sinuhe wrote:Suma nestaje svakako i pod drzavom samo sto drzava nista ne ulaze. U BiH se radi o sprezi drzave i muljatora. Drzava nikako nije dobar vlasnik. U tim nepristupacnim predjelima moze samo rasti suma pa bolje da se neko brine o njoj, bolje i da se zimi nalozi, nego ovako da nestane u po ljeta.
Cista demagogija. Daj nam primjere iz BiH i ostatka Balkana gdje privatnik racionalno gazduje sumom ne unistavajuci je prekomjernom eksploatacijom i neselektivnom sjecom!
Jel privatnici imaju svoje kanadere i helikoptere, pumpe i cisterne kojima gase pozare na svojim gazdinstvima?
Shuplja neokapitalisticka!
Tako je u Americi na snazi manijakalna pomama za privatizacijom, izmedju ostalog, i suma pa su tim demagozima lijepo ljudi shuknuli prosle godine kad su se u jeku stogodisnjih pozara svi fatali za DRZAVU tj. vatrogasce i njihovu opremu
Tipicni sablon neoliberalnih kapitalista - resursi i profit u privatne ruke a troskovi i rashodi na pleca drustva/drzave.
Odgovori ti meni na pitanje zasto nisu privatne korporacije same prosle godine gasile te pozare vec svi zazivali drzavnu tj. federalnu pomoc(USA) i vatrogasce???
"And at these moments, another thing that’s missing from these discussions is not just the word "climate change," but the words "public sector."
I mean, who’s out there fighting these fires? It’s the public sector, you know? Where do people go when there are these cooling centers? It’s the
public sector. It’s public schools, which are currently being privatized in Philadelphia. This assault on the public sector must be linked to climate change. So, in the face of extreme weather, I think that there really is—you know, we have to embrace the fact that U.S. capitalism is essentially a mixed economy already. We have 35 percent of the GDP is government activity. This is a right-wing talking point. Many on the left don’t even discuss it, but that’s a tool we can use.
AMY GOODMAN: Vermont is a perfect example of this.
CHRISTIAN PARENTI: Yes. And last year we had Hurricane Irene dumped a lot rain on Vermont. And people came together on a voluntary basis, communities, but also the state government was there with lots of aid, levels of aid that far outstrip the great generosity of Vermont businesses by, you know, factors of three, four, five. And in these moments, we have to recognize that we are all connected and that one of the most important institutions for managing these types of crises is the public sector and that we cannot fire public workers, we cannot dismantle the state, and that it is clearly not always efficient and—inefficient and corrupt. It actually does lots and lots of valuable things.
And, you know, I’ll bet you what’s going to happen later in the summer is that FEMA is going to come under attack again. That’s what happened at the end of last summer, right? The right wing turned on FEMA. They said they were spending too much. Well, they’re spending too much because disasters have, you know, gone—they’ve doubled. The number of declared disasters have doubled in the last 20 years, like 99 last year. So, the GOP is trying to strip FEMA’s budget. Why do they hate FEMA so much? If you actually look into what FEMA does, it makes perfect sense why the right hates FEMA. Same reason they hate Social Security. Because it works. Because it’s a public agency that helps redistribute wealth to people in need. And it does all sorts of things that are essential to the people who are affected by disasters and to the regional economies that need to recover."
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/7/3/cl ... _sustained
.
:
