njegovo pravo na potomstvo povrijeđeno i da može snositi teške posljedice po pitanju psihe i ostalog, takva vrsta naknade je neki minimum i što bi vodilo ka pravoj ravnopravnosti i jednakopravnosti u ovom segmentu. To bi, naravno, trebalo i dokazati na sudu.vjeshalica wrote: ↑29/06/2022 10:18Ahhh radije bi obestecenje jer je jednostavnije imati navodne dusevne bolove, nego podizati sam dEte. Jedostavnije, a obije strane pomalo zadovoljne.MarlboroGold wrote: ↑29/06/2022 00:04 Ne, već neka izvrši abortus, ali će plaćati naknadu bivšem partneru za duševnu bol koju mu je nanijela u nekom procentu alimentacije u obrnutom slučaju. Može i ovo.
Bez ovakvih mehanizama muškarac će uvijek biti donji koliko god da je to nekim osobama smiješno i koliko god da ovo uzdižu na nekakav distopijski scenario poput Handmaid's Tale, a abortusa iz naprijed navedenog razloga je sve više i više.
- konoplja
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: 12/09/2018 19:31
#28103 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Ne jer doktor ima pravo da odbije gotovo svugdje u Europi. Zakonski.Hakiz wrote: ↑29/06/2022 11:34
Ako neko ima zakonsko pravo na nešto, a ti si pružalac te usluge moraš je pružiti, bez obzira na lični stav. Nepružanje usluga bez zakonom odobrenih razloga dovodi ljude i firme do gubljenja licenci i prava na obavljanje te djelatnosti. Imao sam razlog da to provjerim pa sam dobio odgovore od pravnika za to pitanje, ne govorim napamet.
U suprotnom bi ti ušla u moju prodavnicu a ja odbio da te uslužim, imam prigovor savjesti na prodaju ženama ili ljudima te boje očiju itd. To se ne smije dozvoliti, zato zakon kaže da ako nisi opasnost po druge mušterije ili mene kao pružaoca usluga zbog bolesti, toksikološkog stanja, nehigijene i sličnog, ne smijem odbiti da ti pružim uslugu. Mogu mi zatvoriti radnju.
Korupcija ili to što vlasti ne sankcionišu one koji ne pružaju usluge pod raznim izgovorima, pa i prigovorom savjesti je druga priča.
Tako da, ako je abortus na ženin zahtjev, bez pitanja, zakonom fozvoljen, doktor koji ga zbog prigovora savjesti odbije bi trebao izgubiti licencu.
Kao što rekoh, kada pokušaš posasti doktor razmisli o prigovoru savjesti. Ako se savjest razvije bakon što si postao doktor, mijenjaj profesiju ili barem oblast unutar profesije. Valjda je poenta savjesti u tome da zbog nje podneseš neke neugodnosti. Promjena profesije, gubljenje licence, zatvor, gubitak života, to sve neko ko ima savjest treba prihvatiti kao njenu moguću cijenu.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscient ... o_abortion
- konoplja
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: 12/09/2018 19:31
#28104 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
To je taj konundrum. Ljudi koji prema svojoj profesiji trebaju da daju zivot sada ga oduzimaju.Niemand wrote: ↑29/06/2022 11:21Ma ono sto mene zanima, ako doktore treba natjerati da rade abortuse i kada oni ne zele, a npr abortusi u usa najcesce nisu uopste iz zdravstvenih razloga, pretpostavljam da je slicno i u ostalim zemljama:konoplja wrote: ↑29/06/2022 00:19
Rogovi i slicno bi spadali pod ovaj dio psiholog, zeleno svjetlo, iskrivljena slika.
Bolji primjer i vezan za feminizam je doktor koji odbije pripisati hormone djetetu ili operaciju izvrsiti.
Onako kao sidenote: plasticna kirurgija se generalno dijeli na estetsku i rekonstrukcijsku. Esteticari kaljaju reputaciju plasticara ovim potonjim.
dakle ne tjeras ti tu doktora da nekome spasava zivot i slicno, sta se onda jos moze natjerati doktore i kad doktor uopste moze reci ne?An elective abortion is the interruption of a pregnancy before the 20th week of gestation at the woman’s request for reasons other than maternal health or fetal disease. Most abortions in the United States are performed for this reason.
https://www.britannica.com/science/elective-abortion
Te plasticne operacije takodjer vecinom nisu stvar zdravstvenih razloga.
Kontam ja da natjeras doktora da nekome spasava zivot, ali ne razumijem na osnovu cega ces ih natjerati ako nisu zdravstveni razlozi u pitanju.
