ja o ploci kao ploci nisam rekao da je prednost nego sam zvukdale cooper wrote: ↑27/01/2022 17:07Ali i ti isto zaboravljaš da same limitacije vinila kao nosača zvuka onemogućuju puno iskorištavanje ovog opsega frekvencija koje sifoxlife wrote: ↑27/01/2022 16:59
db i nisu bas znacajni ako gledamo kvalitet
sljedece oko signal to noise ratio se mozemo sloziti da je bolji kod cd-a
al si preskocio najbitnije frekvenciju koju cd ima i jedinu prednost u tome je od 0 do 20khz od 20 do 22.5 je isto a sve iznad je prednost ploce
ps. nasao sam i tekst odakle si skinuo
al si vjesto zaboravio ili namjerno izostavio ovu recenicu
the breaking down of music into binary data can never match the smooth and continuous nature of analog vinyl. Just like a million little square pixels can never make a perfect curve in a picture if you look closely enough.
naveo. One se teoretski mogu postići, ali u praksi to nije baš tako.
https://www.vox.com/2014/4/19/5626058/v ... r-than-cdsThere are built-in problems with using vinyl as a data encoding mechanisms that have no CD equivalent. Vinyl is physically limited by the fact that records have to be capable of being played without skipping or causing distortion. That both limits the dynamic range — the difference between the loudest and softest note — and the range of pitches (or "frequencies") you can hear.
If notes get too low in pitch, that means less audio can fit in a given amount of vinyl. If notes are too high, the stylus has difficulty tracking them, causing distortion. So engineers mastering for vinyl often cut back on extreme high or low ends, using a variety of methods, all of which alter the music.
to da li moze stati na plocu fizicki je druga prica
ja cisto govorim o zvuku kao zvuku i kvalitetu istog
tako da je u tom slucaju ploca bolja
e sada posto cd ima te prednosti koje nabrajas naravno da su se ljudi opredijelili za cd jer je i digitano i svasta nesto tj naprednije od ploce
a tu nema sumnje da ce zbog toga ljudi generalno se odreci i kvaliteta zvuka u korist tih prednosti