Znaci smjerovi poput ovog o kojemu pricamo, ne postoje:
http://www.advokat-prnjavorac.com/prizn ... esude.html
National Report on Residual Jurisdiction
Denmark
2
Due to the general Danish opt-out of all measur
es in the area of justice, Denmark is not
bound by Council Regulation 44/2001. Denmark
and the EC have entered into an agreement
on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial
matters and the agreement enters into force on
July 1, 2007. Hence, for the time being
Denmark remains a contracting party to
the 1968 Brussels Convention.
In view of this, I have replaced "the Brussels I regulation" with "the 1968 Brussels
Convention" in the questionnaire.
Please note that as regards references to Dani
sh case law I refer to the Danish Journal for
legal decisions (Ufr.).
The last digits after the year refers to the page
number in the relevant issue of the journal,
and the last letter after the page number refers
to the court in which the case was tried. "H"
stands for the Supreme Court, "Ø" stands for
the eastern High Court and "V" stands for the
western High Court of Denmark
Denmark is a party to the
Nordic Convention on Execution and Recognition of Civil Claims from 1978.
This convention exists between Denmark, Finland,
Iceland, Norway and Sweden, and obligates the
parties to recognize and execute judgments from th
e other member states. Fu
rthermore, Denmark is
a member to the
Lugano Convention
, which is parallel to the 1968
Brussels Convention, and therefore
covers the same areas as this. Denmark is also
a member to the Brussels Convention of May 10t
1952, regarding arrest of property in ships, and
the Hague Convention on Civil Procedure of March
1st, 1954.
National rules of jurisdiction barrin
g the enforcement of a non-EU judgment
The rules concerning recognition and enforc
ement of foreign judgments in Denmark are
listed in ss.223 a and 479 of the Danish Admini
stration of Justice Act. These rules empower
the Danish Ministry of Justice to provide legi
slation on the matter of recognition of foreign
judgments, but this empowermen
t has only been used a few times, none of which are rele-
vant to this question. As a result, foreign judgments can only be recognized in Denmark if this
obligation follows from a treaty between Denm
ark and the relevant country. Furthermore,
ss.223 a and 479 of the Administration of Justic
e Act state that a foreign decision can never
be recognized in Denmark,
if it is contrary to the
general laws of Denmark
BiH nije neka "tamo drzava" nego drzava koja je potpisnica istih konvencija kao i Danska, a Dansko pravosudje nije top 5, nego izmedju 5 i 10 u EU, to pokazuju zvanicni parametri kakvi su izvjestaji Europske komisije za efikasnost pravosudja.
steta sto vjerujes nepismenom svijetu Danskoj, a ne pismenim iz BiH.
Zato nemoj da vise trosim vrijeme nepotrebno.