Uzeti u obzir da ja jos od pandemije ne shvatam ko tu pije a ko placa kad pricamo o medicini opcenito i stvarno mi nije jasno kad doktor moze reci ne.
-
- Posts: 7944
- Joined: 31/03/2014 01:55
#28105 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Academics and midwives on June 27 submitted a petition to the health ministry demanding the removal of a legal clause that requires pregnant women to obtain the consent of their spouses to have abortions.
The petition, containing about 82,000 signatures, was organized by a group called Action for Safe Abortion Japan.
It argues that the clause in the Maternal Health Law robs women of their right to make decisions about their own bodies.
The law states that women can have an abortion only when it is physically or financially difficult to continue with the pregnancy or to give birth, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape and in certain other cases.
If pregnant women meet these conditions, their doctors must obtain consent from both the woman and her spouse, including common-law marriage partners, to perform an abortion.
Japan is among only around 10 countries or regions that require a spouse’s consent for a woman to have an abortion.
The United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has recommended that Japan remove the clause from the law, but the government has not held advanced discussions on revising the legislation.
In addition, a health ministry official said at a Diet session in May that as a general rule, pregnant women will be required to obtain consent from their spouses to take an abortion pill in compliance with the Maternal Health Law.
The ministry is currently assessing whether to approve what would be Japan’s first oral abortion medication.
The ministry official’s statement caused a backlash on social media, with people questioning why women are not allowed to decide on their own even about taking medication.
“Women have a right to a safe abortion,” said Kumi Tsukahara, a member of Action for Safe Abortion Japan and a part-time lecturer of gender studies at Kanazawa University. “In Japan, the general rule is that women cannot have an abortion without their spouses’ consent. It is wrong that women cannot make a decision about something that involves their own bodies.”
She said a health ministry official responded to the petition by saying, “The public, too, has various opinions (about the issue).”
Other organizations also voiced concerns about the spousal consent requirement for taking the abortion pill.
Kaori Nakajima, a midwife and representative director of nonprofit organization Piccolare, noted that not all pregnant women have a good relationship with their unborn babies’ fathers.
“I want the government to take into account cases in which pregnant women and their spouses have different views, or their spouses are not willing to sign the consent form for the abortion.”
https://www.asahi.com/sp/ajw/articles/14655669
- konoplja
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: 12/09/2018 19:31
#28106 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Ne znam. Ima slicnosti. Sigurno je da su pogrjesili mnogo puta i zajebali sa uranjenim intervencijama.
S tim da je to "promjena spola".
- konoplja
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: 12/09/2018 19:31
#28107 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Znaci krenuti dobro naplacivati abortus sa obaveznim dozivotnim psiholoskim sesijama.Seawolf wrote: ↑29/06/2022 01:11Kudikamo lakše savjest prigovori zbog pobačaja koji se ne može naplatiti, nego zbog transformacije spolnih organa i hormonalne terapije za koje se veliki novci mogu uzeti.konoplja wrote: ↑29/06/2022 00:19 Rogovi i slicno bi spadali pod ovaj dio psiholog, zeleno svjetlo, iskrivljena slika.
Bolji primjer i vezan za feminizam je doktor koji odbije pripisati hormone djetetu ili operaciju izvrsiti.
Onako kao sidenote: plasticna kirurgija se generalno dijeli na estetsku i rekonstrukcijsku. Esteticari kaljaju reputaciju plasticara ovim potonjim.
-
- Posts: 5725
- Joined: 01/12/2020 00:58
#28108 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Koliko vidim ova tema, skupa sa temom "đe na more ove godine", služi najviše za razna naprđivanja
-
- Posts: 40542
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#28109 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
To je kompromis religijama, a (samo) moje mišljenje je da je to pogrešno. Ako nećeš obaviti abortus, nemoj se upuštati u tu oblast medicine. To bi bilo pošteno.konoplja wrote: ↑29/06/2022 12:01Ne jer doktor ima pravo da odbije gotovo svugdje u Europi. Zakonski.Hakiz wrote: ↑29/06/2022 11:34
Ako neko ima zakonsko pravo na nešto, a ti si pružalac te usluge moraš je pružiti, bez obzira na lični stav. Nepružanje usluga bez zakonom odobrenih razloga dovodi ljude i firme do gubljenja licenci i prava na obavljanje te djelatnosti. Imao sam razlog da to provjerim pa sam dobio odgovore od pravnika za to pitanje, ne govorim napamet.
U suprotnom bi ti ušla u moju prodavnicu a ja odbio da te uslužim, imam prigovor savjesti na prodaju ženama ili ljudima te boje očiju itd. To se ne smije dozvoliti, zato zakon kaže da ako nisi opasnost po druge mušterije ili mene kao pružaoca usluga zbog bolesti, toksikološkog stanja, nehigijene i sličnog, ne smijem odbiti da ti pružim uslugu. Mogu mi zatvoriti radnju.
Korupcija ili to što vlasti ne sankcionišu one koji ne pružaju usluge pod raznim izgovorima, pa i prigovorom savjesti je druga priča.
Tako da, ako je abortus na ženin zahtjev, bez pitanja, zakonom fozvoljen, doktor koji ga zbog prigovora savjesti odbije bi trebao izgubiti licencu.
Kao što rekoh, kada pokušaš posasti doktor razmisli o prigovoru savjesti. Ako se savjest razvije bakon što si postao doktor, mijenjaj profesiju ili barem oblast unutar profesije. Valjda je poenta savjesti u tome da zbog nje podneseš neke neugodnosti. Promjena profesije, gubljenje licence, zatvor, gubitak života, to sve neko ko ima savjest treba prihvatiti kao njenu moguću cijenu.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscient ... o_abortion
Vidi kako su to Česi elegantno riješili:
Ako nećeš ti MORAŠ me uputiti doktoru koji hoće.But if a doctor refuse to perform an abortion they have to refer the patient to another doctor who can perform it.
-
- Posts: 7944
- Joined: 31/03/2014 01:55
#28110 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Sa japanom je zanimljivo i da su dozvolili abortus prije recimo usa pa je tih godina cvjetao "abortus turizam" za sta je japan tada zestoko kritikovan. Ima po netu prica zena koje su putovale tada u japan na abortus:Abortion in Japan is only allowed under a term limit of 22 weeks if a continued pregnancy or birth will lead to the endangerment to the health of the pregnant woman or economic hardship. Chapter XXIX of the Penal Code of Japan makes abortion de jure illegal in the country. Exceptions to the prohibition of abortion are regulated by the Maternal Health Protection Law that allows approved doctors to practice abortion on a woman with the consent of her spouse needed if she is married, if the pregnancy was the result of rape or if the continuation of the pregnancy endangers the maternal health because of physical or economic reasons. Anyone trying to practice abortion without the consent of the woman will be prosecuted, including the doctors.
...
After World War II, Japan found itself in a population crisis. In 1946, 10 million people were declared at risk of starvation, and between the years 1945 and 1950, the population increased by 11 million. In 1948, in the wake of the Miyuki Ishikawa case, Japan legalized abortion under special circumstances. The Eugenic Protection Law of 1948 made Japan one of the first countries to legalize induced abortion. In 1949, a revision passed which provided abortion in the case of extreme physical or economic distress to the mother. A further stipulation was added in 1952 requiring that the mother meet an economic threshold of poor living conditions to obtain an abortion. The whole law was revised as the Maternal Body Protection Law in 1996.
...
Overall, in 2019, the total number of abortions officially reported was 156,430, representing a 56 percent decrease from the number reported for 2000. The overall abortion rate changed from 22.3 to 15.3 abortions per 1,000 live births over the same period. Going further back, there were 598,084 abortions in 1980 and 1,063,256 in 1960. In 2019, 49 abortions were reported for women aged 13 and under, and a further 3,904 for women aged 14–17. Some 39,805 abortions were performed on women aged 20-24.
According to researchers, in more than 99 percent of cases, the reason reported for performing an abortion was to protect the woman's health; this percentage remained constant during 1975–1995. The same researchers also suggest that while official figures may be lower than the true rate of abortion due to under-reporting by doctors in order to lower tax bills and protect patient identities, trends may be "reasonably accurate".
...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Japan
...
Perhaps with a lot of investigation we could have found somewhere safe and legal closer to home, but Japan was an immediate option. It was easy to arrange and far more discreet an option than asking around as my pregnancy progressed.
My sister called my brother who was at Dartmouth at the time and had heard of a travel agency that managed [planning trips to Japan for abortions] in Seattle. [Editor’s note: Abortion in the early months of pregnancy wasn’t legalized in Washington State until 1970; “One Seattle travel agency specialized in arranging trips to Japan, where, for $1,000, a woman could obtain a safe, legal abortion, in a four-day stay that included one day for sightseeing.”]
...
https://www.thecut.com/2017/02/at-16-my ... rtion.html
In 1968, 17-year-old Alyson Williams-Cheung embarked on a three-day trip to Japan. She wandered Ginza, an upscale shopping district in Tokyo, wearing the stylish mini dresses of the era and window shopping for kimonos and tea sets. She also got an abortion. “I don’t even remember feeling any stress,” said Williams-Cheung, now a retired nurse and mother. “I think it was more: This is what you have to do. In the middle of a hurricane, this is what you have to do.” Williams-Cheung was one of thousands who, prior to the passing of Roe v. Wade, traveled to places like Japan, Sweden, and Great Britain where abortion was legal and safe.
...
Although travel agencies around the country offered abortion deals, which often included sightseeing, they were only available for those with financial resources and social networks to support the cost and time away from responsibilities. SHA’s document on “rush” Japanese abortion trips leaving from San Francisco includes tips for negotiating with doctors, such as telling them “you are a student or a poor working girl and don’t have much money.”
...
https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/trav ... d-roe-wade
-
- Posts: 16354
- Joined: 14/03/2008 21:14
#28111 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
-
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
- Location: bosansko jajčno mesto
#28112 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Prisiljavanje zene, od strane muskarca, na abortus, ili na porod, je neprihvatljivo.MarlboroGold wrote: ↑29/06/2022 00:21Kako se dogovore ili kako sud naloži kad se svi faktori uzmu u obzir. Određena cifra, pa moRe na rate ili odmah u kešu bez obzira nađe li u međuvremenu drugu partnericu. Duševna bol je duševna bol.
Šipak vazektomija tog tipa kad postoje sredstva za kontracepciju, a ako ti nisu dostupna onda treba dobro razmisliti je li vrijedno, jer nema kajanja kasnije. Šta drugo da čojk kaže na to?
Prije će zaživjeti ovo moje
Trazite zene koje zele djecu sa vama.
- Bloo
- Globalna šefica
- Posts: 50441
- Joined: 16/01/2008 23:03
- Location: Korriban
#28113 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
sumirao čovjek
-
- Posts: 40542
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#28114 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Od strane žene je prihvatljivo?KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:29
Prisiljavanje zene, od strane muskarca, na abortus, ili na porod, je neprihvatljivo.
- dale cooper
- Posts: 28477
- Joined: 03/04/2007 09:55
- Location: Twin Peaks/Red Room
- MarlboroGold
- Posts: 21580
- Joined: 24/06/2013 17:14
- Location: Chaos Sanctuary
#28116 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Nemojte Karlinku svega vam quotati kad se meni obraća da ne moram čitati šta piše.
-
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
- Location: bosansko jajčno mesto
#28117 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Da, jer to je njeno tijelo. Muskarac nije vlasnik njenog tijela.Hakiz wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:42Od strane žene je prihvatljivo?KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:29
Prisiljavanje zene, od strane muskarca, na abortus, ili na porod, je neprihvatljivo.
Zato pazljivo birajte sa kim zelite djete.
- Bloo
- Globalna šefica
- Posts: 50441
- Joined: 16/01/2008 23:03
- Location: Korriban
-
- Posts: 40542
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#28119 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Prisiljavanje žene od strane žene je prihvatljivo?KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:54Da, jer to je njeno tijelo. Muskarac nije vlasnik njenog tijela.
Zato pazljivo birajte sa kim zelite djete.
Govorila si da je prisiljavanje od strane muškarca neprihvatljivo, a od strane žene?
- MarlboroGold
- Posts: 21580
- Joined: 24/06/2013 17:14
- Location: Chaos Sanctuary
#28120 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
-
- Posts: 17286
- Joined: 11/12/2012 13:21
-
- Posts: 40542
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#28122 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
U cjelini.
Normalno.
-
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
- Location: bosansko jajčno mesto
#28123 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Nisam te razumjela, a u tom slucaju, odgovor je isti, nema priziljavanja zene ni od strane druge zene.Hakiz wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:56Prisiljavanje žene od strane žene je prihvatljivo?KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:54
Da, jer to je njeno tijelo. Muskarac nije vlasnik njenog tijela.
Zato pazljivo birajte sa kim zelite djete.
Govorila si da je prisiljavanje od strane muškarca neprihvatljivo, a od strane žene?
-
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: 02/06/2021 10:04
- Location: bosansko jajčno mesto
#28124 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
MarlboroGold wrote: ↑29/06/2022 18:57ma smara ženska i na drugim forumima... nije to konkretno u vezi ove priče
Ti ozenjen sa malim djeteom pises po forumima svaki dan, ja pisem povremeno na ovom.
-
- Posts: 40542
- Joined: 30/07/2015 20:01
#28125 Re: Danasnji "feminizam"
Ali si naglasila muškarce. Slučajno.KraljicaIzJajca wrote: ↑29/06/2022 19:05Nisam te razumjela, a u tom slucaju, odgovor je isti, nema priziljavanja zene ni od strane druge zene.